Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors

Abstract

Incivility in public discourse has become a pressing concern of citizens and scholars alike, but most research has focused narrowly on incivility in elite discourse. The present study examines how the lay public perceives incivility, using two surveys to track differences in perceptions of specific types of uncivil speech and identify predictors of those perceptions. The results show that different types of incivility elicit different responses. In particular, name-calling and vulgarity were rated as more uncivil than were other speech acts. In addition, several demographic, personality, and news consumption variables were analyzed as predictors of incivility perceptions.

Keywords

incivility civility political discourse online discourse online comments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

P. A.

Lustig

M. W.

Andersen

J. F.

(1987). Regional patterns of communication in the United States: A theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 54, 128-144. doi:10.1080/03637758709390222

Anderson

A. A.

Brossard

Scheufele

D. A.

Xenos

M. A.

Ladwig

(2014). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373-387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009

Areni

C. S.

(2003). The effects of structural and grammatical variables on persuasion: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 349-375. doi:10.1002/mar.10077

Ashton

M. C.

Paunonen

S. V.

Helmes

Jackson

D. N.

(1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the Big Five personality factors. Evolution & Human Behavior, 19, 243-255. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00009-9

Ben-Porath

E. N.

(2010). Interview effects: Theory and evidence for the impact of televised political interviews on viewer attitudes. Communication Theory, 20, 323-347. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01365.x

Berry

J. M.

Sobieraj

(2014). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Borah

(2013). Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Communication, 30, 456-473. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737426

Borah

(2014). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41, 809-827. doi:10.1177/0093650212449353

Brooks

D. J.

Geer

J. G.

(2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 1-16. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x

10.

Coe

Kenski

Rains

S. A.

(2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658-679. doi:10.1111/jcom.12104

11.

da Silva

M. T

. (2013). Online forums, audience participation and modes of political discussion: Readers’ comments on the Brazilian presidential election as a case study. Communication & Society/Comunicación y sociedad, 26, 175-193.

12.

Gervais

B. T.

(2014). Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication, 31, 564-583. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.852640

13.

Gervais

B. T.

(2015). Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12, 167-185. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.997416

14.

Goldstein

S. B.

(1999). Construction and validation of a conflict communication scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1803-1832. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00153.x

15.

Gosling

S. D.

Rentfrow

P. J.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

16.

Harris

R. J.

(2009). A cognitive psychology of mass communication (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

Herbst

(2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

18.

Hmielowski

J. D.

Hutchens

M. J.

Cicchirillo

V. J.

(2014). Living in an age of online incivility: Examining the conditional indirect effects of online discussion on political flaming. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 1196-1211. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.899609

19.

Hwang

Kim

Huh

C. U.

(2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 621-633. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.966365

20.

Jamieson

K. H.

(1997, March 1). Civility in the House of Representatives (APPC Report #10). Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/civility-in-the-house-of-representatives/

21.

Jamieson

K. H.

(2011, September 28). Civility in Congress (1935-2011) as reflected in the taking down process (APPC Report No. 2011-1). Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/Downloads/Civility/Civility_9-27-2011_Final.pdf

22.

Jamieson

K. H.

Hardy

(2012). What is civil engaged argument and why does aspiring to it matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, 45, 412-415. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000479

23.

Jacoby

(1978). Consumer research: A state of the art review. Journal of Marketing, 42, 87-96. doi:10.2307/1249890

24.

Kelley

(2007). Dishonorable treatment: Workplace incivility, cultures of honor, and work outcomes (Masters Theses & Specialist Projects, Paper 427). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/427

25.

Maisel

L. S.

(2012). The negative consequences of uncivil political discourse. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45, 405-411. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000467

26.

Manosevitch

Walker

D. M.

(2009, April 17-18). Reader comments to online opinion journalism: A space of public deliberation. Paper presented to the 10th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX.

27.

Massaro

T. M.

Stryker

(2012). Freedom of speech, liberal democracy, and emerging evidence on civility and effective democratic engagement. Arizona Law Review, 54, 375-441.

28.

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Molenda

A. K.

Cramer

C. R.

(2015). Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 194-209. doi:10.1177/0361684314565777

29.

Muddiman

A. R.

(2013). The instability of incivility: How news frames and citizen perceptions shape conflict in American politics (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.

30.

Mutz

D. C.

(2007). Effects of “in-your-face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101, 621-635. doi:10.1017/S000305540707044X

31.

Mutz

D. C.

(2015). In-your-face politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

32.

Mutz

D. C.

Reeves

(2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99, 1-15. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051452

33.

O’Sullivan

P. B.

Flanagin

A. J.

(2003). Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages. New Media & Society, 5, 69-94. doi:10.1177/1461444803005001908

34.

Papacharissi

(2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6, 259-283. doi:10.1177/1461444804041444

35.

Perry

D. G.

Perry

L. C.

Weiss

R. J.

(1989). Sex differences in the consequences that children anticipate for aggression. Developmental Psychology, 25, 312-319. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.25.2.312

36.

Rowe

(2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 121-138. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365

37.

Ruiz

Domingo

Micó

J. L.

Díaz-Noci

Meso

Masip

(2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 463-487. doi:10.1177/1940161211415849

38.

Santana

A. D.

(2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8, 18-33. doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.813194

39.

Shea

D. M.

Fiorina

M. P.

(Eds.). (2013). Can we talk? The rise of rude, nasty, stubborn politics. New York, NY: Pearson.

40.

Sobieraj

Berry

J. M.

(2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28, 19-41. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.542360

41.

Stroud

N. J.

Scacco

J. M.

Muddiman

Curry

A. L.

(2015). Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 188-203. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12104

42.

Stryker

Conway

B. A.

Danielson

J. T.

(2016). What is political incivility? Communication Monographs, 83, 535-556. doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207

43.

Thorson

Vraga

Ekdale

(2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 289-313. doi:10.1080/15205430903225571

44.

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

Smithson

A.-B.

Troller-Renfree

(2016). Blurred lines: Defining social, news, and political posts on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13, 272-294. doi:10.1080/19331681.2016.1160265

45.

Weber Shandwick. (2013). Civility in America 2013: Incivility has reached crisis levels. Retrieved from http://www.webershandwick.com/news/article/civility-in-america-2013-incivility-has-reached-crisis-levels

46.

York

(2013). Cultivating political incivility: Cable news, network news, and public perceptions. Electronic News, 7, 107-125. doi:10.1177/1931243113507926