The present study addresses the role of the media in the self-categorization-based process of depersonalized attraction. Results provide tentative support for the proposition that prototype embodiment impacts subsequent judgments of celebrity social attractiveness. Specifically, social attraction was most effectively predicted by ingroup prototype embodiment along the dimension of intelligence addressed in the induction, influencing liking of both ingroup (White) and outgroup (Black) target celebrities.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1990). An introduction to the social identity approach. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 1-9). Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
2.
Anderson, C. (1997). Effects of violent movies and trait hostility on hostile feelings and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 161-178.
3.
Aune, R., & Kikuchi, T. (1993). Effects of language intensity similarity on perceptions of credibility, relational attributions, and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 224-238.
4.
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
5.
Bodenhausen, G., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Wanke, M. (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 48-63.
6.
Brewer, M., & Campbell, D. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York: Halsted.
7.
Brewer, M., & Harasty, A. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. Sorrentino & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford.
8.
Brewer, M., Manzi, J., & Shaw, J. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88-92.
9.
Brewer, M., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Brown, R., & Turner, J. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behavior. In J. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Coover, G. (2001). Television and social identity: Race representation as “White” accommodation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 413-431.
12.
Devine, P. G. (1995). Prejudice and out-group perception. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 467-524). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Domke, D., McCoy, K., & Torres, M. (1999). News media, racial perceptions, and political cognition. Communication Research, 26, 570-607.
14.
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
15.
Espinoza, J., & Garza, R. (1985). Social group salience and interethnic cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 380-392.
16.
Ferguson, C., & Kelley, H. (1964). Significant factors in overevaluation of own group’s product. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 69, 223-228.
17.
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego: Academic Press.
18.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
19.
Hansen, C., & Hansen, R. (1988). How rock music videos can change what is seen when boy meets girl: Priming stereotypic appraisal of social interaction. Sex Roles, 19, 287-316.
20.
Hogg, M. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.
21.
Hogg, M. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (pp. 227-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp.28-47). Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
Hogg, M., Cooper-Shaw, L., & Holzworth, D. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 452-465.
24.
Hogg, M., & Hains, C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
25.
Hogg, M., & Hardie, E. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180.
26.
Hogg, M., & Hardie, E. (1992). Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A self-categorization analysis of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 41-56.
27.
Hogg, M., & McGarty, C. (1990). Self-categorization and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 10-27). Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
28.
Hogg, M., & Terry, D. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organization contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
29.
Hogg, M., Terry, D., & White, K. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255-269.
30.
Hogg, M., & Williams, K. (2000). From I to We: Social identity and the collective self. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 81-97.
31.
Johnson, J., Adams, M., Hall, W., & Ashburn, L. (1997). Race, media and violence: Differential racial effects of exposure to violent news stories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 81-90.
32.
Jones, E., Gallois, C., Barker, M., & Callan, V. J. (1994). Evaluations of interactions between students and academic staff: Influence of communication accommodation, ethnic group, and status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 158-191.
33.
Le Poire, B., Ota, H., & Hajek, C. (1997). Self-disclosure responses to stigmatizing disclosures: Communicating with gays and potentially HIV+ individuals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 159-190.
34.
Maio, G., & Olson, J. (2000). What is a “value-expressive” attitude? In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.) Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 249-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Peffley, M., Shields, T., & Williams, B. (1996). The intersection of race and crime in television news stories: An experimental study. Political Communication, 13, 309-327.
36.
Pettigrew, T. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
37.
Petty, R., & Wegener, D. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137-165.
38.
Power, J., Murphy, S., & Coover, G. (1996). Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counter-stereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among in-groups and out-groups. Human Communication Research, 23, 36-58.
39.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Dillman-Carpentier, F. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 97-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Rothbart, M., & John, O. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104.
41.
Ryan, C., & Bogart, L. (1997). Development of new group members’ in-group and out-group stereotypes: Changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 719-732.
42.
Santos, S., Garza, R., & Bohon, L. (1994). Status differentials, status stability and interethnic social competition in Anglo Americans and Mexican Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16, 438-458.
43.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. (1961). Social judgement: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.
45.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
46.
Turner, J. (1985). Social categorization and the self concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
47.
Turner, J. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
48.
Valentino, N. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the President. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
49.
Weber, R., & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.
50.
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5-15.
52.
Wilder, D. (1984). Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 177-194.
