This article explores a possible association between skepticism toward the media and audience exposure patterns. Hypotheses predicting a relationship between media skepticism and news media consumption are tested on four large sample data sets. Findings show that media skepticism is negatively associated with mainstream news exposure but positively associated with nonmainstream news exposure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennet, S. E., Staci, L. R., & Flickinger, R. S. (2001). Assessing Americans' opinions about the news media's fairness in 1996 and 1998. Political Communication, 18, 163-182.
2.
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33(4), 563-576.
3.
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.
4.
Brosius, H., Wober, M., & Weimann, G. (1992). The loyalty of television viewing: How consistent is television viewing behavior? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36(3), 321-335.
5.
Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Carmines, E. G., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1991). Incentives, opportunities, and the logic of public opinion in American political representation. In J. A. Ferjohn & J. H. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 240-268). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
7.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
8.
Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302-320). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Domke, D., Watts, M. D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. (1999). The politics of conservative elites and the liberal media argument. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 35-58.
10.
Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger, L. (1984). Patrons, clients and friends: Interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Fenton, N. (2000). Critical perspectives on trust and civil society. In F. Tonkiss, A. Passey, N. Fenton, & L. Hems (Eds.), Trust and civil society (pp. 151-174). London: MacMillan.
12.
Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions with reason. New York: Norton.
13.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
14.
Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making or breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213-237). New York: Blackwell.
15.
Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
16.
Gaziano, C. (1988). How credible is the credibility crisis? Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 267-278.
17.
Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451-462.
18.
Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 165-180.
19.
Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Hitchon, J., Gorham, B. W., Kannaovakun, P., Gilligan, E., et al. (2001). Predicting selection and activity in television genre viewing. Media Psychology, 3(3), 237-264.
20.
Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (Vol. 10, pp. 315-359). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Hubbell, A. P., & Medved, C. E. (2001, June). Measuring trustworthy organizational behaviors: A review of the literature and scale validation. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
22.
Johnson, S. M., & Talitman, E. (1997). Predictors of success in emotionally focused marital therapy. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 23(2), 135-152.
23.
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing the Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-245.
24.
Kiousis, S. (2000, June). Boomerangs agenda setting: Presidential media coverage and public confidence in the press. Paper presented at the 50th Annual International Communication Association Conference, Acapulco, Mexico.
25.
Kohut, A., & Toth, R. C. (1998). The central conundrum: How can people like what they distrust. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(1), 110-117.
26.
Liebes, T. (2001). Inside a news item: A dispute over framing. Political Communication, 17, 295-305.
27.
Liebeskind, K. (1997). Credibility problems plague all media. Editor & Publishers, 130(50), 23.
28.
Lorenz, E. (1999). Trust, contract and economic cooperation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(3), 301-315.
29.
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567-588.
31.
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1986). Social patterns of distress. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 23-45.
32.
Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Orbell, J., & Dawes, R. M. (1991). A “cognitive miser” theory of cooperators' advantage. American Political Science Review, 85(2), 515-528.
34.
Paige, J. M. (1971). Political orientation and riot participation. American Sociological Review, 36(5), 810-820.
35.
Pask, E. J. (1995). Trust: An essential component of nursing practice—Implications for nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 15(3), 190-195.
36.
Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. S. (1996). The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), 361-376.
37.
Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(2), 133-164.
38.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
40.
Scholz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398-417.
41.
Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Research.
42.
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Tsfati, Y. (2001). Media skepticism and climate of opinion perception. Paper presented at the World Association of Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Rome, Italy.
44.
Vollone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perception of bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577-585.
45.
Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns. Communication Research, 26(2), 144-175.
46.
West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 159-168.
47.
Wheeless, L. R. (1974). The effects of attitude, credibility, and homophily on selective exposure to information. Speech Monographs, 41, 329-338.
48.
Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
