This article examines the process of collaborative information seeking in intercultural computer-mediated communication (CMC) groups. The authors conducted a field experiment in which 86 students from three distant universities (one in the United States, two in Singapore) participated. The students participated in a collaborative learning practice in which they socially recommended information using a CMC system. The results demonstrate that the social context—that is, preexisting social networks, groups, and intergroup boundaries—significantly constrained the flow of information across intercultural CMC groups. The authors also found that the influence of the social context on CMC collaboration could be moderated by other contingent factors such as national culture and individuals' outcome expectancies of Internet use. The authors present the results from testing their hypotheses using multivariate p* and Quadratic Assignment Procedure network regression analyses and conclude with a discussion of the findings and implications for future research.
Anderson, C.J., Wasserman, S., & Crouch, B. (1999). A p* primer: Logit models for social networks . Social Networks, 21, 37-66.
2.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4.
Banks, S., & Riley, P. (1993). Structuration theory as an ontology for communication research. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 17 (pp. 167-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Barley, S.R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 61-103.
6.
Berends, H., Boersma, K., &.Weggeman, M. (2003). The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations, 56(9), 1035-1056.
7.
Bikson, T., Eveland, J.D., & Gutek, B.A. (1989). Flexible interactive technologies for multi-person tasks: Current problems and future prospects. In M. H. Olson (Ed.), Technological support for work group collaboration (pp. 89-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Bond, M.H., & Hwang, K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-266). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
9.
Borgatti, S., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
10.
Brandon, D.P., & Hollingshead, A.B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6), 633-644.
11.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Calhoun, K.J., Teng, J.T.C., & Cheon, M.J. (2002). Impact of national culture on information technology usage behavior: An exploratory study of decision making in Korea and the USA . Behavior & Information Technology, 21(4), 293-302.
13.
Charney, T., & Greenberg, B. (2001). Uses and gratifications of the Internet. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication, technology and society: New media adoption and uses (pp. 379-407). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
14.
Chee, W.C., Harrison, G.L., McKinnon, J.L., & Wu, A. (1999). Cultural influences on informal information sharing in Chinese and Anglo-American organizations: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(7), 561-582.
15.
Cho, H., Lee, J., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2005). Development of computer-supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(6), 435-448.
16.
Chow, C.W., Deng, F.J., & Ho, J.L. (2000). The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations: A comparative study of the United States and the People's Republic of China . Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 65-96.
17.
Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly , 23(2), 145-158.
18.
Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: On the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science , 7(2), 119-135.
19.
Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 3(2), 100-120.
20.
DeSanctis, G. (1993). Shifting foundations in group support systems research. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 97-111). New York: Macmillan .
21.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M.S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advance technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
22.
De Vries, R.E., Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115-135.
23.
Eastin, M.A., & LaRose, R.L. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved November 29, 2000, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
24.
Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W.A. (2000). Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 59-83.
25.
Espinosa, J.A., DeLone, W., & Lee, G. (2006). Global boundaries, task processes, and IS project success: A field study. Information Technology and People , 19(4), 345-370.
26.
Evans, J., & Brooks, L. (2005). Understanding collaboration using new technologies: A structural perspective. The Information Society, 20, 215-220.
27.
Flanagin, A.J. (2000). Social pressures on organizational website adoption . Human Communication Research, 26, 618-646.
28.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology . Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921-950.
29.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C.W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (1999). The dark side of social capital. In R. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 298-322). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
31.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32.
Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
33.
Hammer, M. (1979/1980). Predictability of social connections over time. Social Networks, 2, 165-180.
34.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind . London: McGraw-Hill International .
36.
Hollingshead, A.B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
37.
Hollingshead, A.B. (2000). Perceptions of expertise in and transactive memory in work relationships. Group Processes Intergroup Relations , 3, 257-267.
38.
Hsu, M.H., Ju, T., Yen, C.H., & Chang, C.M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in a virtual community: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 153-169.
39.
Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 60-73.
40.
Katz, R., & Allen, T.J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7-19.
41.
