College students and single noncollege adults defined the term date, differentiated dates from going out with a friend, and described their reasons for going on their most recent first date. Responses indicate that single adults vary more in their orientation toward dating (e.g., an emphasis on a lifelong relationship) than do college students. Sex differences in first date goals appeared only in the college sample. College men were more likely to report sexual goals, whereas college women were more likely to report goals reflecting friendship, date-to-date, and having fun. Results highlight the importance of several forms of uncertainty reduction, shed light on an application of predicted outcome value theory, and suggest that the nature of commitment may differ across age groups.
Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194.
2.
Bailey, B.L. (1988). From front porch to back seat: Courtship in twentieth century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Baxter, L.A., & Bullis, C. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships . Human Communication Research, 12, 469-493.
4.
Berger, C.R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Berger, C.R. (2002). Goals and knowledge structures in social interaction . In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp.181-212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Berger, C.R., & Calabrese, R.J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication . Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
7.
Buss, D.M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (Rev. ed.). New York: Basic Books .
8.
Cate, R.M., Koval, J., Lloyd, S.A., & Wilson, G. (1995). Assessment of relationship thinking in dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 2, 77-95.
Clark, C.L., Shaver, P.R., & Abrahams, M.F. (1999). Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 707-720.
11.
Cooney, T., & Dunne, K. (2001). Intimate relationships in later life. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 838-858.
12.
Coupland, J. (2000). Past the “perfect kind of age”? Styling selves and relationships in over-50s dating advertisements. Journal of Communication, 50(3), 9-30.
13.
Deyo, Y., & Deyo, S. (2002). Speed dating: The smarter, faster way to lasting love. New York: HarperCollins.
14.
Dillard, J.P. (1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence . In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch-Scarisbrick.
15.
Eagly, A.H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist , 54, 408-423.
16.
Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
17.
Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: Institute for American Values.
18.
Harris, M.J. (1993). Issues in studying the mediation of expectancy effects: Taxonomy of expectancy effects. In P. D. Blanck (Ed.), Interpersonal expectancies: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 350-378). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Jacobsen, J.L. (2003, February). “Secret tests” in the dating behavior of older adults. Paper presented to the Western States Communication Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
20.
King, V., & Scott, M.E. (2005). A comparison of cohabiting relationships among older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 271-285.
21.
Kunkel, A.D., Wilson, S.R., Olufowote, J., & Robson, S. (2003). Identity implications of influence goals: Initiating, intensifying, and ending romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 382-412.
22.
Laner, M.R., & Ventrone, N.A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited . Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488-500.
23.
Levesque, L.M., & Caron, S.L. (2004). Dating preferences of women born between 1945 and 1960. Journal of Family Issues, 25(6), 833-846.
24.
McCabe, M.P., & Collins, J.K. (1979). Sex roles and dating orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 8, 407-425.
25.
Mongeau, P.A., Carey, C.M., & Williams, M.L.M. (1998). First date initiation and enactment: An expectancy violation perspective. In D. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities: A handbook. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Mongeau, P.A., & Kendall, J.A. (1996, June). “What do you mean this is a date?”: Differentiating a date from going out with friends. Paper presented to the International Network on Personal Relationships, Seattle, WA.
27.
Mongeau, P.A., Serewicz, M.C.M., Henningsen, M.L.M., & Davis, K.L. (2006). Sex differences in the transition to a heterosexual romantic relationship. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (2nd ed., pp.337-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Mongeau, P.A., Serewicz, M.C., & Therrien, L. (2004). Goals for cross-sex first dates: Identification, measurement, and contextual factors. Communication Monographs , 71, 121-147.
29.
Mongeau, P.A., & Teubner, G. (2002). Romantic relationship transitions. Paper presented to the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
30.
Montenegro, X.P. (2003). Lifestyles, dating, and romance: A study of midlife singles. Washington, DC: AARP.
31.
Morr, M.C., & Mongeau, P.A. (2004). First date expectations: The impact of sex of initiator, alcohol consumption, and relationship type. Communication Research, 31, 3-35.
32.
Muehlenhard, C.L., & Linton, M.A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 34, 186-196.
33.
Oliver, M.B., & Hyde, J.S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin,114, 29-51.
34.
Roscoe, B., Diana, M.S., & Brooks, R.H. (1987). Early, middle, and late adolescents' views on dating and factors influencing partner selection. Adolescence , 85, 59-68.
35.
Rose, S., & Frieze, I.H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating. Sex Roles,28, 499-509.
36.
Rusbult, C.E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45, 101-117
37.
Sears, D.O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
38.
Solomon, D.H., & Knobloch, L.K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795-816.
39.
Sternberg, R.J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review,93, 119-135.
40.
Sunnafrank, M. (1986). Predicted outcome value during initial interactions: A reformulation of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 13, 3-33.
41.
Theiss, J.A., & Solomon, D.H. (2006). A relational turbulence model of communication about irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 33, 391-418.
42.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Household relationship and family status of children under 18 years, by age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, and metropolitan residence: March 1999. Retrieved August 15, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/p20-537/1999/tabC1.pdf
43.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2004, September 15). Estimated median age at first marriage by sex: 1890—present . Retrieved September 29, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/tabMS-2.pdf
44.
Vohs, K.D., Catanese, K.R., & Baumeister, R.F. (2004). Sex in “his” versus “her” relationships. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 433-474). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Wilson, G.D., Cousins, J.M., & Fink, B. (2006). The CQ as a predictor of speed-date outcomes. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 163, 169.
