The warranting principle pertains to impression formation in Internet communication. It posits that perceivers' judgments about a target rely more heavily on information which the targets themselves cannot manipulate than on self-descriptions. Two experiments employed mock-up profiles resembling the Internet site, Facebook, to display self-generated clues and to display other-generated clues about a Facebook user. The first experiment (N = 115) tested perceptions of extraversion. Although warranting was supported, rival explanations (negativity and additivity) also pertained. The second experiment (N = 125) tested perceptions of physical attractiveness. Friends' comments overrode self-comments, supporting warranting theory exclusively. Implications concern boundary-setting research for warranting, and potential effects of social comments on a variety of new information forms.
Atkin, C.K. (1972). Anticipated communication and mass media information-seeking . Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 188-199.
2.
Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
3.
Berry, D.S., & Miller, K.M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62-77.
4.
Brym, R.J., & Lenton, R.L. (2001). Love online: A report on digital dating in Canada . Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://www.nelson.com/nelson/harcourt/sociology/newsociety3e/loveonline.pdf
5.
Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., Dillman, L., & Walther, J.B. (1995). Interpersonal deception: IV. Effects of suspicion on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Human Communication Research, 22, 163-196.
6.
Burgoon, J.K., & Saine, T. (1978). The unspoken dialogue: An introduction to nonverbal communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Burton, M.C., & Walther, J.B. (2001). The value of web log data in use-based web design and testing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(3). Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://www.blackwellsynergy.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00121.x
8.
Caplan, S.E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721-736.
9.
Carlson, J.R., George, J.F., Burgoon, J.K., Adkins, M., & White, C.H. (2004). Deception in computer-mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 5-28.
10.
Chaffee, S.H., & Mutz, D.C. (1988). Comparing mediated and interpersonal communication data. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree. (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 19-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Cornwell, B., & Lundgren, D.C. (2001). Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 197-211.
12.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.
13.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1991). NEO-FFI Form S. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
David, C., Cappella, J.N., & Fishbein, M. (2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements . Communication Theory, 16, 118-140.
16.
DeNeve, K.M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197-229.
17.
Dion, K.K. (1981). Physical attractiveness, sex roles and heterosexual attraction. In M. Cook (Ed.), The bases of human sexual attraction (pp. 3-22). London: Academic Press.
18.
Dion, K.K. (1986). Stereotyping based on physical attractiveness: Issues and conceptual perspectives. In C. P. Herman, M. P. Zanna, & E. T. Higgins. (Eds.), Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 3, pp. 7-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Dion, K.K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
20.
Donath, J. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community . In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29-59). New York: Routledge.
21.
Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S.T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56, 255-277.
22.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html
Fiske, S.T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-908.
25.
Frankel, M.S., & Sang, S. (1999, November). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet: A report of a workshop June 10-11, 1999. Retrieved May 15, 2002, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf
Garcia, S., Stinson, L., Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., & Briggs, S. (1991). Shyness and attractiveness in mixed-sex dyads . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 35-49.
28.
Gibbs, J.L., Ellison, N.B., & Heino, R.D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 1-26.
29.
Gill, A.J., & Oberlander, J. (2003). Perception of e-mail personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; Neuroticism is a worry. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 456-461). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Hamilton, D.L., & Zanna, M.P. (1972). Differential weighting of favorable and unfavorable attributes in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 204-212.
31.
Hancock, J.T., & Dunham, P.J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325-347.
32.
Hancock, J.T., Thom-Santelli, J., & Ritchie, T. (2004). Deception and design: The impact of communication technologies on lying behavior. Proceedings, Conference on Computer Human Interaction, 6, 130-136.
33.
Hayes, D.P., & Meltzer, L. (1972). Interpersonal judgments based on talkativeness: Fact or artifact? Sociometry, 35, 538-561.
34.
Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). `I've never clicked this much with anyone in my life': Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media & Society, 6, 487-506.
35.
Jones, E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Kellermann, K. (1984). The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction. Communication Monographs, 51, 37-55.
37.
Kellermann, K. (1989). The negativity effect in interaction: It's all in your point of view. Human Communication Research, 16, 147-183.
38.
Kellermann, K., & Reynolds, R. (1990). When ignorance is bliss: The role of motivation to reduce uncertainty in uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 17, 5-75.
39.
Klein, J.G. (1991). Negativity effects in impression formation: A test in the political arena. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 412-418.
40.
Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2007, April-May). A familiar face(book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA.
41.
Leventhal, H., & Singer, D. (1964). Cognitive complexity, impression formation, and impression change. Journal of Personality, 32, 210-226.
42.
Levy, S. (2005, October). The trend spotter. WIRED, 13.10. Retrieved August 6, 2007 from, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.10/oreilly.html
43.
McCroskey, J.C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-95.
44.
McCroskey, J.C., Hamilton, P.R., & Weiner, A.M. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 42-52.
45.
McCroskey, J.C., & McCain, T.A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
46.
Parks, M.R., & Adelman, M.B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 55-79.
47.
Ramirez, Jr., A. (2007). The effect of anticipated future interaction and initial impression valence on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Studies, 58, 53-70.
48.
Ramirez, Jr., A., Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K., & Sunnafrank , M. (2002). Information seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213-228.
49.
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9, 79-101.
50.
Roberts, L.D., & Parks, M.R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. Information, Communication, and Society, 2, 521-540.
51.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L., & Rubin, D.B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Smith, M.A. (1999). Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Mapping the social structure of the Usenet. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 195-219). New York: Routledge.
54.
Stone, A.R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
Tidwell, L.C., & Walther, J.B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
56.
Toma, C.L., Hancock, J.T., & Ellison, N.B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
57.
Tong, S.T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J.B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549. Retrieved December 23, 2008, from www.3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119414155/PDFSTART
58.
van Gelder, L. (1991). The strange case of the electronic lover. In C. Dunlop & R. Kling (Eds.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 364-375). Boston: Academic Press.
59.
Vazire, S., & Gosling, S.D. (2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 87, 123-132.
60.
Vinchur, A.J., Schippmann, J.S., Switzer, F.S., & Roth, P.L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586-597.
61.
Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Walther, J.B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
63.
Walther, J.B. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 205-216.
64.
Walther, J.B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition . Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
65.
Walther, J.B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support . In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp 153-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
66.
Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
Walther, J.B., & Tidwell, L.C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378.
68.
Walther, J.B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36-65.
69.
Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S.T. (2008). The role of friends' behavior on evaluations of individuals' Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
70.
Wang, Z., Walther, J.B., Pingree, S., & Hawkins, R. (2008). Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups. Health Communication, 23, 358-368.
71.
Webster, E.C. (1964). Decision making in the employment interview. Montreal: McGill University Industrial Relations Center .
72.
Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167-194). New York: Routledge .
73.
Xia, M., Huang, Y., Duan, W., & Whinston, A.B. (2007). Implicit many-to-one communication in online communities. In C. Steinfield, B. T. Pentland, M. Ackerman , & N. Contractor. (Eds.), Communities and technologies 2007: Proceedings of the third communities and technologies conference (pp. 265-274). London: Springer.
