This study proposes the third-person perception (TPP) can be viewed as a type of comparative social judgment in the domain of media influence, in that it is a function of assimilation, contrast, and anchoring mechanisms in the process of social comparison. The derived hypotheses were tested with web-based experimental data (N = 511). Results showed some evidence that TPP was a function of assimilation and contrast effects. There was also evidence that there were anchoring effects, and such effects tended to emerge when self was the anchor. Implication and directions for future research on TPP were discussed.
AlickeM. D.LoSchivavoF. M.ZerbstJ.ZhangS. (1997). The person who out performs me is a genius: Maintaining perceived competence in upward social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 781-789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.781
2.
BiernatM.ManisM.KobrynowiczD. (1997). Simultaneous assimilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 254-269. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.254
3.
BirnbaumM. H. (1999). How to show that 9 > 221: Collect judgments in a between-subjects design. Psychological Methods, 1, 243-249. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.243
4.
BrosiusH. B.EngelD. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence?International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142-162. doi:10.1093/ijpor/8.2.142
5.
ChambersJ. R.WindschitlP. D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813-838. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813
6.
ChapmanG. B.JohnsonE. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 1-39. doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2841
7.
CohenJ.MutzD.PriceV.GuntherA. C. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation: An experiment on third-person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173. doi:10.1086/269092
8.
DavidP.JohnsonM. (1998). The role of self in third-person effects about body image. Journal of Communication, 48, 37-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02769.x
9.
DavidP.MorrisonG.JohnsonM.RossF. (2002). Body image, race, and fashion models: Social distance and social identification in third-person effects. Communication Research, 29, 270-294. doi:10.1177/0093650202029003003
10.
DavidR.LiuK.MyserM. (2004). Methodological artifact or persistent bias? Testing the robustness of the third-person and reverse third-person effects for alcohol messages. Communication Research, 31, 206-233. doi:10.1177/0093650203261513
11.
DavisonP. W. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15. doi:10.1086/268763
12.
DavisonP. W. (1996). The third-person effect revisited. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 113-119.
13.
DuckJ.HoggM.TerryD. (1995). Me, us and them: Political identification and the third-person effect in 1993 Australian federal election. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 195-215. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250206
14.
DuckJ. M.MullinB. A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 77-93. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250107
15.
DunningD. (2000). Social judgment as implicit social comparison. In SulsJ.WheelerL. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 353-378). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
16.
DunningD.HayesA. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213
17.
EvelandW. P.JrNathansonA. I.DetenberB. H.McLeodD. M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person perception. Communication Research, 26, 275-302. doi:10.1177/009365099026003001
18.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 71-82.
19.
GelmanA.PardoeI. (2006). Bayesian measures of explained variance and pooling in multilevel (hierarchical) models. Technometrics, 48, 241-251.
20.
GranbergD. (1982). Social judgment theory. In BurgoonM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook6 (pp. 304-329). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
21.
GuntherA. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequences in third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372. doi:10.1177/009365091018003004
22.
GuntherA. C.StoreyJ. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199-215. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
23.
KarylowskiJ. J. (1990). Social reference points and accessibility of trait-related information in self-other similarity judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 975-983. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.975
24.
KosickiG. M.McLeodJ. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information processing strategies. In KrausS. (Ed.), Mass communication and political information processing (pp.69-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
KrugerJ. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221-232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.221
26.
KrugerJ.GilovichT. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-assessment is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328-339. doi:10.1177/0146167203259932
27.
KruglanskiA. W.MayselessO. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 195-208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.195
28.
McGuireW. J.McGuireC. V. (1986). Differences in conceptualizing self versus conceptualizing other people as manifested in contrasting verb types used in natural speech. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1135-1143. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1135
29.
McLeodD. M.DetenberB. H.EvelandW. P. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678-695. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02902.x
30.
McLeodD. M.EvelandW. P.NathansonA. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24(2), 153-174. doi:10.1177/009365097024002003
31.
McLeodJ. M.McDonaldD. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12, 3-33. doi:10.1177/009365085012001001
32.
MussweilerT. (2001). “Seek and ye shall find”: Antecedents of assimilation and contrast effects in social comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 499-509. doi:10.1002/ejsp.75
33.
MussweilerT. (2003). Comparison process in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.472
34.
MussweilerT.RüterK.EpstudeK. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 832-844. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.832
35.
OgdenJ. (2003). Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual analysis. Health Psychology, 22, 424-428. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424
36.
OttenW.van der PligtJ. (1996). Context effects in the measurement of comparative optimism in probability judgments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 80-101.
37.
PeiserW.PeterJ. (2000). Third-person perception of television-viewing behavior. Journal of Communication, 50, 25-45. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02832.x
38.
PerloffR. M. (2002). The third-person effect. In BryantJ.ZillmannD. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 489-506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
PrenticeD. A. (1990). Familiarity and differences in self- and other- representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 369-383. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.369
40.
PriceV.HuangL. N.TewksburyD. (1997). The third-person effect of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 525-540.
41.
ProninE.GilovichT.RossL. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111, 781-799. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
42.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2005). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
43.
ReidS.HoggM. (2005). A self-categorization explanation for the third-person effect. Human Communication Research, 31, 129-161. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00867.x
44.
RogersT. B. (1981). A model of the self as an aspect of the human information processing system. In CantorN.KihlstromJ. F. (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (pp. 193-214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
SherifM.TaubD.HovlandC. I. (1958). Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 150-155. doi:10.1037/h0048784
46.
SpiersH. J.MaguireE. A. (2006). Thoughts, behaviors, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world. NeuroImage, 31, 1826-1840. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.037
47.
StrackF.MussweilerT. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437-446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.437
48.
SunY.PanZ.ShenL. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280-300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
49.
SunY.ShenL.PanZ. (2008). On the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 35, 257-278. doi:10.1177/0093650207313167
50.
TewksburyD. (2002). The role of comparison group size in the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 247-263. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.3.247
51.
TormalaZ. L.ClarksonJ. (2007). Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: The effect of source credibility in multiple message situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 559-571. doi:10.1177/0146167206296955
52.
WhiteH.DillonJ. (2000). Knowledge about others’ reaction to a public service announcement: The impact on self-persuasion and third-person perception. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 788-803.
53.
WoodJ. V.MichelaJ. L.GiordanoC. (2000). Downward comparison in everyday life: Reconciling self-enhancement models with the mood-cognition priming model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 563-579. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.563
