This study, with two parts, investigated host environment and host communication factors in Hong Kong ethnic minority members’ cross-cultural adaptation. Study I examined host receptivity, host conformity pressure, host communication competence (HCC), and host communication satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with life self-reported by Hong Kongers of south-/south-east Asian origin (n = 195). Results showed that host receptivity and host communication satisfaction contributed significantly to satisfaction with life. Study II was a partial replication of Study I with a broader sample (n = 140). Hierarchical multiple regressions replicated the earlier findings that host receptivity did and host conformity pressure did not predict satisfaction with life in the same direction. MANOVA of high and low HCC groups yielded significant main effects on host receptivity, host conformity pressure, host communication satisfaction, and life satisfaction. Implications of the findings are discussed.
AlwinD. F. (1997). Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: Which are better?Sociological Methods & Research, 25, 318-340.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BellR. A.DalyJ. A. (1984). The affinity-seeking function of communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 91-115.
4.
BourhisR. Y.BarretteG.El-GelediS.SchmidtR. (2009). Acculturation orientations and social relations between immigrants and host community members in California. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 443-467.
5.
BourhisR. Y.MoiseL. C.PerraultS.SenecalS. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386.
6.
BourhisR. Y.MontreuilA.BarretteG.MontaruliE. (2009). Acculturation and immigrant-host community relations in multicultural settings. In DemoulinS.LeyensJ. P.DovidioJ. (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 39-61). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
7.
BraunV.KimY. Y. (2002, May). Intercultural communication and psychological health of Turkish workers in an American workplace in Germany. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Seoul, Korea.
8.
ChanA. C. M.WongH. Y. E. (2005). Survey on public attitude and perception towards ethnic minorities 2004. (APIAS Mongraph Paper 6). Hong Kong: Lingnan University.
9.
ChenL. (1994). How we know what we know about Americans: Chinese sojourners talking about their experience. In GonzalesA.HoustonM.ChenV. (Eds.), Our voices: Essays in culture, ethnicity, and communication(pp. 125-132). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Press.
10.
ChenL. (2002). Perception of intercultural interaction and communication satisfaction: A study of face-to-face interaction in an intercultural setting. Communication Reports, 15, 133-147.
11.
ChenL.IsaM. (2003). Intercultural communication and cultural learning: A study of Japanese visiting students in the US. Howard Journal of Communications, 14, 75-96.
12.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
GadermannA. M.GuhnM.ZumboB. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1-13.
16.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.RubinD. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis. New York, NY: CRC Press.
17.
GordonM. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
GudykunstW. B.NishidaT.ChuaE. (1987). Perceptions of social penetration in Japanese-North American dyads. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 11, 171-190.
19.
GudykunstW. B.ShapiroR. (1996). Communication in everyday interpersonal and intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 19-45.
20.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
21.
HechtM. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 253-264.
22.
HechtM. L.LarkeyL. K.JohnsonJ. N. (1992). African American and European American perceptions of problematic issues in interethnic communication effectiveness. Human Communication Research, 19, 209-236.
23.
HechtM. L.RibeauS.AlbertsJ. (1989). An Afro-American perspective on interethnic communication. Communication Monographs, 56, 501-513.
KangS. M. (2006). Measurement of acculturation, scale formats, and language competence: Their implications for adjustment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 669-693. doi:10.1177/0022022106292077
26.
KimY. Y. (1988). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
27.
KimY. Y. (1995). Cross-cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In WisemanR. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 170-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
KimY. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
KimY. Y. (2005). Adapting to a new culture: An integrative communication theory. In GudykunstW. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 375-400). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
KimY. Y.KimY.-S. (2004, November). The role of host environment in cross-cultural adaptation: A comparison of American expatriates in South Korea and their Korean counterparts in the United States. Paper presented at NCA Annual Convention, Chicago, IL.
31.
KimY. Y.LujanP.DixonL. D. (1998). “I can walk both ways”: Identity integration of American Indians in Oklahoma. Human Communication Research, 25, 252-274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00445.x
32.
KimY. Y.McKay-SemmlerK. (2013). Social engagement and cross-cultural adaptation: An examination of direct and mediated interpersonal communication activities of educated non-natives in the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 99-112.
33.
KosicA.MannettiL.SamD. L. (2005). The role of majority attitudes towards out-group in the perception of the acculturation strategies of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 273-288.
34.
LeeB. K.ChenL. (2000). Cultural communication competence and psychological adjustment: A study of Chinese immigrant children’s cross-cultural adaptation in Canada. Communication Research, 27, 764-791.
35.
MaruyamaM. (1998). Cross-cultural adaptation and host environment: A study of international students in Japan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman.
36.
McKay-SemmlerK.KimY. Y. (2014). Cross-cultural adaptation of Hispanic youth: A study of communication patterns, functional fitness, and psychological health. Communication Monographs, 81, 133-156. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.870346
37.
NadamitsuY.ChenL.FriedrichG. (1999). Chinese in Japan: Encounter with a different group consciousness. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11, 53-84.
38.
NeuliepJ. W. (2012). The relationship among intercultural communication apprehension, ethnocentrism, uncertainty reduction, and communication satisfaction during initial intercultural interaction: An extension of anxiety and uncertainty management (AUM) theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41, 1-16.
39.
PatersonA. D.Hakim-LarsonJ. (2012). Arab youth in Canada: Acculturation, enculturation, social support, and life satisfaction. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 40, 206-215.
40.
PavotW.DienerE. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172.
41.
PodsakoffP. M.MackenzieS. B.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
42.
RubinR. B.MartinM. M. (1994). Development of a measure of interpersonal communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 11, 33-44.
43.
RuppA. A.DeyD. K.ZumboB. D. (2004). To Bayes or not to Bayes, from whether to when: Applications of Bayesian methodology to modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 424-451.
44.
SafdarS.DupuisD. R.LewisR. J.El-GelediS.BourhisR. Y. (2008). Social axioms and acculturation orientations of English Canadians toward British and Arab Muslim immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 415-426.
45.
SpitzbergB. H. (1991). An examination of trait measures of interpersonal competence. Communication Reports, 4, 22-29.
46.
StevensJ. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47.
StewartJ. (n.d.). The personal website and blog of author John Stewart. Available from http://www.johnstewart.org/
48.
StraussD.SadlerP. M. (1989). Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for ends of local taxon ranges. Mathematical Geology, 21, 411-427.
49.
ThompsonM. D.Hoffman-GoetzL. (2009). Defining and measuring acculturation: A systematic review of public health studies with Hispanic populations in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 983-991. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.034
50.
WoodJ. T.DuckS. W. (Eds.). (2006). Composing relationships: Communication in everyday life. Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.
51.
YingY. (1992). Life satisfaction among San Francisco Chinese Americans. Social Indicators Research, 26, 1-22.
52.
ZaneN.MakW. (2005). Major approaches to the measurement of acculturation among ethnic minority populations: A content analysis and an alternative empirical strategy. In ChunM. K.OrganistaB. P.MarinG. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research (pp. 39-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53.
ZumboB. D.GadermannA. M.ZeisserC. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21-29.
