Selective reading of political online information was examined based on cognitive dissonance, social identity, and news values frameworks. Online reports were displayed to 156 Americans while selective exposure was tracked. The news articles that participants chose from were either conservative or liberal and also either positive or negative regarding American political policies. In addition, information processing styles (cognitive reflection and need-for-cognition) were measured. Results revealed confirmation and negativity biases, per cognitive dissonance and news values, but did not corroborate the hypothesis derived from social identity theory. Greater cognitive reflection, greater need-for-cognition, and worse affective state fostered the confirmation bias; stronger social comparison tendency reduced the negativity bias.
AppiahO.Knobloch-WesterwickS.AlterS. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63, 517-534. doi:10.1111/jcom.12032
2.
BennettW. L.IyengarS. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
3.
CheekJ. M.TroppL. R.ChenL. C.UnderwoodM. K. (1994, August). Identity orientations: Personal, social, and collective aspects of identity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association. Los Angeles, CA.
4.
D’AlessioD.AllenM. (2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50, 133-156.
5.
D’AlessioD.AllenM. (2002). Selective exposure and dissonance after decisions. Psychological Reports, 91, 527-532.
6.
DonsbachW. (1991). Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on readers’ selectivity. European Journal of Communication, 6, 155-186. doi:10.1177/0267323191006002003
7.
DonsbachW. (2009). Cognitive dissonance theory—Roller coaster career: How communication research adapted the theory of cognitive dissonance. In HartmannT. (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (pp. 128-149). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
EildersC. (2006). News factors and news decisions: Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany. Communications, 31, 5-24. doi:10.1515/COMMUN.2006.002
9.
EpsteinS.PaciniR.Denes-RajV.HeierH. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390-405. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
10.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
11.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
FrederickS. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732
13.
GarrettR. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676-699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
14.
GibbonsF. X.BuunkB. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development and validation of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.129
15.
GilmoreJ.MeeksL.DomkeD. (2013). Why do (we think)they hate us: Anti-Americanism, patriotic messages, and attributions of blame. International Journal of Communication, 7, 701-721.
16.
HartW.AlbarracínD.EaglyA. H.BrechanI.LindbergM. J.MerrillL. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555-588. doi:10.1037/a0015701
17.
HoffnerC.RehkoffR. A. (2011). Young voters’ responses to the 2004 U.S. presidential election: Social identity, perceived media influence, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Communication, 61, 732-757. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01565.x
18.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
19.
IyengarS.SoodG.LelkesY. (2012). Affect, not ideology a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405-431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
20.
JonasE.GraupmannV.FreyD. (2006). The influence of mood on the search for supporting versus conflicting information: Dissonance reduction as a means of mood regulation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 3-15. doi:10.1177/0146167205276118
21.
JonesT. M.SheetsP. (2009). Torture in the eye of the beholder: Social identity, news coverage, and Abu Ghraib. Political Communication, 26, 278-295. doi:10.1080/10584600903053460
22.
KahanD. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407-424. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2182588.
23.
Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2008). Informational utility. In DonsbachW. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (pp. 2273-2276). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
24.
Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. Journal of Communication, 62, 628-642. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x.
25.
Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2015). The selective exposure self- and affect-management (SESAM) model: Applications in the realms of race, politics, and health. Communication Research, 42, 959-985. doi:10.1177/0093650214539173
26.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.HastallM. R. (2010). Please your self: Social identity effects on selective exposure to news about in- and out-groups. Journal of Communication, 60, 515-535. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01495.x
27.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MengJ. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36, 426-448. doi:10.1177/0093650209333030
28.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MengJ. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61, 349-368. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x
29.
LengauerG.EsserF.BerganzaR. (2012). Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 179-202. doi:10.1177/1464884911427800
30.
LipsetS. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
31.
MeffertM. F.ChungS.JoinerA. J.WaksL.GarstJ. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56, 27-51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00003.x
32.
RivenburghN. K. (2000). Social identity theory and new portrayals of citizens involved in international affairs. Media Psychology, 2, 303-329. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0204_01
33.
ShoemakerP. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32-47. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
34.
SmithS. M.FabrigarL. R.NorrisM. E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 464-493. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x
35.
SorokaS.McAdamsS. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32, 1-22. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
36.
StroudN. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556-576. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
37.
StroudN. J.MuddimanA.LeeJ. K. (2014). Seeing media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perceptions. Journal of Communication, 64, 874-894. doi:10.1111/jcom.12110
38.
TaberC. S.LodgeM. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
39.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
40.
WesterwickA.KleinmanS. B.Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2013). Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63, 432-453. doi:10.1111/jcom.12028
41.
ZillmannD.ChenL.KnoblochS.CallisonC. (2004). Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to Internet news reports. Communication Research, 31, 58-81. doi:10.1177/0093650203260201
42.
ZillmannD.KnoblochS.YuH. (2001). Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3, 301-324. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_01