Kraut, R.E., Rice, R.E., Cool, C., & Fish, R.S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9(4), 437-453.
42.
LaRose, R., Mastro, D.A., & Eastin, M.S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 395-413.
43.
Lau, D., & Murnighan, J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325-340.
44.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation and group decision-making [Special issue: Computer supported cooperative work and groupware]. International Journal of Man Machine Studies , 34, 283-301.
45.
Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K.M., & Wynn, E. (2006). How does virtuality affect team performance in a global organization? Understanding the impact of variety of practices. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9(1), 4-23.
46.
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWorks and their activity in intensional networks . Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205-242.
50.
O'Reilly, C. (1982). Variations in decision maker's use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756-771.
51.
Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-417.
52.
Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249-273.
53.
Palazzolo, E.T. (2005). Organizing for information retrieval in transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 32, 726-761.
54.
Pattison, P.E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks, II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 169-194.
55.
Pearce, W.G. (1976). The coordinated management of meeting: A rules-based theory of interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 17-35). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Peters, L.D. (2006). Conceptualizing computer-mediated communication technology and its use in organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 26(2), 142-152.
57.
Polzer, J.T., Crisp, C.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Kim, J.W. (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 679-692.
58.
Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
Poole, M.S., Seibold, D.R., & McPhee, R.D. (1985). Group decision making as a structuration process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71(February), 74-101.
60.
Ramirez, A., Walther, J., Burgoon, J.K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information seeking strategy, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model . Human Communication Research, 28(2), 213-228.
61.
Redding, S.G., & Wong, G.Y.Y. (1986). The psychology of Chinese organisational behaviour . In M. Bond (Ed.), Psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-266). Hong Kong, China: Oxford University Press.
62.
Reddy, M., & Dourish, P. (2002). A finger on the pulse: Temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. Unpublished proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 16-20, New Orleans, LA, pp. 343-353.
63.
Rice, R., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 219-244.
64.
Richards, W.D., & Seary, A.J. (2005). MultiNet for Windows (Version 4.74). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University .
65.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly , 23, 224-253.
66.
Schein, E.H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi , S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
Smith, M. (2002). Tools for navigating large social cyberspaces . Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 51-55.
69.
Smith, P.B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231-264.
70.
Sonnenwald, D.H., & Pierce, L.G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing and Management , 36(3), 461-447.
71.
Stafford, T.F., Stafford, M.R., & Schkade, L.L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet . Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259-288.
72.
Strauss, D., & Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudo-likelihood estimation for social networks . Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 204-212.
73.
Tan, B., Wei, K., Watson, R.T., Clapper, D.L., & Mclean, E.R. (1998). Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44(9), 1263-1279.
74.
Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R., & Daft, R.L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organization: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
75.
Triandis, H.C. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 41-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76.
Triandis, H.C. (2003). Forty-five years of researching the culture and behavior link: An intellectual autobiography. In D. Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Cross-cultural management: Foundations and future (pp. 11-28). Aldershot , UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate .
77.
Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. London: Basil-Blackwell .
78.
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
79.
Walther, J.B., Slovacek, C., & Tidwell, L.C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105-134.
80.
Wasko, M.M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-58.
81.
Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P.E. (1996). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks, I. An introduction to Markov random graphs and p. Psychometrika, 60, 401-425.
82.
Watson, R.T., Ho, T.H., & Raman, K.S. (1994). Culture: A fourth dimension of group support systems . Communications of the ACM, 37(10), 44-55.
83.
Watson-Manheim, M.B., Chudoba, K., & Crowston, K. (2002). Discontinuities and continuities: A new way to understand virtual work. Information, Technology & People , 15(3), 191-209.
84.
Wegner, D.M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In M. B. & G. G. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205). New York: Springer-Verlag.
85.
Wegner, D.M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923-929.
86.
Wellman, B., Hass, A.Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436-455.
87.
Yuan, Y.C., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2007). Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 34, 131-155.
88.
Zack, M.H., & McKenney, J.L. (1998). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. In G. DeSanctis & J. Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organizational form: Communication, connection, and community (pp. 247-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
