Drawing from primary socialization theory, we hypothesized that as Mexican-heritage youth engage in targeted parent-child communication against alcohol, they are more likely to disapprove of and consider the negative consequences of drinking alcohol. In turn, such antialcohol perceptions are likely to encourage them to intervene if a friend was to drink alcohol. The analyses were based on self-reported longitudinal data from 1,149 Mexican-heritage youth in sixth to eighth grades (M = 12 years, SD = .61). As males and females engaged in targeted parent-child communication against alcohol, they were more likely to consider the negative consequences of alcohol consumption. Consequently, they reported that they would be more likely to intervene by talking to the friend or an adult. Disapproving of alcohol consumption played a minor role for male and female Mexican-heritage youth.
BooneT. L.LefkowitzE. S. (2007). Mother-adolescent health communication: Are all conversations created equally?Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 1038-1047.
2.
BusseP.FishbeinM.BleakleyA.HennessyM. (2010). The role of communication with friends in sexual initiation. Communication Research, 37, 239-255.
3.
CervantesC. A. (2002). Explanatory emotion talk in Mexican immigrant and Mexican American families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 138-163.
4.
ChuangY-C.EnnettS.T.BaumanK.E.FosheeV.A. (2009) Relationships of adolescents’ perceptions of parental and peer behaviors with cigarette and alcohol use in differential neighborhood contexts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1388-1398.
5.
DeCarloL. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
6.
DelgadoM. Y.UpdegraffK. A.RoosaM. W.Umaña-TaylorA. J. (2011). Discrimination and Mexican-origin adolescents’ adjustment: The moderating roles of adolescents’, mothers’, and fathers’ cultural orientations and values. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 125-139.
7.
DonohewL.ClaytonR. R.SkinnerW. F.ColonS. (1999). Peer networks and sensation seeking: Some implications for primary socialization theory. Substance Use and Misuse, 34, 1013-1023.
8.
DunnM. E.GoldmanM. S. (1996). Empirical modeling of an alcohol expectancy memory network in elementary school children as a function of grade. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4, 209-217.
9.
ElderJ.CampbellN.LitrownikA.AyalaG.SlymenD.Parra-MedinaD.LovatoC.Y. (2000). Predictors of cigarette and alcohol susceptibility and use among Hispanic migrant adolescents. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 31, 115-123.
10.
ElekE.Miller-DayM.HechtM. L. (2006). Influences of personal, injunctive, and descriptive norms on early adolescent substance use. Journal of Drug Issues, 36, 147-172.
11.
EnnettS. T.BaumanK. E.FosheeV. A.PembertonM.HicksK. (2001). Parent–child communication about adolescent tobacco and alcohol use: What do parents say and does it affect youth behavior?Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 48-62.
12.
FischhoffB.BostromA.QuadrelM. J. (1993). Risk perception and communication. Annual Review of Public Health, 14, 183-203.
13.
FlanaganC. A.Elek-FiskE.GallayL. S. (2004). Friends don’t let friends …or do they? Developmental and gender differences in intervening in friends’ ATOD use. Journal of Drug Education, 34, 351-371.
14.
GrahamJ. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
15.
Guilamo-RamosV. (2010). Dominican and Puerto Rican mother-adolescent communication: Maternal self-disclosure and youth risk intentions. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32, 197-215.
16.
HansenW. B.GrahamJ. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414-430.
17.
HigginsG.E.RickettsM.L.MarcumC.D.MahoneyM. (2010). Primary socialization theory: An exploratory study of delinquent trajectories. Criminal Justice Studies, 23(2), 133-146.
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
19.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2010). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2009. Volume I: Secondary school students. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
20.
KafkaR. R.LondonP. (1991). Communication in relationships and adolescent substance use: The influence of parents and friends. Adolescence, 26, 587-598.
21.
KamJ. A. (2011). Identifying changes in youth’s subgroup membership over time based on their targeted communication about substance use with parents and friends. Human Communication Research, 37, 324-349.
