This study investigates the appeal of sensationalist television news. News stories were content analyzed to measure the presence of sensationalist features. In addition, the stories were watched and evaluated by participants to measure the degree to which the items elicited emotional arousal and the degree to which the items were liked. As predicted, the findings showed that emotional arousal mediates effects of sensationalist features on liking and that the relationship between emotional arousal and liking takes the shape of an inverted U.
Adams, W.C. (1978). Local public affairs content on TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 690-695.
2.
Bellamy, R.V., & Walker, J.R. (1996). Television and remote control: Grazing on a vast wasteland. New York: Guilford Press .
3.
Berlyne, D. (1971). Psychobiology and aesthetics. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
Bird, E.S. (2000). Audience demands in a murderous market: Tabloidization in U.S. television news. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 213-228). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
6.
Costera Meijer, I. (2007). The paradox of popularity. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 96-116.
7.
Davis, H., & McLeod, S.L. (2003). Why humans value sensational news. An evolutionary perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior , 24, 208-216.
8.
Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., & Duncan, J. (1980). An activation model of information exposure. Communication Monographs, 47, 295-303.
9.
Donohew, L., Pugzles Lorch, E., & Palmgreen, P. (1998). Applications of a theoretical model of information exposure to health interventions. Human Communication Research , 24, 454-468.
10.
Grabe, M.E., Lang, A., & Zhao, X. (2003). News content and form. Implications for memory and audience evaluations. Communication Research, 30, 387-413.
11.
Grabe, M.E., Zhou, S., & Barnett, B. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 635-655.
12.
Grabe, M.E., Zhou, S., Lang, A., & Bolls, P.D. (2000). Packaging television news: The effects of tabloid on information processing and evaluative responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 581-598.
13.
Harrington, N.G., Lane, D.R., Donohew, L., & Zimmerman, R.S. (2006). An extension of the activation model of information exposure: The addition of a cognitive variable to a model of attention. Media Psychology, 8, 139-164.
14.
Hayes, A.F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
15.
Hendriks Vettehen, P.G.J., Nuijten, C.M., & Beentjes, J.W.J. (2005). News in an age of competition: Sensationalism in Dutch television news 1995-2001. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 282-295.
16.
Hjarvard, S. (2000). Proximity. The name of the ratings game. Nordicom Review, 21(2), 63-81.
17.
Holbert, R.L., & Stephenson, M.T. (2003). The importance of indirect effects in media effects research: Testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 556-572.
18.
Hopkins, R., & Fletcher, J.E. (1994). Electrodermal measurement: Particularly effective for forecasting message influence on sales appeal. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 113-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Hvitfelt, H. (1994). The commercialization of the evening news: Changes in narrative technique in Swedish TV news. Nordicom Review , 15(1), 33-41.
20.
Jagodzinski, W., & Weede, E. (1981). Testing curvilinear propositions by polynomial regression with particular reference to the interpretation of standardized solutions. Quality & Quantity, 15, 447-463.
21.
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46-70.
22.
Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages . Journal of Communication, 56, S57-S80.
23.
Lang, A., Bolls, P.D., Potter, R., & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 451-457.
24.
Lang, A., Shin, M., Bradley, S.D., Wang, Z., Lee, S., & Potter, D. (2005). Wait! Don't turn that dial! More excitement to come! The effects of story length and production pacing in local television news on channel changing behavior and information processing in a free choice environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media , 49, 3-22.
25.
Lang, A., Shin, M., & Lee, S. (2005). Sensation seeking, motivation, and substance use: A dual system approach. Media Psychology, 7, 1-29.
26.
Leshner, G., Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1998). Switching channels: The effects of television channels on the mental representations of television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 21-33.
27.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods , 7, 83-104.
28.
McManus, J. (1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Morgan, S.E., Palmgreen, P., Stephenson, M.T., Hoyle, R.H., & Lorch, E.P. (2003). Associations between message features and subjective evaluations of the sensation value of antidrug public service announcements . Journal of Communication, 53, 512-526.
30.
Nabi, R.L., & Krcmar, M. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media research. Communication Theory, 14(4), 288-310.
31.
Palmgreen, P., Stephenson, M.T., Everett, M.W., Baseheart, J.R., & Francies, R. (2002). Perceived message sensation value (PMSV) and the validation of a PMSV scale. Health Communication, 14, 403-428.
32.
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L.A., & Rayburn, J.D., II. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: A study of television news. Communication Research, 7, 161-192.
33.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York : Springer.
34.
Potter, R.F., & Choi, J. (2006). The effects of auditory structural complexity on attitudes, attention, and memory. Media Psychology, 8, 395-419.
35.
Potter, R.F., & Dillman Carpentier, F.R. (2005, May). Effects of music on physiological arousal: Explorations into genre and tempo. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York City, NY.
Rubin, A.M., Perse, E.M., & Powell, R.A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180.
38.
Scott, D., & Gobetz, R.H. (1992). Hard news/soft news content of the national broadcast networks, 1972-1987. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 406-412.
39.
Shoemaker, P.J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32-47.
40.
Slattery, K.L., Doremus, M., & Marcus, L. (2001). Shifts in public affairs reporting on the network evening news: A move toward the sensational. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 290-302.
41.
Slattery, K.L., & Hakanen, E.A. (1994). Sensationalism versus public affairs content of local TV news: Pennsylvania revisited. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 205-216.
42.
Southwell, B. (2005). Between messages and people. A multilevel model of memory for television content. Communication Research, 32, 112-140.
43.
Southwell, B., & Lee, M. (2004). A pitfall of new media? User controls exacerbate editing effects on memory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 643-656.
44.
Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Fundamentals of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
45.
Zillmann, D. (1982). Television viewing and arousal. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet , & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health & Human Behavior, National Institute of Mental Health.
46.
Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and sociobiological bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
