This experiment examines the effect of tabloid and standard packaging styles on calm and arousing news stories. The goal of this line of research is to investigate the combined influence of form and content on information processing and viewer evaluations of television news. Results indicate that the bells and whistles of tabloid production features enhance memory for calm news items but overburden the information processing system when applied to arousing news content. The evaluative measures produced data that show formal features have an influence on the meaning viewers derive from news content and that they rate news packaged in the tabloid format as less objective and believable than stories without these dramatic features.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, W. E., & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71(4), 973-983.
2.
Bernstein, C. (1992, June). The idiot culture: Reflections of post-Watergate journalism. The New Republic,p.22.
3.
Bird, S. E. (1992). For inquiring minds: A cultural study of supermarket tabloids. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
4.
Brosius, H. (1993). The effects of emotional pictures in television news. Communication Research, 20, 105-124.
5.
Edwardson, M., Kent, K., Engstrom, E., & Hofmann, R. (1992). Audio recall immediately following video change in television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 395-410.
6.
Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. Routledge: London.
7.
Grabe, M. E. (1996). The South African Broadcasting Corporation's coverage of the 1987 and 1989 elections: The matter of visual bias. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(1), 1-27.
8.
Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S., & Barnett, B. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4), 635-655.
9.
Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S., Lang, A., & Bolls, P. D. (2000). Packaging television news: The effects of tabloid on information processing and evaluative responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 581-598.
10.
Graber, D. A. (1994). The infotainment quotient in routine television news: A director's perspective. Discourse in Society, 5(4), 483-808.
11.
Gurevitch, M., & Levy, M. (1986). Information and meaning: Audience explanations of social issues. In J. Robinson & M. Levy (Eds.), The main source: Learning from television news (pp. 159-175). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Hofstetter, C. R., & Dozier, D. M. (1986). Useful news, sensational news: Quality, sensationalism and local TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 63(4), 815-820, 853.
13.
Hopkins, R., & Fletcher, J. E. (1994). Electrodermal measurement: Particularly effective for forecasting message influence on sales appeal. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 113-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Kepplinger, H. M. (1982). Visual biases in television campaign coverage. Communication Research, 9(3), 432-446.
15.
Kurtz, H. (1993, July 4). Murder! Mayhem! Ratings! Tabloid sensationalism is thriving on TV news. The Washington Post,p.A1.
16.
Lang, A. (1998). Effects of chronological presentation of information on processing and memory for broadcast news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33(4), 441-452.
17.
Lang, A. (1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and mild emotion in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17(3), 275-299.
18.
Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70.
19.
Lang, A., & Basil, M. (1998). Attention, resource allocation, and communication research: What do secondary task reaction times measure anyway? In M. Roloff (Ed.), Mass communication yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 443-474). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Lang, A., Bolls, P. D., Potter, R. F., & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 451-475.
21.
Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers' cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(3), 313-327.
22.
Lang, A., Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J. (1993). The effects of related and unrelated cuts on television viewers' attention, processing capacity, and memory. Communication Research, 20(1), 4-29.
23.
Lang, A., Newhagen, J., & Reeves, B. (1996). Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 460-477.
24.
Lang, A., Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (1999). Something for nothing: Is visual encoding automatic? Media Psychology, 1(2), 145-163.
25.
Lang, A., Zhou, S., Schwartz, N., Bolls, P. D., & Potter, R. F. (2000). The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 94-109.
26.
Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Evaluative, facial, visceral, and behavioral responses. Psychophysiology, 30, 261-273.
27.
Mendoza, M. (1995, October). Lehrer loses MacNeil, but show goes on. The Dallas Morning News,p.1C.
28.
Mundorf, N., Drew, D., Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. (1990). Effects of disturbing news on recall of subsequently presented news. Communication Research, 17(5), 601-615.
29.
Newhagen, J. E. (1998). TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach-avoidance and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2(2), 265-276.
30.
Newhagen, J. E., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66(2), 277-284.
31.
Newhagen, J. E., & Reeves, B. (1992). The evening's bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 25-42.
Shaw, D. L., & Slater, J. W. (1985). In the eye of the beholder? Sensationalism in American press news, 1820-1860. Journalism History, 12(3-4), 86-91.
34.
Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32-47.
35.
Slattery, K. L., & Hakanen, E. A. (1994). Sensationalism versus public affairs content of local TV news: Pennsylvania revisited. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(2), 205-216.
36.
Stevens, J. D. (1985). Social utility of sensational news: Murder and divorce in the 1920's. Journalism Quarterly, 62(1), 53-58.
37.
Tannenbaum, P. H., & Lynch, M. D. (1960). Sensationalism: The concept and its measurement. Journalism Quarterly, 37(2), 381-392.
38.
Thorson, E., & Lang, A. (1992). The effects of television videographics and lecture familiarity on adult cardiac orienting responses and memory. Communication Research, 19(3), 346-369.
39.
Zillmann, D. (1982). Television and arousal. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (pp. 53-67). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
