Current approaches explain the effects of news frames on judgments in terms of cognitive mechanisms, such as accessibility and applicability effects. We investigated the emotional effects of two news frames—an “anger” frame and a “sadness” frame—on information processing and opinion formation. We found that the two frames produced different levels of anger and sadness. Furthermore, the anger frame increased the accessibility of information about punishment and the preference for punitive measures in comparison with the sadness frame and the control group. In contrast, the sadness frame increased the accessibility of information about help for victims and the preference for remedial measures. More importantly, these effects were mediated by the anger and sadness that were elicited by the news frames.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
2.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
3.
FaseurT.GeuensM. (2010). Communicating the right emotion to generate help for connected versus unconnected others. Communication Research, 37, 498-521.
4.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FrijdaN. H. (1993). Moods, emotion episodes, and emotions. In LewisM.HavilandJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 381-403). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
GaultB. A.SabiniJ. (2000). The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes towards punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 495-520.
7.
GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD.Simon-ThomasE. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351-374.
8.
GrossK. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29, 169-192.
9.
HayesA. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
KepplingerH. M.BrosiusH.-B.StaabJ. F. (1991). Opinion formation in mediated conflicts and crises: A theory of cognitive-affective media effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3, 132-156.
11.
KimH. J.CameronG. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38, 826-855.
12.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 473-493.
14.
MitchellM. M.BrownK. M.Morris-VillagranM.VillagranP. D. (2001). The effects of anger, sadness and happiness on persuasive message processing: A test of the negative state relief model. Communication Monographs, 68, 347-359.
15.
NabiR. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292-320.
16.
NabiR. L. (2002a). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69, 204-216.
17.
NabiR. L. (2002b). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In DillardJ. P.PfauM. (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 289-308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
NabiR. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differently influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference. Communication Research, 30, 224-247.
19.
NabiR. L. (2007). Emotion and persuasion: A social-cognitive perspective. In Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.MonahanJ. L. (Eds.), Communication and social cognition. Theories and methods (pp. 377-398). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
NabiR. L. (2009). Emotion and media effects. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 205-221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
NelsonT. E.OxleyZ. M.ClawsonR. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221-246.
22.
NerbJ.SpadaH. (2001). Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 521-551.
23.
O’KeefeD. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251-274.
24.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
25.
PotterW. J.RiddleK. (2007). A content analysis of the media effects literature. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 90-104.
26.
PriceV.TewksburyD. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In BarnettG. A.BosterF. J. (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.
27.
PriceV.TewksburyD.PowersE. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506.
28.
RaghunathanR.PhamM. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 56-77.
29.
RosemanI. J.WiestC.SwartzT. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206-221.
30.
SchererK. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In SchererK. R.EkmanP. (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293-318). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
SchererK. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured?Social Science Information, 44, 695-729.
32.
ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316.
33.
SmallD. A.LernerJ. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29, 149-168.
34.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