22.
KamJ. A.MatsunagaM.HechtM. L.NdiayeK. (2009). Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use among youth of Mexican heritage. Prevention Science, 10, 41-53.
23.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LópezJ. S.MartinezJ. M.MartinA.MartinJ. M.MartinM. J.ScandroglioB. (2001). An exploratory multivariate approach to drug consumption patterns in young people based on primary socialization theory. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 1611-1649.
25.
MacKinnonD. P.FritzM. S.WilliamsJ.LockwoodC. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 384-389.
26.
MacKinnonD. P.JohnsonC. A.PentzM. A.DwyerJ. H.HansenW. B.FlayB. R.WangE. (1991). Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: One year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. Health Psychology, 10, 164-172.
27.
MenegatosL.LedermanL. C.HessA. (2010). Friends don’t let Jane hook up drunk: A qualitative analysis of participation in a simulation of college drinking-related decisions. Communication Education, 59, 374-388.
28.
Miller-DayM. (2002). Parent-adolescent communication about alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 604-616.
29.
Miller-DayM. (2008). Talking to youth about drugs: What do youth say about parental strategies?Family Relations, 57, 1-12.
30.
Miller-DayM.DoddA. H. (2004). Toward a descriptive model of parent-offspring communication about alcohol and other drugs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 69-91.
31.
Miller-DayM.KamJ. A. (2010). More than just openness: Developing and validating a measure of targeted parent-child communication about alcohol. Health Communication, 25, 293-302.
32.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
33.
OettingE. R. (1999). Primary socialization theory. Developmental stages, spirituality, goverment institutions, sensation seeking, and theoretical implications. V. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 947-982.
34.
OettingE. R.DonnermeyerJ. F. (1998). Primary socialization theory: The etiology of drug use and deviance. I. Substance Use & Misuse, 33, 995-1026.
35.
OettingE. R.DonnermeyerJ. F.DeffenbacherJ. L. (1998a). Primary socialization theory: The influence of the community on drug use and deviance. III. Substance Use & Misuse, 33, 995-1026.
36.
OettingE. R.DonnermeyerJ. F.TrimbleJ. E.BeauvaisF. (1998b). Primary socialization theory: Culture, ethnicity, and cultural identification. The links between culture and substance use. IV. Substance Use & Misuse, 33, 2075-2107.
37.
PaekH-J.ReberB.H.LariscyR.W. (2011). Roles of interpersonal and media socialization agents in adolescent self-reported health literacy: A health socialization perspective. Health Education Research, 26(1), 131-149.
38.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
39.
RealK.RimalR. N. (2007). Friends talk to friends about drinking: Exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Communication, 22, 169-180.
40.
Reid-QuiñonesK. (2011). Parent-child communication about substance use: Experiences of Latino emerging adults. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10156/3539
41.
ReimullerA.HussongA.EnnetS. T. (2011). The influence of alcohol-specific communication on adolescent alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences. Prevention Science, 12, 389-400.
42.
RoglerL. H. (1989). The meaning of culturally sensitive research in mental health. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 296-303.
43.
SchieffelinB. B.OchsE. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163-191.
44.
SlovicP. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689-701.
45.
StipekD.de la SotaA.WeishauptL. (1999). Life lessons: An embedded classroom approach to preventing high-risk behaviors among preadolescents. Elementary School Journal, 99, 433-451.
46.
SyvertsenA. K.FlanaganC. A.StoutM. D. (2009). Code of silence: Students’ perceptions of school climate and willingness to intervene in a peer’s dangerous plan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 219-232.
47.
Umaña-TaylorA. J.UpdegraffK. A.Gonzales-BackenM. A. (2010). Mexican-origin adolescent mothers’ stressors and psychosocial functioning: Examining ethnic identity affirmation and familism as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 140-157.
48.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). The American Community—Hispanics: 2004 (American Community Survey Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce
