Although scholars consider it important for citizens to seek diverse information to optimize citizenship, a growing body of research suggests that many people predominantly expose themselves to information that confirms their previous beliefs. Using four waves of survey data from an online panel of 2,450 Americans, this study explores a disconnect between information values and practices to identify (1) whether citizens exemplify the diversity-seeking values endorsed in communication scholarship, (2) whether individuals who hold diversity-seeking values enact these values, and (3) whether diversity-seeking values and traits are emblematic of good democratic citizenship. Results suggest that nearly half of respondents either did not hold diversity-seeking values or failed to actualize the values they expressed. Individuals who held diversity-seeking values were more politically knowledgeable and more likely to have voted in 2014, regardless of their diversity-seeking traits.
AjzenI. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 1-63. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60411-6
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
3.
BakerC. E. (2008). Viewpoint diversity and media ownership. Federal Communications Law Journal, 61, 651-671.
4.
BakerR.BlumbergS. J.BrickJ. M.CouperM. P.CourtrightM.DennisJ. M.ZahsD. (2010). Research synthesis: AAPOR report on online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 711-781. doi:10.1093/poq/nfq048
5.
BakshyE.MessingS.AdamicL. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348, 1130-1132. doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160
6.
BullockJ.GerberA. S.HillS.HuberG. (2013). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics (No. 19080). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
CallegaroM.DiSograC. (2008). Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 1008-1032. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn065
8.
CapraraG. V.SchwartzS.CapannaC.VecchioneM.BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1-28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x
9.
ChaffeeS. H.SaphirM. N.GrafJ.SandvigC.HahnK. S. (2001). Attention to counter-attitudinal messages in a state election campaign. Political Communication, 18, 247-272. doi:10.1080/10584600152400338
10.
CohenJ. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
11.
DahlR. A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DahlR. A. (2000). On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Delli CarpiniM. X.CookF. L.JacobsL. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
14.
de TocquevilleA. (1969). Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
15.
DilliplaneS. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 287-316. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr006
16.
EinsteinM. (2004). Media diversity: Economics, ownership, and the FCC. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
FestingerL. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
FischerR.BoerD. (2015). Motivational basis of personality traits: A meta-analysis of value-personality correlations. Journal of personality, 83, 491-510. doi:10.1111/jopy.12125
19.
FishkinJ. S.LuskinR. C. (2005). Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica, 40, 284-298. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
20.
GainesB. J.KuklinskiJ. H.QuirkP. J.PeytonB.VerkuilenJ. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics, 69, 957-974. 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00601.x
21.
GarrettR. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676-699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
22.
GarrettR. K.CarnahanD.LynchE. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113-134. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6
23.
GarrettR. K.ResnickP. (2011). Resisting political fragmentation on the Internet. Daedalus, 140(4), 108-120. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00118
24.
GarrettR. K.StroudN. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680-701. doi:10.1111/jcom.12105
25.
InglehartR. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
27.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
KahanA. S. (1992). Aristocratic liberalism: The social and political thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29.
KimD. H.KwakN. (2014, May). Media policies for the public: Empirical evidence examining exposure diversity and democratic citizenship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association 64th Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.
30.
KlapperJ. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York, NY: The Free Press.
31.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.KleinmanS. B. (2012). Preelection selective exposure: Confirmation bias versus informational utility. Communication Research, 39, 170-193. doi:10.1177/0093650211400597
32.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MengJ. (2009). Looking the other way selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426-448. doi:10.1177/0093650209333030
33.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MengJ. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61, 349-368. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x
34.
LanceC. E.ButtsM. M.MichelsL. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say?Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202-220. doi:10.1177/1094428105284919
35.
LaRoseR. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory, 20, 194-222. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01360.x
36.
LeeH.KwakN.CampbellS. W. (2015). Hearing the other side revisited: The joint workings of cross-cutting discussion and strong tie homogeneity in facilitating deliberative and participatory democracy. Communication Research, 42, 569-596. doi:10.1177/0093650213483824
37.
LodgeM.TaberC. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26, 455-482. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
38.
LupiaA. (2006). How elitism undermines the study of voter competence. Critical Review, 18, 217-232. doi:10.1080/08913810608443658
39.
MessingS.WestwoodS. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042-1063. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
40.
MondakJ. J.DavisB. C. (2001). Asked and answered: Knowledge levels when we will not take “don’t know” for an answer. Political Behavior, 23, 199-224. doi:10.1023/a:1015015227594
41.
MunsonS. A.LeeS. Y.ResnickP. (2013). Encouraging reading of diverse political viewpoints with a browser widget. In Proceedings of the 7th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 419-428). Cambridge, MA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
42.
MutzD. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855. doi:10.2307/3088437
43.
MutzD. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MutzD. C.MartinP. S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 97-114. doi:10.1017/s0003055401000223
45.
NapoliP. M. (1999). Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communications, 49(4), 7-34. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x
46.
NeumanW. R.BimberB.HindmanM. (2011). The Internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In JacobsL. R.ShapiroR. Y. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 22-42). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
PariserE. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.
49.
ParkS.KangS.ChungS.SongJ. (2009, April). NewsCube: Delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 443-452). Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery.
50.
PasekJ. (2015). When will nonprobability samples mirror probability samples? Considering types of inference and weighting strategies as conditions for correspondence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 269-291. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv016
51.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
PriorM. (2009). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. Journal of Politics, 71, 893-908. doi:10.1017/s0022381609090781
53.
PriorM. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
54.
RedlawskD. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00161
55.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS. H.KnafoA. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789-801. doi:10.1177/0146167202289008
56.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press.
57.
SchwartzS. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In SeligmanC.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
SchwartzS. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
59.
SchwartzS. H.BoehnkeK. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230-255. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00069-2
60.
StroudN. J. (2006). Selective exposure to partisan information (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (UMI No. 305258821)
61.
StroudN. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556-576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
62.
StroudN. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
SunsteinC. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
TaberC. S.LodgeM. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
65.
WestenD.BlagovP. S.HarenskiK.KiltsC.HamannS. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1947-1958. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947
66.
YeagerD. S.KrosnickJ. A.ChangL.JavitzH. S.LevenduskyM. S.SimpserA.WangR. (2011). Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 709-747. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr020
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
