Print news stories about genetics convey information to the public. This study assesses the effects of priming a belief in genetic susceptibility to smoking addiction on smokers’ inferences about their own susceptibility to smoking addiction, their efficacy to quit smoking, and their intention to get a genetic test for addiction susceptibility. Respondents were 450 young adult smokers surveyed on the telephone in a randomized experiment embedded in a questionnaire about cigarette smoking practices. In the priming condition, respondents heard a news story about genes for smoking addiction. In the unprimed condition, respondents heard a news story concerning the gender of the offspring of smokers. Priming with the genetics news story did not affect respondents’ inferences about personal genetic susceptibility to smoking addiction. However, those finding the news story believable and having a strong family history of smoking were more likely to infer a greater personal genetic susceptibility.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
2.
Albarracin, D. (2002). Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 61-130). New York: Academic Press.
3.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2004). Standard definitions: Final disposition of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (3rd ed.). Lenexa, KS: Author.
4.
Baranowski, T., Cullen, K. W., Basen-Engquist, K., Wetter, D. W., Cummings, S., Martineau, D. S., et al. (1997). Transitions out of high school: Time of increased cancer risk?Preventive Medicine, 26, 694-703.
5.
Codori, A., Petersen, G. M., Miglioretti, D. L., Larkin, E. K., Bushey, M. T., Young, C., et al. (1999). Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: Factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 8, 345-351.
6.
Condit, C. M. (1999). The meanings of the gene. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Condit, C. M., Ferguson, A., Kassel, R., Thadhani, C., Gooding, H. C., & Parrott, R. (2001). An exploratory study of the impact of news headlines on genetic determinism. Science Communication, 22, 379-395.
8.
Condit, C. M., Ofulue, N., & Sheedy, K. M. (1998). Determinism and mass-media portrayals of genetics. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 979-984.
9.
Craig, D. A. (2000). Ethical language and themes in news coverage of genetic testing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 7, 160-174.
10.
Devos-Comby, L., & Salovey, P. (2002). Applying persuasion strategies to alter HIV-relevant thoughts and behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6, 287-304.
11.
de Vries, H., Dijkstra, M., & Kuhlman, P. (1988). Self-efficacy: The third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Education Research, 3, 273-282.
12.
Domke, D. (2001). Racial cues and political ideology. Communication Research, 28, 772-801.
13.
Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 51-75.
14.
Fan, D., & Halloway, W. (1994). Media coverage and cocaine and its impact of usage patterns. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 139-161.
15.
French, D. P., Marteau, T. M., Senior, V., & Weinman, J. (2000). Perceptionsof multiple risk factors for heart attacks. Psychological Reports, 87, 222-235.
16.
Gilovich, T. (1981). Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 797-808.
17.
Godin, G., Valois, P., Lepage, L., & Desharnais, R. (1992). Predictors of smoking behaviour: An application of Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 1335-1343.
18.
Hall, W., Madden, P., & Lynskey, M. (2002). The genetics of tobacco use: Methods, findings and policy implications. Tobacco Control, 11, 119-124.
19.
Hanson, M. J. (1997). The theory of planned behavior applied to cigarette smoking in African American, Puerto Rican, and Non-Hispanic white teenage females. Nursing Research, 46(3), 155-162.
20.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Klein, C. T. F., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2002). Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Health, 17, 437-446.
22.
Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizam, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
23.
Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (2004). The importance of resistance to persuasion. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 3-9). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
The Lancet Oncology. (2004). Communicating risk: An impossible task?The Lancet Oncology, 4, 519-519.
25.
Lanie, A. D., Jayaratne, T. E., Sheldon, J. P., Kardia, S. L. R., Anderson, E. S., Feldbaum, M., et al. (2004). Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 305-320.
26.
Lantz, P. M. (2002, July). Smoking on the rise among young adults: Implications for research and policy. Unpublished paper presented at “Innovations in Youth Tobacco Control,” Santa Fe, NM.
27.
Lerman, C., & Berrettini, W. (2003). Elucidating the role of genetic factors in cigarette smoking. American Journal of Medical Genetics (NeuroPsychiatric Genetics), 118B, 48-54.
28.
Lerman, C., Gold, K., Audrain, J., Lin, T. H., Boyd, N. R., Orlenas, C. T., et al. (1997). Incorporating biomarkers of exposure and genetic susceptibility into smoking cessation treatments: Effects on smoking related cognitions, emotions, and behavior change. Health Psychology, 16, 87-99.
29.
Lerman, C., Hughes, C., Trock, B. J., Myers, R. E., Main, D., Bonney, A., et al. (1999). Genetic testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1618-1622.
30.
