This study sought to test the underlying assumption of the face-negotiation theory that face is an explanatory mechanism for culture’s influence on conflict behavior. A questionnaire was administered to 768 participants in 4 national cultures (China, Germany, Japan, and the United States) asking them to describe interpersonal conflict. The major findings of this study are as follows: (a) cultural individualism-collectivism had direct and indirect effects on conflict styles, (b) independent self-construal related positively with self-face and interdependent self-construal related positively with other-face, (c) self-face related positively with dominating conflict styles and other-face related positively with avoiding and integrating styles, and (d) face accounted for all of the total variance explained (100% of 19% total explained) in dominating, most of the total variance explained in integrating (70% of 20% total explained), and some of the total variance explained in avoiding (38% of 21% total explained) when considering face concerns, cultural individualismcollectivism, and self-construals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS users’ guide version 3.6. Chicago: SmallWaters.
2.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
3.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Cai, D. A.,& Fink, E. L. (2002). Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69, 67-87.
5.
Cocroft, B. K., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Facework in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 469-506.
6.
Cupach, W. R., & Canary, D. J. (Eds.). (1997). Competence in interpersonal conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Elsayed-Ekhouly, S. M.,& Buda, R. (1996). Organizational conflict: Acomparative analysis of conflict style across cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 71-81.
8.
Gabrielidis, C., Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Dos Santos Pearson, V. M., & Villareal, L. (1997). Preferred styles of conflict resolution: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 661-677.
9.
Gao, G. (1998). An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for “other” in Chinese interpersonal communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 467-482.
10.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231.
11.
Griffin, E. (2000). A first look at communication theory(4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K. S., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
13.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Hoyle, R. H.,& Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications(pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Hunter, J. E.,& Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267-320.
17.
Kim, M. S., Hunter, J. E., Miyahara, A., Horvath, A., Bresnahan, M., & Yoon, H. (1996). Individual- vs. cultural-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles. Communication Monographs, 63, 28-49.
18.
Kline, R. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equal modeling. New York: Guilford.
19.
Markus, H.,& Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
20.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age group. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
21.
Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Morisaki, S.,& Gudykunst, W. B. (1994). Face in Japan and the United States. In Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues(pp. 47-94). Albany: State University of New York.
23.
Oetzel, J. G. (1998). The effects of ethnicity and self-construals on selfreported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11, 133-144.
24.
Oetzel, J. G., Myers, K. K., Meares, M. M.,& Lara, E. (in press). Interpersonal conflict in organizations: Explaining conflict styles via face-negotiation theory. Communication Research Reports.
25.
Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Chew, M., Harris, R., Wilcox, R., & Stumpf, S. (2003). Face and facework in conflicts with parents and siblings: A crosscultural comparison of Germans, Japanese, Mexicans, and U.S. Americans. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 67-93.
26.
Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., & Wilcox, R. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs, 68, 235-258.
27.
Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., Yokochi, Y., Masumoto, T.,& Takai, J. (2000). A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers. Communication Quarterly, 48, 397-419.
28.
Ohbuchi, K., Fukushima, O., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Cultural values in conflict management: Goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactical decision. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 51-71.
29.
Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Putnam, L. L.,& Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication(pp. 549-599). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, C. (1982). Communication strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6(pp. 629-652). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 368-376.
34.
Rahim, M. A. (2001). Managing conflict in organizations(3rd ed.). Westport, CT: Quorum.
35.
Ruble, T. L.,& Thomas, K. W. (1976). Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 143-155.
36.
Singelis, T.,& Brown, W. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21, 354-389.
37.
Sternberg, R. J.,& Dobson, D. M.(1987). Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 794-812.
38.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict MODE instrument. Tuxedo, NY: Xicom.
39.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication(pp. 213-235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Managing intercultural conflicts effectively. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader(7th ed., pp. 360-372). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1997). Intercultural conflict competence. In W. Cupach & D. Canary (Eds.), Competence in interpersonal conflict(pp. 120-147). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
Ting-Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Kim, H. S., Lin, S.L., & Nishida, T. (1991). Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 275-296.
43.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187-225.
44.
Ting-Toomey, S.,& Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Managing intercultural conflict effectively. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Ting-Toomey, S., Yee-Jung, K., Shapiro, R., Garcia, W., Wright, T., & Oetzel, J. G. (2000). Cultural/ethnic identity salience and conflict styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 47-81.
46.
Tinsley, C. (1998). Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German, and American cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 316-322.
47.
Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder,CO: Westview.
48.
West, R., & Turner, L. (2000). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
49.
Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L. (2001). Interpersonal conflict(6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
