Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An experiment was designed to investigate how television commentary during soccer matches affects children's judgments on aggressive fouls. Dutch children (N = 96) from grades 5 and6 watcheda series of fouls on video with three types of commentary: disapproving, neutral, or approving. When the commentator disapproved of the players' aggressive actions, children rejected the fouls more strongly than when the commentator approvedof the actions. The commentary effect was found with fouls among two foreign players, fouls by foreign players against Dutch players, andfouls by Dutch players against foreign players. The commentary effect appeared to apply not only to children who did not particularly like soccer matches on television but even to children who fancied the genre.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of modelsâ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 1, 589-595.

Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory and mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bryant, J. (1989). Viewersâ enjoyment of televised sports violence. In L. A. Wenner (Ed.), Media, sports, & society (pp. 270-289). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Bryant, J. , Brown, D. , Comisky, P. W. , & Zillmann, D. (1982). Sports and spectators: Commentary and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 32(1), 109-119.

Bryant, J. , Comisky, P. , & Zillmann, D. (1981). The appeal of rough-and-tumble play in televised professional football. Communication Quarterly, 29,256-262.

Bryant, J. , & Zillmann, D. (1983). Sports violence and the media. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports violence (pp. 195-211). New York: Springer Verlag.

Comisky, P. W. , Bryant, J. , & Zillmann, D. (1977). Commentary as a substitute for action. Journal of Communication, 27(3), 150-153.

Comstock, G. , & Paik, H. (1994). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21(4), 516-546.

Corder-Bolz, C. R. (1980). Mediation: The role of significant others. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 106-118.

10.

King, C. M. (2000). Effects of humorous heroes and villains in violent action films. Journal of Communication, 50, 5-24.

11.

KLO . (2000). Sport op televisie [Sports on television]. Hilversum, the Netherlands: Dutch Broadcasting Organization, Audience Research Department.

12.

National Television Violence Study: Volume 1. (1997). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Sullivan, D. B. (1992). Commentary and viewer perception of player hostility: Adding punch to televised sports. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35, 487-504.

14.

van der Voort, T.H.A. (1986). Television violence: A child's eye view. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

15.

Zillmann, D. (1979). Hostility and aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

16.

Zillmann, D. , & Bryant, J. (1994). Entertainment as media effect. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 437-461). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Zillmann, D. , Bryant, J. , & Sapolsky, B. S. (1979). The enjoyment of watching sports contests. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, andplay (pp. 297-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

How Television Commentary Affects Children's Judgments on Soccer Fouls

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References