Two experiments focused on nonverbal mirroring in a group discussion. In Experiment 1, each participant interacted with two confederates. Confederates disagreed with each other and with the participant during discussion. One confederate mirrored the nonverbal behavior of the participant; the other did not. Participants rated the imitating confederate as more confident and persuasive. However, they were not more likely to change their viewpoint to match that of this confederate. Independent coders, unaware of the hypotheses, did not rate the two confederates as significantly different. In Experiment 2, each participant again interacted with two confederates. One confederate agreed with the participant during the discussion, and the other disagreed. One confederate rubbed his or her face during the discussion. The other shook his or her foot. The hypothesis that participants would be more likely to mirror the nonverbal behavior of the confederate who agreed with them during discussion received no support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2.
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1988). Form and function in motor mimicry: Topographic evidence that the primary function is communicative. Human Communication Research, 14, 275-299.
3.
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). “I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 322-329.
4.
Beebe, S. A., & Masterson, J. T. (2000). Communicating in small groups (6th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
5.
Burn, S. W. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 611-629.
6.
Charney, E. J. (1966). Postural configurations in psychotherapy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 28, 305-315.
7.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
8.
Chen, M., Chartrand, T. L., Lee Chai, A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Priming primates: Human and otherwise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 685-686.
9.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Crano, W. D. (1983). Assumed consensus of attitudes: The effect of vested interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 597-608.
11.
Dabbs, J. M., Jr. (1969). Similarity of gestures and interpersonal influence. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 337-338.
12.
Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 19, 643-647.
13.
Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 79-84.
14.
Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1969). Body movement and speech rhythm in social conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 98-106.
15.
Evans, F. B. (1963). Selling as a dyadic relationship: A new approach. American Behavioral Scientists, 6(7), 76-79.
16.
Fischer, D. (1989). Albion's seed: Four British folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Frenzen, J. R., & Davis, H. L. (1990). Purchasing behavior in embedded markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 1-12.
18.
Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility. New York: Appleton-Century.
19.
LaFrance, M. (1979). Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 66-70.
20.
LaFrance, M. (1982). Posture mirroring and rapport. In M. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 279-298). New York: Human Sciences Press.
21.
LaFrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group and Organization Studies, 1, 328-333.
22.
Lipps, T. (1907). Psychologische untersuchungen. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.
23.
McGrath, A. E. (1993). Reformation thought. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
24.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977, October 7). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75-78.
25.
Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702-709.
26.
Murray, D. A., Leupker, R. V., Johnson, C. A., & Mittlemark, M. B. (1984). The prevention of cigarette smoking in children: A comparison of four strategies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 274-288.
27.
Navarre, D., & Emihovich, C. A. (1978, April). Movement synchrony and the self-analytic group. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Boston.
28.
Sanchez-Burks, J. (2002). Protestant relational ideology and (in)attention to relational cues in work settings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 919-929.
29.
Sanchez-Burks, J., Lee, F., Choi, I., Nisbett, R., Zhao, S., & Koo, J. (2002). Conversing across cultures: East-West communication styles in work and non-work contexts. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
30.
Scheflen, A. E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27, 316-331.
31.
Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 25-36.
32.
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. Review of Psychology and Social Psychology, 9, 113-136.
33.
Wallbott, H. G. (1995). Congruence, contagion, and motor mimicry: Mutualities in nonverbal exchange. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 82-98). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Woodside, A. G., & Davenport, J. W. (1974). Effects of salesman similarity and expertise on consumer purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 198-202.
35.
Zajonc, R. B., Adelmann, K. A., Murphy, S. T., & Niedenthal, P. M. (1987). Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 335-346.
