“Blame game” coverage relates to news about actors in the public arena as they try to deflect, deflate, or diffuse blame for negative events so that the public does not view them as the cause of harm. The current research looks at formal differences in news presentations and how they affect causal attributions of news readers and subsequent support for agents in the news and policy preferences. In Study 1, verb voice was manipulated in four news stories with one key agent; when active voice was used to describe actions relative to an event, that agent was more seen as the cause of that event than when passive voice was used. Study 2 demonstrated, based on three news reports about conflicts, that facets of causal attributions—perceived control and intention— affect perceptions of agents' traits, as well as assent and support for the changes targeted by the news agents.
After failures, officials play blame game. (2005, September 5). The New York Times, p. 1.
2.
Alicke, M.D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 556-574.
3.
Anastasio, P.A., & Costa, D.M. (2004). Twice hurt: How newspaper coverage may reduce empathy and engender blame for female victims of crime. Sex Roles, 51(9/10), 535-542.
4.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Baxter, C. (1994). Dysfunctional narratives, or "Mistakes were made ." Ploughshares, 64(20), 200-205.
6.
A blame game: GOP and Davis differ on cause of budget crisis. (2002 , April 25). Associated Press State & Local Wire.
7.
Blame game has two sets of standards. (2002, January 18). The New York Times, p. B1.
8.
Broken levees and the Katrina blame game. (2005, September 14). The Washington Times, p. A18.
9.
Bush takes blame for government's failures in disaster. (2005 , September 14). Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, p. A1.
10.
Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm . Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
11.
As gasoline prices rise, auto and oil firms blame each other. ( 2006, April 12). The Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
12.
A gumbo of blame for the New Orleans debacle. (2005, September 8). The Washington Post, p. A28.
13.
Hassin, R.R., Bargh, J.A., & Uleman, J.S. (2002). Spontaneous causal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 515-522.
14.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Henley, N.M., & Miller, M. (1995). Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence: Agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language & Social Psychology , 14(1/2), 60-84.
16.
Hilton, D.J., Mathes, R.H., & Trabasso, T.R. (1992). The study of causal explanation in natural language: Analyzing reports of the Challenger disaster in The New York Times. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one's self to others: Reason-giving in a social context (pp. 41-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (2005). Playing the race card in the post-Willie Horton era: The impact of racialized code words on support for punitive crime policy . Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(1), 99-112.
18.
Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19-40.
19.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Jones, E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Judd, C.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619.
22.
Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 15 (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
23.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 223-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Kerry connects job loss and higher health costs, blames Bush. ( 2004, August 19). Associated Press State & Local Wire .
25.
Lau, R.R., & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 29-38.
26.
Leets, L. (2000). Attributional impact of linguistic masking devices . Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(3), 342-356.
27.
Lind, R.A., & Danowski, J.A. (1999). The representation of the home in U.S. electronic media: A computational linguistic analysis. In E. Min (Ed.), Reading the homeless: The media's image of homeless culture (pp. 109-120). Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
Marr, M., & Stiehler, H.-J. (1995). Zwei Fehler sind gemacht worden, und deshalb sind wir nicht mehr im Wettbewerb: Erklärungsmuster der Medien und des Publikums in der Kommentierung des Scheiterns der deutschen Nationalmannschaft bei der Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft 1994 [Two mistakes have been made, and that's why we're no longer in the competition: Explanation patterns of the media and the audience in comments on the failure of the German team in the soccer world championship 1994]. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 43(3), 330-349.
29.
McClure, J., Allen, M.W., & Walkey, F. (2001). Countering fatalism: Causal information in news reports affects judgments about earthquake damage. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), 109-121.
30.
Möller, J., & Brandt, H. (1994). Personale und situationale Leistung sbegründungen in Fernseh- und Zeitungsberichten [Individual and situational performance explanations in TV and newspaper reports]. Medienpsychologie , 6(4), 266-277.
31.
Morris, M.W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949-971.
32.
Nelson, T.E., Clawson, R.A., & Oxley, Z.M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effects on tolerance. American Political Science Review , 91(3), 567-582.
33.
Nelson, T.E., Oxley, Z.M., & Clawson, R.A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221-246.
34.
Nerb, J., & Spada, H., (2001). Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 521-551.
35.
Ng, S.H., & Bradac, J.J. (1993). Power in language. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G.M. (1996). Assessing news media influences on the formation of Whites' racial policy preferences. Communication Research , 23(2), 145-178.
37.
Preacher, K.J., & Leonardelli, G.J. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel Test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved May 2, 2007, from http://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm
38.
Rucinski, D. (1992). Personalized bias in news. Communication Research, 19(1), 91-108.
39.
Russell, D. (1982). The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 42(6), 1137-1145.
40.
Semetko, H.A., & Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.
41.
Shaver, K.G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer.
42.
Shields, T.G., & Goidel, R.K. (1998). Taking credit and avoiding blame: Good news, spin control, and democratic accountability. Political Communication , 15, 99-116.
43.
Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A., & Tetlock, P.E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Sotirovic, M. (2003). How individuals explain social problems: The influences of media use. Journal of Communication, 53, 122-137.
45.
Stiehler, H.-J., & Marr, M. (1996). Totgesagte leben länger: Erklärungsmuster der Medien und des Publikums zum Abschneiden der PDS bei den Kommunal- und Europawahlen in Leipzig 1994 [The condemned live longer: Explanation patterns of the media and the audience regarding the performance of the PDS in the local and European election in Leipzig 1994]. In C. Holtz-Bacha & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), Wahlen und Wahlkampf in den Medien: Untersuchungen aus dem Wahljahr 1994 [Elections and campaigning in the media: Research from the election year 1994] (pp. 119-149). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
46.
Strange, J.J., & Leung, C.C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 436-449.
47.
Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., & White, I.K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review , 96(1), 75-90.
48.
Valkenburg, P.M., Semetko, H.A., & de Vreese, C.H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communications Research, 26, 550-569.
49.
Vallerand, R.J., & Richer, F. (1988). On the use of the causal dimension scale in a field setting: A test with confirmatory factor analysis in success and failure situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 704-712.
50.
Weimann, G., & Fishman, G. (1988). Attribution of responsibility: Sex-based bias in press reports on crime. European Journal of Communication , 3, 415-430.
51.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.
52.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion . New York: Springer.
53.
Who's to blame? OPEC nations, American profligacy and politicians' posturing all contribute to high gas prices. (2006, April 26). Houston Chronicle, p. 8.
54.
Zillmann, D., Chen, L., Knobloch, S., & Callison, C. (2004). Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to Internet news reports. Communication Research, 31(1), 58-81.
