Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-6
The Development and Influence of Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters: A Longitudinal Experimental Test of Prejudice Reduction Through Parasocial Contact
The current study investigates parasocial relationships as the underlying mechanism explaining prejudice reduction following extended exposure to mediated outgroups. Heterosexual participants viewed a fictional television series for 10 weeks depicting outgroup (gay) characters in which the outgroup attribute (sexuality) was accentuated or sanitized. Parasocial relationships with outgroup characters grew significantly over the course of the study regardless of condition. White participants and participants who reported the strongest pretest prejudice experienced the most intense growth. Outgroup prejudice decreased significantly over time for participants in both experimental conditions. Parasocial relationships predicted both prejudice reduction over time and behavioral responses to the outgroup. Parasocial relationships with an ingroup character engaged in intergroup contact did not contribute to prejudice reduction beyond parasocial relationships with outgroup characters. This research suggests that audiences can develop socioemotional bonds with outgroup television characters that can influence attitudes and behaviors much the same as direct, interpersonal intergroup contact.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
2.
BeckerR. (2006). Gay-themed television and the slumpy class: The affordable, multicultural politics of the gay nineties. Television & New Media, 7, 184–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476403255830
3.
BondB. J. (2014). Sex and sexuality in entertainment media popular with lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.816739
4.
BondB. J. (2016). Following your “friend”: Social media and the strength of adolescents’ PSRs with media personae. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0355
5.
BondB. J.ComptonB. L. (2015). Gay on-screen: The relationship between exposure to gay characters on television and heterosexual audiences’ endorsement of gay equality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1093485
6.
CalzoJ. P.WardL. M. (2009). Contributions of parents, peers, and media to attitudes toward homosexuality: Investigating sex and ethnic differences. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 1101–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903279338
7.
CohenJ. (2009). Mediated relationships and media effects. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 223–236). Sage.
8.
DibbleJ. L.HartmannT.RosaenS. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
9.
DibbleJ. L.RosaenS. F. (2011). Parasocial interaction as more than friendship: Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000044
10.
DovidioJ. F.LoveA.SchellhaasF. M. H.HewstoneM. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712052
11.
DuncanT. E.DuncanS. C.StryckerL. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and application (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
EyalK.DaileyR. M. (2012). Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.616276
13.
FujiokaY. (1999). Television portrayals of African American stereotypes: Examination of contact effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600105
14.
GilligT. K.MurphyS. T. (2016). Fostering support for LGBTQ youth? The effects of a gay adolescent media portrayal on young viewers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3828–3850. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5496
HerekG. M.GluntE. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes towards gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551707
HoffnerC. A.CohenE. L. (2012). Responses to obsessive compulsive disorder on Monk among series fans: Parasocial relations, presumed media influence, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 650–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732136
19.
HortonD.WohlR. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
20.
JoyceN.HarwoodJ. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41, 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
LevinaM.WaldoC. R.FitzgeraldL. F. (2000). We’re here, we’re queer, we’re on TV: The effects of visual media on heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 738–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02821.x
LytleA.DyarC.LevyS. R.LondonB. (2017). Essentialist beliefs: Understanding contact with and attitudes towards lesbian and gay individuals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12154
25.
McLaughlinB.RodriguezN. S. (2017). Identifying with a stereotype: The divergent effects of exposure to homosexual television characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 1196–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1242335
26.
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G. (2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v43n02_02
27.
Moyer-GuséE.DaleK. R.OrtizM. (2019). Reducing prejudice through narratives: An examination of the mechanisms of vicarious intergroup contact. Journal of Media Psychology, 31, 185–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000249
OrtizM.HarwoodJ. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487
30.
ParkS. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
31.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
32.
RosaenS. F.DibbleJ. L. (2016). Clarifying the role of attachment and social compensation on PSRs with television characters. Communication Studies, 67, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1121898
33.
RothbartM.JohnO. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01130.x
34.
RubinA. M.PerseE. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00129.x
SinkA.MastroD. (2018). Mediated contact with gay men as a predictor of modern homonegativity: An analysis of exposure to characters appearing on television from 2005 to 2015. Communication Reports, 31, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1360374
37.
StephanW. S.StephanC. W. (2013). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
StreitmatterR. (2009). From perverts to fab five: The media’s changing depiction of gay men and lesbians. Routledge.
39.
TianQ.HoffnerC. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430903296051
40.
TukachinskyR.SteverG. (2019). Theorizing development of parasocial engagement. Communication Theory, 29, 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty032
41.
VisintinE. P.VociA.PagottoL.HewstoneM. (2017). Direct, extended, and mass-mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12423
42.
WangQ.FinkE. L.CaiD. A. (2008). Loneliness, gender, and parasocial interaction: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Quarterly, 56, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701839057
43.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
