Guided by the frameworks of the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE) and the intergroup sensitivity effect, this experiment examined whether and how group identification manifested in user avatars, along with the supportiveness of others’ comments to a support-seeking post, may affect people’s support provision online. Participants were given the option to reply to a support-seeking post in an interactive forum. Participants’ responses were coded for verbal person-centeredness (VPC) and action-focused supportiveness. The SIDE model received some support. The results suggested that more participants replied to a support-seeking message posted by an in-group than by an out-group. Participants provided higher levels of action-focused supportiveness after viewing supportive comments from in-groups than from out-groups. They also provided messages with lower levels of VPC when exposed to unsupportive comments from in-groups than from out-groups. The intergroup sensitivity effect did not receive strong support. The implications of the study are discussed.
AakhusM.RumseyE. (2010). Crafting supportive communication online: A communication design analysis of conflict in an online support group. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903483581
2.
ArguelloJ.ButlerB.JoyceE.KrautR.LingK. S.RoseC.WangX. (2006). Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In CHI ’06 proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (vol. 2, pp. 959-968). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
3.
BurlesonB. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578-1588. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep8588469
4.
BurlesonB. R. (1987). Cognitive complexity. In McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 305-349). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
BurlesonB. R. (1990). Comforting as social support: Relational consequences of supportive behaviors. In DuckS. (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 66-82). London, England: SAGE.
6.
BurlesonB. R. (2003). Emotional support skills. In GreeneJ. O.BurlesonB. R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551-594). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
DeAndreaD. C. (2015). Testing the proclaimed affordances of online support groups in a nationally representative sample of adults seeking mental health assistance. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.914606
8.
DurantK. T.McCrayA. T.SafranC. (2012). Identifying gender-preferred communication styles within online cancer communities: A retrospective, longitudinal analysis. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e0049169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049169
9.
EdwardsC.EdwardsA. (2013). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication: The influence of mixed reviews on student perceptions of instructors and courses. Communication Education, 62, 412-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.800217
10.
FarzanR.DabbishL. A.KrautR. E.PostmesT. (2011). Increasing commitment to online communities by designing for social presence. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 321-330). Association for Computing Machinery.
FengB. (2014). When should advice be given? Assessing the role of sequential placement of advice in supportive interactions in two cultures. Communication Research, 41, 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212456203
13.
FengB.LiS.LiN. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43, 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510942
14.
GibbsJ. L.KimH.KiS. (2016). Investigating the role of control and support mechanisms in members’ sense of virtual community. Communication Research. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644023
15.
GueganJ.MolinerP.BuisineS. (2015). Why are online games so self-involving: A social identity analysis of massively multiplayer online role-playing games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2103
16.
HalpernD.GibbsJ. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29. 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
17.
HighA. C.Oeldorf-HirschA.BellurS. (2014). Misery rarely gets company: The influence of emotional bandwidth on supportive communication on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.037
18.
HornseyM. J.ImaniA. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261295
19.
HornseyM. J.OppesT.SvenssonA. (2002). “It’s OK if we say it, but you can’t”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.90
LiS.FengB. (2015). What to say to an online support-seeker? The influence of others’ responses and support-seekers’ replies. Human Communication Research, 41, 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12055
22.
LiS.FengB.ChenM.BellR. A. (2015). Physician review websites: Effects of the proportion and position of negative reviews on readers’ willingness to choose the doctor. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.977467
23.
LiS.FengB.LiN.TanX. (2015). How social context cues in online support-seeking influence self-disclosure in support provision. Communication Quarterly, 63, 586-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1078389
24.
LingK.BeenenG.LudfordP.WangX.ChangK.LiX.. . . KrautR. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00273.x
25.
MacGeorgeE. L. (2001). Support providers’ interaction goals: The influence of attributions and emotions. Communication Monographs, 68, 72-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128050
26.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317-354). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J.MeddersR. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60, 413-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
28.
MorierD.BryanA. E. B.KasdinL. (2013). The effects of group identity, group choice, and strength of group identification on intergroup sensitivity. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17, 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030190
29.
OhH. J.LaRoseR. (2016). Impression management concerns and support-seeking behavior on social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.005
O’SullivanP. B.CarrC. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20, 1161-1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
32.
PalomaresN. A. (2008). Explaining gender-based language use: Effects of gender identity salience on references to emotion and tentative language in intra- and intergroup contexts. Human Communication Research, 34, 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00321.x
33.
RainsS. A.BrunnerS. R. (2018). The outcomes of broadcasting self-disclosure using new communication technologies: Responses to disclosure vary across one’s social network. Communication Research, 45, 659-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215598836
34.
RainsS. A.KeatingD. M. (2015). Health blogging: An examination of the outcomes associated with making public, written disclosures about health. Communication Research, 42, 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212458952
35.
RainsS. A.KenskiK.CoeK.HarwoodJ. (2017). Incivility and political identity on the Internet: Intergroup factors as predictors of incivility in discussions of news online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12191
36.
RainsS. A.PetersonE. B.WrightK. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82, 403-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530
37.
RainsS. A.WrightK. B. (2016). Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-art review and agenda for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40, 175-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735260
38.
RainsS. A.YoungV. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35, 309-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.x
39.
ReicherS.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
40.
RenY.HarperF. M.DrennerS.TerveenL.KieslerS.RiedlJ.KrautR. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36, 841-864.
41.
SpottswoodE. L.WaltherJ. B.HolmstromA. J.EllisonN. B. (2013). Person-centered emotional support and gender attributions in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 39, 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12006
42.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: NelsonHall.
WaltherJ. B.BoydS. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In LinC. A.AtkinD. (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
46.
WaltherJ. B.DeAndreaD.KimJ.AnthonyJ. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on youtube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
47.
WangW.ShenF. (2017). Reciprocal communication in online health support groups: Effects of message format and social support on individual responses to health issues. Media Psychology, 20, 240-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1142381
48.
WangZ.WaltherJ. B.HancockJ. T. (2009). Social identification and interpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication: What you do versus who you are in virtual groups. Human Communication Research, 35, 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01338.x
49.
WrightK. B. (2002). Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support, perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880216586
50.
WrightK. B.RainsS. A. (2014). Weak tie support preference and preferred coping styles as predictors of perceived credibility within health-related computer-mediated support groups. Health Communication, 29, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.751084
51.
WrightK. B.RainsS. A.BanasJ. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 606-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01505.x
52.
XuY.BurlesonB. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x
53.
YangF.ZhongB.KumarA.ChowS.-M.OuyangA. (2017). Exchanging social support online: A longitudinal social network analysis of irritable bowel syndrome patients’ interactions on a health forum. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95, 1033-1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017729815
54.
YilmazG.PeñaJ. (2014). The influence of social categories and interpersonal behaviors on future intentions and attitudes to form subgroups in virtual teams. Communication Research, 41, 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212443696
55.
YoungvorstL. J.HighA. C. (2018). “Anyone free to chat?” Using technological features to elicit quality support online. Communication Monographs, 85, 203-223.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
