This study examines the impact of polling news in the 2008 Taiwan presidential election from a third-person effect perspective. Results of a survey using a random sample of 1,097 respondents indicate that they perceived news about election polls to have a greater effect on others than themselves, regardless of whether the effects were perceived as negative or positive. Furthermore, findings show that attention to election polling news enhanced the perceived positive effects on self and others. Findings also point to a link between poll credibility and perceived effects on self and others. The less credible elections polls are perceived, the larger is the self—other perceptual gap. Finally, concern about the negative effects of election polling news on others is found to motivate respondents to consider protective behavior. However, findings show that perceived positive effects of such news on self resulted in intention to engage in campaign discourse. Theoretical implications of the findings to advance the third-person effect research are discussed.
Banning, S.A. ( 2007). Third-person perceptions and political participation . Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 785-800.
2.
Banning, S.A., & Sweetser, K.D. (2007). How much do they think it affects them and whom do they believe? Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media. Communication Quarterly, 55, 451-466.
3.
Bradburn, N., & Sudman, S. ( 1988). Polls and surveys: Understanding what they tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
4.
Broh, A. ( 1980). Horse-race journalism: Reporting the polls in the 1976 presidential elections. Public Opinion Quarter, 44, 514-529.
5.
Brosius, H., & Engel, D. ( 1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes toward media influence?International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 8, 142-162.
6.
Chaffee, S.H., & Schleuder, J. ( 1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107.
7.
Chaffee, S.H., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G. ( 1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21, 305-324.
8.
Chen, M.B. ( 2008). Will Ma win the presidential election?Not necessarily. Available from http://aw55.blogspot.com/2008/03/blog-post_1345.html
9.
Cohen, J., & Davis, R. ( 1991). Third-person effects and the differential impact in negative political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 680-688.
10.
David, P., & Johnson, M.A. ( 1998). The role of self in third-person effects about body image . Journal of Communication, 48, 37-58.
11.
David, P., Liu, K., & Myser, M. ( 2004). Methodological artifact or persistent bias? Testing the robustness of the third-person and reverse third-person effects for alcohol messages. Communication Research, 31, 206-233.
12.
Davison, W.P. ( 1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
13.
de Vreese, C.H., & Semetko, H.A. ( 2002). Public perception of polls and support for restrictions on the publication of polls: Denmark’s 2000 euro referendum. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 410-433.
14.
DeLorme, D.E., Huh, J., & Reid, L.N. ( 2006). Age differences in how consumers behave following exposure to DTC advertising. Health Communication, 20, 255-265.
15.
DeLorme, D.E., Huh, J., & Reid, L.N. ( 2007). "Others are influenced, but not me": Older adults’ perceptions of DTC prescription drug advertising effects. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 135-151.
16.
Drew, D., & Weaver, D. ( 2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly , 83, 25-42.
17.
Eveland, W., & McLeod, D. (1999). The effect of social desirability on perceived media impact: Implications for third-person perceptions . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 315-333.
18.
Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. ( 1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451-462.
19.
Golan, G., Banning, S., & Lundy, L. ( 2008). Likelihood to vote, candidate choice the third-person effect: Behavioral implications of political advertising in the 2004 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 278-290.
20.
Gunther, A.C. ( 1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person. Communication Research, 18, 335-372.
21.
Gunther, A.C. ( 1995). Overrating the x-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication , 45, 27-38.
22.
Gunther, A.C., & Mundy, P. ( 1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
23.
Gunther, A.C., & Storey, J.D. ( 2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199-215.
24.
Gunther, A.C., & Thorson, E. ( 1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcement: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574-596.
25.
Hagstrom, J. ( 1992). Political consulting: A guide for reporters and citizens . New York: The Freedom Forum Media Studies Center.
26.
Henriksen, L., & Flora, J.A. ( 1999). Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research , 26, 643-665.
27.
Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. ( 2002). Parents’ responses to television violence: The third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship . Media Psychology, 4, 231-252.
28.
Hoffner, C., Buchanan, M., Anderson, J., Hubbs, L., Kamigaki, S., Kowalczyk, L., et al. (1999). Support for censorship of television violence . Communication Research, 26, 726-742.
29.
Huh, J., DeLorme, D.E., & Reid, L.N. ( 2004). Media credibility and informativeness of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Health Marketing Quarterly , 21(3), 27-61.
30.
Huh, J., DeLorme, D.E., & Reid, L.N. ( 2005). Factors affecting trust in on-line prescription drug information and impact of trust on behavior following exposure to DTC advertising . Journal of Health Communication, 10, 711-731.
31.
Johansson, B. ( 2005). The third-person effect: Only a media perception ? Nordicom Review, 26(1), 81-94.
32.
Jones, E. ( 1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 104-117.
33.
Kiousis, S. ( 2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 381-403.
34.
Lavrakas, P., Holley, J., & Miller, P. ( 1991). Public reactions to polling news during the 1988 presidential election campaign. In P. Lavrakas & J. Holley (Eds.), Polling and presidential election coverage (pp. 151-183). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
35.
Lavrakas, P., & Traugott, M. ( 2000). Election polls, the news media and democracy. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
36.
Lee, B., & Tamborini, R. ( 2005). Third person effect and Internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and self efficacy. Journal of Communication , 55, 292-310.
37.
Lo, V.H., Hou, C.C., Teng, L.P., & Lee, W.L. ( 2004). Partisan bias in television coverage of the 2004 presidential election in Taiwan. Journal of Radio & Television , 84, 1-21.
