This set of studies investigated replotting as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Replotting involves both the cognitive act of imagining alternative plot lines to avoid an undesirable story outcome and an accompanying emotion such as anger, anxiety, or sadness. Both studies utilized a 2 (story outcome: death vs. survivor) × 2 (efficacy appeal: present vs. absent) message experiment design. Study 1 (N = 1,207) tested a non-narrative efficacy appeal appended to the story and assessed replotting anger. Study 2 (N = 716) tested an efficacy appeal embedded within the narrative and assessed replotting anger, anxiety, and sadness. Death narratives generated greater replotting sadness across efficacy conditions and greater replotting anger and anxiety when a narrative efficacy appeal was not included in the story. Replotting was negatively related to counterarguing and positively related to message elaboration. Replotting influenced behavioral intention either via counterarguing or message elaboration dependent on the efficacy condition.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
BanerjeeS. C.GreeneK. (2012). Role of transportation in the persuasion process: Cognitive and affective responses to antidrug narratives. Journal of Health Communication, 17(5), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.635779
5.
BigsbyE.AlbarracínD. (2022). Self-and response efficacy information in fear appeals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab048
6.
BilandzicH.BusselleR. (2013). Narrative persuasion. In DillardJ. P.ShenL. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 200–219). SAGE.
7.
BraddockK.DillardJ. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
8.
BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2012). The history of attitudes and persuasion research. In KruglanskiA. W.StroebeW. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 285–320). Psychology Press.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
12.
DillardJ. P.ShenL. (2007). Self-report of discrete emotions. In ReynoldsR. A.WoodsR.BakerJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 330–333). Idea Group Reference.
13.
DurkinS.BaylyM.BrennanE.BienerL.WakefieldM. (2018). Fear, sadness and hope: Which emotions maximize impact of anti-tobacco mass media advertisements among lower and higher SES groups?. Journal of Health Communication, 23(5), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1463320
14.
Else-QuestN. M.JacksonT. L. (2014). Cancer stigma. In CorriganP. W. (Ed.), The stigma of disease and disability: Understanding causes and overcoming injustices (pp. 165–181). American Psychological Association
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
GerrigR. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Yale University Press.
18.
GerrigR. J.BezdekM. A. (2013). The role of participation in aesthetic illusion. In WolfW.BernhartW.MahlerA. (Eds.), Immersion and distance: Aesthetic illusion in literature and other media (pp. 89–112). Rodopi.
19.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
20.
HampsonS. E.EdmondsG. W.GoldbergL. R. (2019). The health behavior checklist: Factor structure in community samples and validity of a revised good health practices scale. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(8), 1103–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316687629
21.
HinyardL. J.KreuterM. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education & Behavior, 34(5), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106291963
22.
HolbertR. L.ParkE. (2020). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
23.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
JacksonS.BrashersD. E. (1994). Random factors in ANOVA. SAGE.
25.
JanickeS. H.RaneyA. A. (2018). Modeling the antihero narrative enjoyment process. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000152
26.
JensenJ. D.YaleR. N.KrakowM.JohnK. K.KingA. J. (2017). Theorizing foreshadowed death narratives: Examining the impact of character death on narrative processing and skin self-exam intentions. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1252816
27.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
28.
KrakowM. M.YaleR. N.JensenJ. D.CarcioppoloN.RatcliffC. L. (2018). Comparing mediational pathways for narrative-and argument-based messages: Believability, counterarguing, and emotional reaction. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy002
29.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
30.
LernerM. J.MillerD. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
31.
LillieH. M.JensenJ. D.PokharelM.UpshawS. J. (2021). Death narratives, negative emotion, and counterarguing: Testing fear, anger, and sadness as mechanisms of effect. Journal of Health Communication, 26(8), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1981495
32.
LillieH. M.PokharelM.JohnK. K.ChristyK. R.UpshawS.GiorgiE. A.JensenJ. D. (2021). Does it matter if a story character lives or dies? A message experiment comparing survivor and death narratives. Psychology & Health, 37(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1873337
33.
LuH. (2020). Exploring the role of incidental and integral compassion and anger in health communication about pollution. Health Communication, 35(6), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1582313
34.
Miller-DayM.HechtM. L. (2013). Narrative means to preventative ends: A narrative engagement framework for designing prevention interventions. Health Communication, 28(7), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.762861
35.
MoonsW. G.MackieD. M. (2007). Thinking straight while seeing red: The influence of anger on information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298566
36.
Moyer-GuséE. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
37.
NabiR. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
38.
NabiR. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216541
NabiR. L.GreenM. C. (2015). The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585
41.
NabiR. L.Moyer-GuséE.ByrneS. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196896
42.
NabiR. L.Roskos-EwoldsenD.Dillman CarpentierF. (2008). Subjective knowledge and fear appeal effectiveness: Implications for message design. Health Communication, 23(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701808327
43.
NanX. (2017). Influence of incidental discrete emotions on health risk perception and persuasion. Health Communication, 32(6), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1168004
44.
NiederdeppeJ.KimH. K.LundellH.FaziliF.FrazierB. (2012). Beyond counterarguing: Simple elaboration, complex integration, and counterelaboration in response to variations in narrative focus and sidedness. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01671.x
45.
OhS. H.LeeS. Y.HanC. (2020). The effects of social media use on preventive behaviors during infectious disease outbreaks: The mediating role of self-relevant emotions and public risk perception. Health Communication, 36(8), 972–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1724639
46.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
47.
RatcliffC. L. (2021). Characterizing reactance in communication research: A review of conceptual and operational approaches. Communication Research, 48(7), 1033–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219872126
48.
RatcliffC. L.SunY. (2020). Overcoming resistance through narratives: Findings from a meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 46(4), 412–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz017
SabidoM. (2004). The origins of entertainment-education. In SinghalA.CodyM. J.RogersE. M.SabidoM. (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 61–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
51.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
52.
ShafferV. A.FocellaE. S.HathawayA.SchererL. D.Zikmund-FisherB. J. (2018). On the usefulness of narratives: An interdisciplinary review and theoretical model. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(5), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax008
53.
ShenF.SheerV. C.LiR. (2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467
ShieldsG. S.MoonsW. G.TewellC. A.YonelinasA. P. (2016). The effect of negative affect on cognition: Anxiety, not anger, impairs executive function. Emotion, 16(6), 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000151
56.
SlaterM. D.RounerD. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
57.
Tal-OrN.BoningerD. S.PoranA.GleicherF. (2004). Counterfactual thinking as a mechanism in narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00734.x
TurnerM. M.RichardsA. S.BessarabovaE.MagidY. (2020). The effects of anger appeals on systematic processing and intentions: The moderating role of efficacy. Communication Reports, 33(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175
60.
WalterN.CohenJ. (2019). When less is more and more is less: The paradoxical metacognitive effects of counterarguing. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1580378
61.
WalterN.DemetriadesS. Z.NabiR. L. (2021). Seeing red through rose-colored glasses: Subjective hope as a moderator of the persuasive influence of anger. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa037
62.
WalterN.TukachinskyR.PelledA.NabiR. (2019). Meta-analysis of anger and persuasion: An empirical integration of four models. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy054
63.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E.SmoakN. D.FabrigarL. R. (2004). Multiple routes to resisting attitude change. In KnowlesE. S.LinnJ. A. (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 13–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64.
WitteK. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
65.
ZebregsS.van den PutteB.NeijensP.de GraafA. (2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 30(3), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.842528
66.
ZillmannD. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In BondebjergI. (Ed.), Moving images, culture, and the mind (pp. 53–63). University of Luton Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
