This study proposes a structural approach to examining online bridging and bonding social capital in a large virtual world. It tests the effects of individual players’ network brokerage and closure on their task performance and trust of other players. Bridging social capital is operationalized as brokerage, the extent to which one is tied to disconnected others, and bonding social capital as closure, the extent to which one is embedded in a densely connected group. Social networks were constructed from behavioral server logs of EverQuest II, a Massively Multiplayer Online Game. Results provided strong support for the structural model, demonstrating that players’ network brokerage positively predicted their task performance in the game and players embedded in closed networks were more likely to trust each other.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2.
BainbridgeW. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317, 472-476.
3.
BartleR. (2003). Designing virtual worlds. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Games.
4.
BaymN. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
5.
BeaudoinC. E. (2011). News effects on bonding and bridging social capital: An empirical study relevant to ethnicity in the united states. Communication Research, 38(2), 155-178.
6.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
7.
BurkeM.KrautR.MarlowC. (2011). Social capital on facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Paper presented at the The 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada.
8.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
BurtR. S. (2010). Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
BurtR. S. (2011). Structural holes in virtual worlds.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
12.
BurtR. S.SchottG. (1985). Relation contents in multiple networks. Social Science Research, 14, 287-308.
CastronovaE.WilliamsD.ShenC.RatanR.XiongL.HuangY.KeeganB. (2009). As real as real? Macroeconomic behavior in a large-scale virtual world. New Media & Society, 11, 685-707.
15.
ChoiS. M.KimY.SungY.SohnD. (2011). Bridging or bonding?Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 107-129.
16.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
17.
DucheneautN.YeeN.NickellE.MooreR. (2006, April22-28). “Alone together?” Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conon Human Factor in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada.
18.
DucheneautN.YeeN.NickellE.MooreR. J. (2007). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in world of warcraft. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA.
19.
EagleN.MacyM.ClaxtonR. (2010). Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328, 1029-1031.
20.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
21.
FischerC. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
FreemanL. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
23.
GanleyD.LampeC. (2009). The ties that bind: Social network principles in online communities. Decision Support Systems, 47, 266-274.
24.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
25.
GriffithsM. D.DaviesM. N. O.ChappellD. (2003). Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(1), 81-91.
26.
HamptonK. (2011). Comparing bonding and bridging ties for democratic engagement. Information, Communication and Society, 14, 510-528.
27.
HargittaiE.HinnantA. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602-621.
28.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
29.
HuangY.ShenC.WilliamsD.ContractorN. (2009). Virtually there: The role of proximity and homophily in virtual world networks. Paper presented at the IEEE SocialCom 2009 Symposium on Social Intelligence and Networking, Vancouver, Canada.
30.
KimD.SubramanianS. V.KawachiI. (2006). Bonding versus bridging social capital and their associations with self rated health: A multilevel analysis of 40 US communities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(2), 116-122.
31.
KobayashiT. (2010). Bridging social capital in online communities: Heterogeneity and social tolerance of online game players in Japan. Human Communication Research, 36, 546-569.
32.
KrautR.PattersonM.LundmarkV.KieslerS.MukopadhyayT.ScherlisW. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
LazerD.PentlandA.AdamicL.AralS.BarabasiA. L.BrewerD., . . .. (2009). Social science: Computational social science. Science, 323, 721-723.
35.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
36.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
37.
NardiB.HarrisJ. (2006). Strangers and friends: Collaborative play in World of Warcraft. Paper presented the 2006 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ′06), Banff, Alberta, Canada.
38.
NieN. H.ErbringL. (2002). Internet and society: A preliminary report. IT & Society, 1, 275-283.
39.
NorrisP. (2002). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 3-13.
40.
PodolnyJ. M.BaronJ. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693.
41.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1-24.
42.
PutnamR. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community (1st Touchstone ed.). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
43.
Quan-HaaseA.WellmanB. (2004). How does the internet affect social capital? In HuysmanM.WulfV. (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 113-132). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
44.
ReevesB.MaloneT.DriscollT. (2008). Leadership’s online labs. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 58-59.
45.
ResnickP. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In CarrollJ. (Ed.), HCI in the new mil (pp. 647-672). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
46.
ShenC.WilliamsD. (2011). Unpacking time online: Connecting internet and massively multiplayer online game use with psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 38(1), 123-149.
47.
SkoricM. M.TangS. W. H.LiaoY.PoorN. D. (2010). Technology as place. In AllanS. (Ed.), Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research (pp. 151-164). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
48.
SteinfieldC.EllisonN. B.LampeC. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434-445.
49.
SteinkuehlerC. (2004). Learning in massively multiplayer online games. In KafaiY.SandovalW.EnyedyN.NixonA.HerreraF. (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 521-528). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
TaylorT. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WellmanB.HaythornthwaiteC. (2002). The internet in everyday life. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
54.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
WilliamsD. (2006a). On and off the ‘net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 593-628.
56.
WilliamsD. (2010). The mapping principle, and a research framework for virtual worlds. Communication Theory, 20, 451-470.
57.
WilliamsD.DucheneautN.XiongL.ZhangY.YeeN.NickellE. (2006b). From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in world of warcraft. Games and Culture, 1, 338-361.
58.
WilliamsR. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645-646.
59.
YeeN. (2006). The demographics, motivations and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 309-329.
60.
ZaheerA.SodaG. (2009). Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 1-31.
