Workplace friendships are linked to many important processes and outcomes such as employee satisfaction, career development, creativity, and decision-making influence (Sias, 2009). Research has examined how workplace peer friendships develop and deteriorate, but largely ignored their maintenance. The studies reported here addressed this void. Study 1 identified communicative tactics individuals use to maintain friendships with peer coworkers. Study 2 assessed the perceived politeness/positive face threat of the tactics. Study 3 examined the extent to which perceived politeness, task interdependence and individual attachment style predict the likelihood an individual will use specific maintenance tactics.
BartholomewK. (1993). From childhood to adult relationships: Attachment theory and research. In DuckS. (Ed.), Understanding relationship processes: Vol. 2. Learning about relationships (pp. 30-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BartholomewK.HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
3.
BippusA. M.RollinE. (2003). Attachment style differences in relational maintenance and conflict behaviors: Friends’ perceptions. Communication Reports, 16, 113-124.
4.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. I. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
BridgeK.BaxterL. A. (1992). Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 200-225.
6.
BrownP.LevinsonS. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CruzC. A.ShaferW. E.StrawserJ. R. (2000). A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioner’s ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 223-244.
8.
CupachW. R.CarsonC. L. (2002). Characteristics and consequences of interpersonal complaints associated with perceived face threat. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 443-462.
9.
DaintonM. (2007). Attachment and marital maintenance. Communication Quarterly, 55, 283-298.
10.
DindiaK. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In CanaryD. J.DaintonM. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
DindiaK.CanaryD. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163-173.
FengB.BurlesonB.R. (2008). The effects of argument explicitness on responses to advice in supportive interactions. Communication Research, 35, 849-874.
15.
FisherR. J. (1999). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 303-316.
16.
FritzJ. H. (2009). Rudeness and incivility in the workplace. In MorrisonR.WrightS. (Eds.), Friends and enemies in organisations: A work psychology perspective (pp. 168-194). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
18.
GuerreroL. K.BachmanG. F. (2006). Associations among relational maintenance behaviors, attachment-style categories and attachment dimensions. Communication Studies, 57, 341-361.
19.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
20.
KiggunduM. N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 145-172.
21.
KlineT. J. B. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
KramK. E.IsabellaL. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 110-132.
23.
KramerM. W. (1994). Uncertainty reduction during job transitions: An exploratory study of the communication experiences of newcomers and transferees. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 384-412.
24.
LeeJ. (1998). Maintenance communication in superior-subordinate relationships: An exploratory investigation of group social context and the “Pelz Effect.”Southern Communication Journal, 63, 144-159.
25.
LeeJ.JablinF. M. (1995). Maintenance communication in superior-subordinate work relationships. Human Communication Research, 22, 220-257.
26.
LimT. S. (1994). Facework and interpersonal relationships. In Ting-ToomeyS. (Ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues (pp. 209-229). New York: State University of New York Press.
27.
MarksS. R. (1994). Intimacy in the public realm: The case of co-workers. Social Forces, 72, 843-858.
28.
MillerC. W.RoloffM. E. (2007). The effect of face loss on willingness to confront hurtful messages from romantic partners. Southern Communication Journal, 72, 247-263.
29.
RawlinsW. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
30.
SheaB.C.PearsonJ. C. (1986). The effects of relationship type, partner intent, and gender on the selection of relationship maintenance strategies. Communication Monographs, 53, 352-364.
31.
SiasP. M. (2009). Organizing relationships: Traditional and emerging perspectives on workplace relationships. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
32.
SiasP. M.CahillD. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62, 273-299.
33.
SiasP. M.GallagherE. (2009). Developing and maintaining workplace relationships. In MorrisonR.WrightS. (Eds.), Friends and enemies in organisations: A work psychology Perspective (pp. 78-100). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
SiasP. M.PerryT. (2004). Disengaging from workplace relationships: A research note. Human Communication Research, 30, 589-602.
35.
SiasP. M.HeathR. G.PerryT.SilvaD.FixB. (2004). Narratives of workplace friendship deterioration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 321-340.
36.
SiasP. M.SmithG.AvdeyevaT. (2003). Sex and sex-composition differences and similarities in peer workplace friendship development. Communication Studies, 54, 322-340.
37.
SigmanS. J. (1995). Order and continuity in human relationships: A social communication approach to defining “relationship.” In Leeds-HurwitzW. (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 188-200). New York, NY: Guilford.
38.
SimonE. P.BaxterL. A. (1993). Attachment-style differences in relationship maintenance strategies. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 416-430.
39.
TaggarS.HainesV. Y.III. (2006). I need you, you need me: A model of initiated task interdependence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 211-230.
40.
WaldronV. R. (2003). Relationship maintenance in organizational settings. In CanaryD. J.DaintonM. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 163-184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
WeickK. W. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
WhitmeyerJ. M. (2002). A deductive approach to friendship networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 26, 147-165.
43.
WilsonS. R.KunkelA. D.RobsonS. J.OlofuwoteJ. O.SolizJ. (2008). Identity implications of relationship (re)definition goals: An analysis of face threats and facework as young adults initiate, intensify and disengage from romantic relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 32-61.
