Expertise Directory Development,Shared Task Interdependence,and Strength of Communication Network Ties as Multilevel Predictors of Expertise Exchange in Transactive Memory Work Groups
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2010
Expertise Directory Development,Shared Task Interdependence,and Strength of Communication Network Ties as Multilevel Predictors of Expertise Exchange in Transactive Memory Work Groups
Building on Kozlwoski and Klein’s emergence framework, this research developed and tested a set of multilevel hypotheses regarding individual and team transactive memory processes in work teams. Literature from social psychology suggested hypotheses on how shared task interdependence influences individual expertise exchange. Social network theory suggested hypotheses that individual expertise exchange is channeled according to communication tie strength. Using data collected from 218 individuals from 18 organizational teams, the proposed hypotheses were tested using hierarchical linear modeling techniques. The results showed that at the individual level the relationship between directory development and expertise exchange was mediated by communication tie strength and moderated by shared task interdependence.Team-level variables also were significantly related to individual-level outcomes such that individual expertise exchange happened more frequently in teams with well-developed team-level expertise directories, as well as with higher team communication tie strength and shared task interdependence.
Anand, V.Manz, C.C., & Glick, W.H. ( 1998). An organizational memory approach to information management . Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 796-809.
2.
Argote, L., & Ophir, R. ( 2002). Intraorganizational learning. In J. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 181-207). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
3.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Bollen, K. ( 1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables . New York: John Wiley.
5.
Borgatti, S.P., Carley, K.M., & Krackhardt, D. (2006). On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks , 28, 124-136.
Brandon, D.P., & Hollingshead, A.B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15, 633-644.
8.
Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1998). Competing on the Edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
Burton-Jones, A., & Gallivan, M.J. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31, 657-679.
10.
Byrne, B.M. ( 1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Carlson, P.J., & Davis, G.B. ( 1998). An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: From "self" to "other" orientation. MIS Quarterly , 22, 335-362.
12.
Casciaro, T., Carley, K.M., & Krackhardt, D. (1999). Positive affectivity and accuracy in social network perception. Motivation and Emotion , 23, 285-306.
13.
Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128.
14.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
15.
Contractor, N. ( 2009). Emergence of multidimensional networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 743-747.
16.
Enders, C.K., & Tofighi, D. ( 2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological methods , 12, 121-138.
17.
Fulk, J., Monge, P., & Hollingshead, A.B. (2005). Knowledge resource sharing in dispersed multinational teams: Three theoretical lenses. In D. Shapiro, M. A. V. Glinow, & J. Cheng (Eds.), Managing multinational teams: Cultural, organizational, and national influences . (pp. 155-188). Amsterdam: Elsevier .
18.
Geen, R.G. ( 1991). Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology , 42, 377-399.
19.
Gibson, C.B., Zellmer-Bruhn, M.E., & Schwab, D.P. ( 2003). Team effectiveness in multinational organizations: Evaluation across contexts. Group & Organization Management , 28, 444-474.
20.
Granovetter, M. ( 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
21.
Gulati, R. ( 1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85-112.
22.
Hansen, M.T. ( 1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
23.
Hansen, M.T., Podolny, J.M., & Pfeffer, J. ( 2001). So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 18, 21-57.
24.
Hayes, A.F. ( 2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385-410.
25.
Hofmann, D.A., & Gavin, M.B. ( 1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear modeling: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management , 24, 623-641.
26.
Hollingshead, A.B. ( 1998). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 34, 423-442.
27.
Hollingshead, A.B. ( 2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81, 1080-1089.
28.
Hollingshead, A.B., & Contractor, N.S. (2002). New media and organizing at the group level. In S. Livingstone, & L. Lievrouw (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 221-235). London: Sage.
29.
Hollingshead, A.B., & Fraidin, S.N. ( 2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 39, 355-363.
30.
Kalman, M.E., Monge, P., Fulk, J., & Heino, R. ( 2002). Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communication Research , 29, 125-154.
31.
Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing : A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
32.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. ( 1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
33.
Kline, R.B. ( 1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling . New York: Guilford.
34.
Kozlowski, S., & Klein, K.J. ( 2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Krackhardt, D. ( 1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria, & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Express.
36.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Lawler, E.J., Thye, S.R., & Yoon, J. ( 2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange . American Journal of Sociology, 106, 616-657.
38.
Meade, A.W., & Eby, L.T. ( 2007). Using indices of group agreement in multilevel construct validation. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 75-96.
39.
Moreland, R. ( 1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson , J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Moreland, R., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. ( 1998). Training people to work in groups. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath , J. Edwards, E. Posavac, F. B. Bryant , & Y. Suarez-Balcazar, et al. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 36-60). New York: Plenum.
41.
Moreland, R., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117-133.
42.
Morgeson, F.P., & Hofmann, D.A. ( 1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-265.
43.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. ( 1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
44.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. ( 1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
O’Reilly, C.A. ( 1982). Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 756-771.
46.
Palazzolo, E.T. ( 2005). Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 32(6), 726-761.
47.
Palazzolo, E.T., Serb, D., She, Y., Su, C., & Contractor, N.S. (2006). Co-evolution of communication and knowledge networks as transactive memory systems: Using computational models for theoretical integration and extensions. Communication Theory. 16, 223-250.
48.
Pavitt, C. ( 2003). Why we still have to be reductionists about group memory . Human Communication Research, 29, 624-629.
49.
Polanyi, M. ( 1967). The tacit dimension. New York : Anchor.
50.
Poole, S.M., & DeSanctis, G. ( 1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk, & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-191). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. ( 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. ( 2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly , 48, 240-267.
53.
Seibert, S.E. ( 2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-237.
Snijders, T.A.B., & Bosker, R.J. ( 1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage .
56.
Stasser, G. ( 1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion . In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48-57). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
57.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. ( 2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 304-313.
58.
Thompson, J.D. ( 1967). Organizations in action. New York : McGraw-Hill.
59.
Tindale, R.S., & Anderson, E.M. (1998). Small group research and applied social psychology. In R. S. Tindale , L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 1-8). New York: Plenum.
60.
Uzzi, B. ( 1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.
61.
Uzzi, B. ( 1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly , 42, 35-67.
62.
Wageman, R. ( 1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
63.
Wageman, R., & Baker, G. ( 1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139-158.
64.
Wegner, D.M. ( 1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of group mind. In B. Mullen, & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York/Berlin : Springer-Verlag .
65.
Wegner, D.M. ( 1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory . Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
66.
Wegner, D.M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. ( 1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
67.
Weick, K.E., & Ashford, S.J. ( 2000). Learning in organizations. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 704-731). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
Yuan, Y.C. ( 2009). Social capital and the development of group transactive memory systems. Saarbrűcken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Műller.
69.
Yuan, Y.C., Fulk, J., & Monge, P.R. ( 2007). Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 34, 131-155.
70.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. ( 1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of inter-organizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science , 9, 141-159.
