Online communities, like Wikipedia, produce valuable public information goods. Whereas some of these communities require would-be contributors to create accounts, many do not. Does this requirement catalyze cooperation or inhibit participation? Prior research provides divergent predictions but little causal evidence. We conduct an empirical test using longitudinal data from 136 natural experiments where would-be contributors to wikis were suddenly required to log in to contribute. Requiring accounts leads to a small increase in account creation, but reduces both high- and low-quality contributions from registered and unregistered participants. Although the change deters a large portion of low-quality participation, the vast majority of deterred contributions are of higher quality. We conclude that requiring accounts introduces an undertheorized tradeoff for public goods production in interactive communication systems.
AdlerB. T.de AlfaroL. (2007, May). A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 261–270). https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242608
2.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
AnthonyD. L.SmithS. W.WilliamsonT. (2009). Reputation and reliability in collective goods: The case of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Rationality and Society, 21(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463109336804
5.
AntinJ.CheshireC. (2010, February). Readers are not free-riders: Reading as a form of participation on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 127–130). https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718942
6.
AxelrodR. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
7.
BenklerY. (2002). Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and “the nature of the firm.”Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369–446. https://doi.org/10.2307/1562247
8.
BenklerY. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
9.
BenklerY.ShawA.HillB. M. (2015). Peer production: A form of collective intelligence. In MaloneT. W.BernsteinM. S. (Eds.), Handbook of collective intelligence (pp. 175–204). MIT Press.
BernsteinM. S.Monroy-HernándezA.HarryD.AndréP.PanovichK.VargasG. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In Fifth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/viewFile/2873/4398
CheshireC.AntinJ. (2008). The social psychological effects of feedback on the production of Internet information pools. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00416.x
14.
CoxM.ArnoldG.Villamayor TomásS. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03704-150438
15.
FarajS.JohnsonS. L. (2011). Network exchange patterns in online communities. Organization Science, 22(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0600
16.
FlöckF.ErdoganK.AcostaM. (2017). TokTrack: A complete token provenance and change tracking dataset for the English Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM ’17). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15689/14890
17.
FlöckF.VrandecˇicćD.SimperlE. (2012, June). Revisiting reverts: Accurate revert detection in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 3–12). https://doi.org/10.1145/2309996.2310000
18.
FreyS.BosM. W.SumnerR. W. (2017). Can you moderate an unreadable message? “Blind” content moderation via human computation. Human Computation, 4(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v4i1.5
FulkJ.FlanaginA. J.KalmanM. E.MongeP. R.RyanT. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00120.x
21.
GeigerR. S.HalfakerA. (2013, August). When the levee breaks: Without bots, what happens to Wikipedia’s quality control processes? In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym ’13) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/2491055.2491061
22.
GorbatâiA. (2014). The paradox of novice contributions to collective production: Evidence from Wikipedia (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1949327). Social Science Research Network. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1949327
23.
HalfakerA.KitturA.RiedlJ. (2011, October). Don’t bite the newbies: How reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym ’11) (pp. 163–172). https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038585
24.
HillB. M.ShawA. (2019). Studying populations of online communities. In Foucault WellesB.González-BailónS. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication (pp. 173–193). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190460518.013.8
25.
JayC.DunneR.GelsthorpeD.VigoM. (2016, May). To sign up, or not to sign up? Maximizing citizen science contribution rates through optional registration. In Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1827–1832). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858319
26.
JemielniakD. (2014). Common knowledge? An ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford University Press.
27.
JoinsonA. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In GackenbachJ. (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43–60). Academic Press.
28.
KaneG. C.JohnsonJ.MajchrzakA. (2014). Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Science, 60(12), 3026–3048. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1855
29.
KollockP. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In SmithM.KollockP. (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220–239). Routledge.
30.
KrautR. E.ResnickP.KieslerS. (2012). Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. MIT Press.
31.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
32.
LeufB.CunninghamW. (2001). The Wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. Addison-Wesley.
33.
MacKinnonJ. G.WhiteH. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7
34.
MargolinD.LiaoW. (2018). The emotional antecedents of solidarity in social media crowds. New Media & Society, 20, 3700–3719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818758702
35.
MarwellG.OliverP. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. Cambridge University Press.
36.
MongeP. R.ContractorN. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.
37.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford University Press.
38.
NarayanS.TeBlunthuisN.HaleW. S.HillB. M.ShawA. (2019). All talk: How increasing interpersonal communication on wikis may not enhance productivity. Proceedings of the ACM: Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 101:1-101:19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359203
39.
OberschallA. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Prentice-Hall.
40.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
41.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
42.
PiskorskiM. J.GorbatâiA. D. (2017). Testing Coleman’s social-norm enforcement mechanism: Evidence from Wikipedia. American Journal of Sociology, 122(4), 1183–1222. https://doi.org/10.1086/689816
43.
PriedhorskyR.ChenJ.LamS. K.PancieraK.TerveenL.RiedlJ. (2007, November). Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 259–268). https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316663
44.
RenY.HarperF.DrennerS.TerveenL.KieslerS.RiedlJ.KrautR. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703483
45.
SchweikC. M.EnglishR. C. (2012). Internet success: A study of open-source software commons. MIT Press.
46.
ShawA.HillB. M. (2014). Laboratories of oligarchy? How the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12082
47.
SlivkoO.KummerM.SaamM. (2016). Identification of causal effects in the context of mass collaboration. In CressU.MoskaliukJ.JeongH. (Eds.) Mass collaboration and education (pp. 391–411). Springer.
48.
TeBlunthuisN.ShawA.HillB. M. (2018). Revisiting “The rise and decline” in a population of peer production projects. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), 355:1–355:7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173929
49.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
50.
WoolleyA. W.ChabrisC. F.PentlandA.HashmiN.MaloneT. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
51.
YamagishiT.MatsudaM.YoshikaiN.TakahashiH.UsuiY. (2009). Solving the lemons problem with reputation. In CookK. S.SnijdersC.BuskensV.CheshireC. (Eds.), eTrust: Forming relationships in the online world (pp. 73–108). Russell Sage Foundation.
52.
YuanY.FulkJ.ShumateM.MongeP. R.BryantJ. A.MatsaganisM. (2005). Individual participation in organizational information commons. Human Communication Research, 31(2), 212–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00870.x
53.
ZhangX.ZhuF. (2011). Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. The American Economic Review, 101(4), 1601–1615. https://doi.org/10.2307/23045913
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