Lerman, C., & Niaura, R. (2002).. Applying genetic approaches to the treatment of nicotine dependence. Oncogene, 21, 7412-7420.
31.
Lerman, C., Schulman, K., Narod, S., & Lynch, H. (1996). Genetic testing of families with hereditary diseases. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1138-1139.
32.
Leventhal, H., Benyamini, Y., Brownlee, S., Diefenbach, M., Leventhal, E. A., Patrick-Miller, L., et al. (1997). Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In K. J. Petrie & J. A. Weinman (Eds.), Perceptions of health and illness (pp. 19-45). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Academic.
33.
Leventhal, H., & Diefenbach, M. (1991). The active side of illness cognition. In J. A. Skelton & R. T. Croyle (Eds.), Mental representation in health and illness (pp. 247-272). New York: Springer-Verlag.
34.
Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
35.
Marteau, T. M., & Lerman, C. (2001). Genetic risk and behavioural change. British Medical Journal, 322, 1056-1059.
36.
Morley, D. D., & Walker, K. B. (1987). The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change. Communication Monographs, 54, 436-442.
37.
Munafo, M., Johnstone, E., Murphy, M., & Walton, R. (2001). New directions in the genetic mechanisms underlying nicotine addiction. Addiction Biology, 6, 109-117.
38.
Nelkin, D., & Lindee, S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as cultural icon. New York: Freeman.
39.
O’Callaghan, F. V., Callan, V. J., & Baglioni, A. (1999). Cigarette use by adolescents: Attitude–behavior relationships. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 455-468.
40.
Parrott, R. L., Silk, K. J., & Condit, C. (2003). Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: Genes, environments, and personal behaviors. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1099-1109.
41.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
42.
Plomin, R., & Crabbe, J. (2000). DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 806-828.
43.
Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News value and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
44.
Prokhorov, A. V., Warneke, C., de Moor, C., Emmons, K. M., Mullin, J. M., Rosenblum, C., et al. (2003). Self-reported health status, health vulnerability, and smoking behavior in college students: Implications for intervention. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5, 545-552.
45.
Saab, P. G., McCalla, J. R., Christensen, A. J., Johnson, S. B., Stepanski, E., Coons, H. L., et al. (2004). Technological and medical advances: Implications for health psychology. Health Psychology, 23, 142-146
46.
Sagarin, B. J., Cialdini, R. B., Rice, W. E., & Serna, S. B. (2002). Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 526-541.
47.
Singer, E., Corning, A., & Lamias, M. (1998). The polls—Trends: Genetic testing, engineering, and therapy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 633-664.
48.
Struewing, J. P., Lerman, C., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., & Tucker, M. A. (1995). Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Cancer Epidemiology & Biomarkers Prevention, 4, 169-173.
49.
Sutton, S. R., & Eiser, J. R. (1984). The effect of fear-arousing communications on cigarette smoking: An expectancy-value approach. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 7, 13-33.
50.
Tambor, E. S., Bernhardt, B. A., Rodgers, J., Holtzman, N. A., & Geller, G. (2002). Mapping the human genome: An assessment of media coverage and public reaction. Genetics in Medicine, 4, 31-36.
51.
Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
52.
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75-90.
53.
Valentino, N. A., Traugott, M. W., & Hutchings, V. L. (2002). Group cues and ideological constraint: A replication of political advertising effects studies in the lab and in the field. Political Communication, 19, 29-48.
54.
Velicer, W. F., DiClemente, C. C., Rossi, J. S., & Prochaska, J. O. (1990). Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addictive behaviors, 15, 271-283.
55.
Wegnerer, D. T., Petty, R. E., Smoak, N. D., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2004). Multiple routes top resisting attitude change. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp.13-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Weinstein, N. (1998). Accuracy of smokers’ risk perceptions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 135-140.
57.
Woods, M. N., Harris, K. J., Mayo, M. S., Catley, D., Scheibmeir, M., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2002). Participation of African Americans in a smoking cessation trial: A quantitative and qualitative study. Journal of the National Medical Association, 94, 609-618.
58.
Wright, A. J., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. M. (2003). The impact of learning of a genetic predisposition to nicotine dependence: An analogue study. Tobacco Control, 12, 227-231.
59.
Yanovitsky, I., & Stryker, J. (2001). A norm transformation approach to mass media and public health: A longitudinal study of media effects on youth binge drinking. Communication Research, 28, 208-239.
60.
Ybarra, O., & Trafimow, D. (1998). How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 362-370.
61.
Yi, Y. (1990a). Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 19, 40-48.
62.
Yi, Y. (1990b). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 215-222.
63.
Zillman, D., & Brosius, H. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
