A quasiexperiment tested competing hypotheses regarding escapist media use and alternative coping motivations in media selection behavior. For 287 participants, personal satisfaction levels for five life domains were assessed. In an ostensibly unrelated study, the participants browsed through online content in which some section topics corresponded to the life domains. Selective exposure was unobtrusively logged by software. Lower satisfaction with college and career situation and with personal financial situation was associated with longer exposure to information about college and career issues. Among respondents in a romantic relationship, higher satisfaction with personal romantic situation led to longer reading times for articles about romance issues, whereas among single respondents, lower satisfaction with one's romantic situation was connected to longer reading of such content. Satisfaction with own health and exposure to health information showed a curvilinear pattern, as low and high satisfaction produced lower exposure than moderate satisfaction.
Adorno, T.W., & Horkheimer, M. (1947) Dialectic of enlightenment . London: Verso.
2.
Anderson, D.R., Collins, P.A., Schmitt, K.L., & Jacobvitz, R.S. (1996). Stressful life events and television viewing. Communication Research, 23(3), 243-260.
3.
Atkin, C. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking . In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (pp. 205-242). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Brosius, H.-B., Roßmann, R., & Elnain, A. (1999). Alltagsbelastung und Fernsehnutzung [Daily strains and TV use]. In U. Hasebrink & P. Rössler (Eds.), Publikumsbindungen: Medienrezeption zwischen Individualisierung und Integration [Media audience commitment: Media reception between individualization and integration] (pp. 167-187). München, Germany: Reinhard Fischer.
5.
Byrne, D. (1964). Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality . In Maher, B. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 1, pp. 169-220). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267-283.
Endler, N.S., & Parker, J.D.A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 844-854.
9.
Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Schumacher, J., & Brähler, E. (2000). Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ): Handanweisung [Life satisfaction questionnaire (FLZ): Manual]. Göttingen , Germany: Hogrefe.
10.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1985). If it changes it must be process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150-170.
11.
Fry, R., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (2005). Effects of coping information and value affirmation on responses to a perceived health threat. Health Communication, 17(2), 133-147.
12.
Henning, B., & Vorderer, P. (2001). Psychological escapism: Predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication , 51(1), 100-120.
13.
Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect . Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
14.
Katz, E., & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as escape: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377-388.
15.
Knobloch, S., Weisbach, K., & Zillmann, D. (2004). Love lamentation in pop songs: Music for unhappy lovers? Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 16(2), 116-124.
16.
Knobloch, S., & Zillmann, D. (2003). Appeal of love themes in popular music. Psychological Reports, 93, 653-658.
17.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2006). Mood management: Theory, evidence, and advancements . In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), The psychology of entertainment (pp. 239-254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Krohne, H. W. (Ed.). (1993a). Attention and avoidance. Strategies in coping with aversiveness. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
19.
Krohne, H.W. (1993b). Vigilance and cognitive avoidance as concepts in coping research. In H. W. Krohne (Ed.), Attention and avoidance. Strategies in coping with aversiveness (p. 19-50). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
20.
Kubey, R.W. (1986). Television use in everyday life: Coping with unstructured time. Journal of Communication, 36(6), 108-123.
21.
Kubey, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Viewing as cause, as effect, and as habit. In R. Kubey & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience (pp. 119-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
23.
Mares, M.-L., & Cantor, J. (1992). Elderly viewers` responses to televised portrayals of old age. Communication Research, 19(4), 459-478.
24.
Moskalenko, S., & Heine, S.J. (2003). Watching your troubles away: Television viewing as a stimulus for subjective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 76-85.
25.
Pearlin, L.I. (1959). Social and personal stress and escape television viewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(2), 255-259.
26.
Pew Research Center. (2006). Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership. Retrieved November 7, 2007, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=1065
27.
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Viking.
28.
Rosch, S.C., Adams, L., Hines, A., Palmores, A., Vyas, P., Tran, C., et al. (2005). Coping with prostate cancer: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28(3), 281-293.
29.
Rossmann, R. (2006). Selective-exposure-designs in der Zappingforschung [Selective exposure designs in zapping research]. Munich , Germany: Dr. Hut.
30.
Schmitz, B., & Lewandrowski, U. (1993). Trägt das Fernsehen zur Regulierung von Stimmungen bei? Intraindividuelle Analysen zur "Moodmanagement"-Hypothese auf der Grundlage eines dynamischtransaktionalen Modells [Does TV consumption contribute to mood management? Intra-individual analyses of the mood management hypothesis on the basis of a dynamic-transactional model]. Medienpsychologie, 5(1), 64-84.
31.
Schramm, H., & Wirth, W. (2008). A case for an integrative view on affect regulation through media usage. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 33(1), 27-46.
32.
Solberg Nes, L., & Segerstrom, S.C. (2006). Dispositional optimism and coping: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 235-251.
33.
Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1985). The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 4(3), 249-288.
34.
Tasche, K. (1996). Die selektive Zuwendung zu Fernsehprogrammen. Entwicklung und Erprobung von Indikatoren der selektiven Nutzung von politischen Informationssendungen des Fernsehens [Selective use of TV programs: Development and testing of indicators for selective use of political information on television] . Munich, Germany: Fischer.
35.
Trepte, S., Zapfe, S., & Sudhoff, W. (2001). Orientierung und Problembewältigung durch TV-Talkshows: Empirische Ergebnisse und Erklärungsansätze [Orientation and problem-solving through TV talk shows: Empirical results and theoretical approaches]. Zeitschrift für Medien-psychologie, 13(2), 73-84.
36.
Vorderer, P., & Knobloch, S. (2000). Drama, suspense, and conflict. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 59-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum.
37.
Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices . American Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 327-340.
38.
Zillmann, D. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 23 (pp. 103-123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