38.
Lo, V.H., Neilan, E., & King, P. ( 1998).Television coverage of the 1995 legislative election in Taiwan. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 340-355
39.
Lo, V.H., & Paddon, A.R. ( 2001). Third-person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication, 11, 120-142.
40.
Lo, V.H., & Wei, R. ( 2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet . Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 46, 13-33.
41.
Mason, H., Frankovic, K., & Jamieson, K. ( 2001). CBS news coverage of election night 2000. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania .
42.
McLeod, D.M., Detenber, B.H., & Eveland, W.P. ( 2001). Behind the third-person effects: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication , 51, 678-695.
43.
McLeod, D.M., Eveland, W.P., & Nathanson, A.I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect . Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
44.
Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. ( 2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing . Communication Research, 29, 320-359.
45.
O’Cass, A., & Pecotich, A. ( 2005). The dynamics of voter behavior and influence processes in electoral markets: A consumer behavior perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58, 406-413.
46.
Paek, H.J., Pan, Z.D., Sun, Y., Abisaid, J., & Houden. ( 2005). The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Communication Research, 32, 143-170.
47.
Pan, Z., Abisaid, J., Paek, H., Sun, Y., & Houden, D. ( 2005). Exploring the perceptual gap in perceived effects of media reports of opinion polls. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 340-350.
48.
Park, S. ( 2005). The influence of presumed media influence on women’s desire to be thin. Communication Research, 32, 594-614.
49.
Patterson, T. ( 2005). Of polls, mountains: U.S. journalists and their use of election surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 716-724.
50.
Paul, B., Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. ( 2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 57-85.
51.
Perloff, R.M. ( 1993). Third-person effect research 1983-1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 5, 167-184.
52.
Perloff, R.M. ( 1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis . Media Psychology, 1, 353-378.
53.
Pinkleton, B.E., Austin, E.W., & Fortman, K.K.J. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 34-49.
54.
Price, V., Huang, L.N., & Tewksbury, D. ( 1997). Third-person effects of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly , 74, 525-540.
55.
Price, V., & Stroud, N.J. ( 2005). Polls in election 2000: Public attitudes, perceived impact, and support for restricting election-night projections. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 393-421.
56.
Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Huang, L.N. ( 1998). Third-person effects on publication of a Holocaust denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48, 3-26.
57.
Reid, S.A., Byrne, S., Brundidge, J.S., Shoham, M.D., & Marlow, M.L. ( 2007). A critical test of self-enhancement, exposure, and self-categorization explanations for first-and third-person perceptions . Human Communication Research, 33, 143-162.
58.
Rhee, J.W. ( 1996). How polls drive campaign coverage: The Gallup/CNN/USA Today tracking poll and USA Today’s coverage of the 1992 presidential campaign. Political Communication, 13, 213-229.
59.
Rojas, H., Shah, D.V., & Faber, R.J. ( 1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186.
60.
Rosenstiel, T. ( 2005). Political polling and the new media culture: A case of more being less. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 698-715.
61.
Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C.T. ( 1990). The "other" as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U. S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 345-368.
62.
Salwen, M.B. ( 1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285.
63.
Salwen, M.B., & Dupagne, M. ( 2001). Third-person perception of television violence: The role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychology, 3, 211-236.
64.
Salwen, M.B., & Driscoll, P.D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47, 60-78.
65.
Schmierbach, M.G., Boyle, M.P., & McLeod, D.M. (2008). Understanding media effects perceptions: Comparing four common analytical approaches in third-person research . Mass Communication and Society, 11, 1-21.
66.
Soh, H., Reid, L.N., & King, K.W. ( 2007). Trust in different advertising media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 455-476.
67.
Sotirovic, M., & McLeod, J. (2004). Knowledge as understanding: The information processing approach to political learning. In L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 357-394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68.
Sun, Y., Shen, L., & Pan, Z. ( 2008). On the behavioral component of the third-person effect . Communication Research, 35, 257-278.
69.
Tiedge, J.T., Silverblatt, A., Havice, M.J., & Rosenfeld, R. ( 1991). Discrepancy between perceived first-person and perceived third-person mass media effects. Journalism Quarterly , 68, 141-154.
70.
Traugott, M.W. ( 2003). Can we trust the polls? The Brookings Review, 21(3), 8-11.
71.
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. ( 2003). On the effect of the "third-person effect": Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communications, 53, 711-727.
72.
Vallone, R.P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M.R. ( 1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585.
73.
Weaver, D., & Drew, D. ( 1995). Voter learning in the 1992 presidential election: Did the "nontraditional" media and debates matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 7-17.
74.
Wei, R., & Lo, V.H. ( 2007). The third-person effects of political attack ads in the 2004 U. S. presidential election. Media Psychology , 9, 367-388.
75.
Wei, R., & Lo, V.H. ( 2008). News media use and knowledge about the 2006 U.S. midterms elections: Why exposure matters in voter learning. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 347-362.
76.
Wei, R., Lo, V.H., & Lu, H.Y. ( 2008). Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions . American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 261-277.
77.
Willnat, L., He, Z., Takeshita, T., & Lopez-Escobar, E. (2002). Perceptions of foreign media influence in Asia and Europe: The third-person effect and media imperialism . International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 175-192.
78.
Youn, S., Faber, R.J., & Shah, D.V. ( 2000). Restricting gambling advertising and the third-person effect. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 633-649.
