This two-part investigation evaluated four different explanations potentially governing theory on deprecating speech: social identity, expectancy violation, complexity-extremity, and desensitization. To test the descriptive and predictive usefulness of the first three theories, 614 participants made attributions of the perceived harm of actual racist slurs targeted at African, Asian, or Hispanic Americans. The results pointed to social identity as the most powerful theoretical construct to explain perceptions of racist speech. Although social identity concerns predicted participants' responses better than the two competing explanations, a second study further examined the complexity-extremity and desensitization theories. A sample of 36 Asian Americans demonstrated that previous exposure (low vs. high) mediated participants' perceptions of harm and levels of desensitization. Intergroup perceptions of racist speech seemingly derive from both social identity processes and previous experience. The study concludes with a discussion of the legal implications for hate speech.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, T.
(1992). Comparative experience factors among Black, Asian, and Hispanic Americans: Coalitions or conflicts. Journal of Black Studies, 23, 27-38.
2.
Bazemore, G.
(1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 768-813.
3.
Bazemore, G.
, & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 296-316.
4.
Brashers, D.
, & Jackson, S. (1999). Changing conceptions of “message effects”: A 24-Year Overview. Human Communication Research, 25, 457-477.
5.
Bryant, J.
, & Zillmann, D. (Eds.). (1994). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Burgoon, J.
(1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129-142.
7.
Burgoon, J.
(1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), International and intercultural communication annual: Vol. 19. Intercultural communication theory (pp. 194-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Burgoon, M.
(1990). Language and social influence. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 51-72). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
9.
Crocker, J.
, & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
10.
Crocker, J.
, & Quinn, D. (1998). Racism and self-esteem. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 169-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Cross, W.
(1991). Shades of Black: Diversity in African American identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12.
Dovidio, J.
, & Gaertner, S. (1998). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes, consequences, and challenges of aversive racism. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 3-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Downing, J.
(1999). Hate speech and First Amendment absolutism discourses in the US. Discourse & Society, 10, 175-189.
14.
Eberhardt, J.
, & Fiske, S. (Eds.). (1998). Confronting racism: The problem and the response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Floyd, D.
, & Voloudakis, M. (1999). Affectionate behavior in adult platonic friendships: Interpreting and evaluating expectancy violations. Human Communication Research, 25, 341-369.
16.
Groves, P.
, & Thompson, R. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory. Psychological Review, 77, 419-450.
17.
Gunther, G.
(1995). Good speech, bad speech—No. In J. Arthur & A. Shapiro (Eds.), Campus wars: Multi-culturalism and the politics of difference (pp. 109-113). Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Hall, E.
(1983). The dance of life. New York: Doubleday.
19.
Harcum, E.
(1994). A psychology of freedom and dignity: The last train to survival. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
Hecht, M.
, Collier, J., & Ribeau, S. (1993). African American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Heyman, S.
(1996). Hate speech and the constitution. New York: Garland.
22.
Hogg, M.
, & Abrams, D. (Eds.). (1993). Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
Hyde, H.
, & Fishman, G. (1991). The collegiate speech protection act of 1991: A response to the new intolerance in the academy. The Wayne Law Review, 37, 1469-1525.
24.
Jackson, S.
(1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York: Guilford.
25.
Landrine, H.
, & Klonoff, E. (1996). The schedule of racist events: A measure of racial discrimination and a study of its negative physical and mental health consequences. Journal of Black Psychology, 22, 144-168.
26.
Lederer, L.
, & Delgado, R. (Eds.). (1995). The price we pay: The case against racist speech, hate propaganda, and pornography. New York: Hill and Wang.
27.
Leets, L.
(1999, May). A cultural perspective on racist speech harm. Paper presented at the 49th International Communication Association, San Francisco.
28.
Leets, L.
(in press). Perceptions of anti-Semitism and anti-gay speech: Motives, consequences and response strategies. Journal of Social Issues.
29.
Leets, L.
, & Bowers, P. (1999). Loud and angry voices: The insidious influence. Communication Monographs, 66, 325-340.
30.
Leets, L.
, & Giles, H. (1997). Words as weapons: When do they wound? Investigations of harmful speech. Human Communication Research, 24, 260-301.
31.
Leets, L.
, & Giles, H. (1999). Harmful speech in intergroup encounters: An organizational framework for communication research. In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 22, pp. 91-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Leets, L.
, Giles, H., & Clément, R. (1996). Explicating ethnicity in theory and communication research. Multilingua, 15, 115-147.
33.
Leets, L.
, Giles, H., & Noels, K. (1999). Attributing harm to racist speech. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 20, 209-215.
34.
Linville, P.
, (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
35.
Linville, P.
, & Jones, E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.
36.
Macrae, C.
, Stangor, C., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (1996). Stereotypes and stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
37.
Marger, M.
(1997). Race and ethnic relations: American and global perspectives (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38.
Marques, J.
, & Paez, D. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of in-group deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
39.
Mathews, A.
(1971). Psychophysiological approaches to the investigation of desensitization and related procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 73-91.
40.
Matsuda, M.
, Lawrence, L., Delgado, R., & Crenshaw, K. (Eds.). (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41.
Murrell, A.
(1998). To identify or not to identify: Preserving, ignoring, and sometimes destroying racial (social) identity. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response. (pp. 188-201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Olson, J.
, Roese, N., & Zanna, M. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Druglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York: Guilford.
43.
Pettigrew, T.
, & Taylor, M. (1992). Discrimination. In E. F. Borgatta & M. L. Borgatta (Eds.), The encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. 1, pp. 498-503). New York: Macmillan.
44.
Phinney, J.
(1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176.
45.
Pinkow, L.
, Ehrlich, H., & Purvis, R. (1989). Group tensions on American colleges. Baltimore, MD: National Institute Against Prejudice and Violence. (The National Institute Against Prejudice and Violence closed in July 1993. Its publications are available from The Prejudice Institute, Stephens Hall Annex, Towson State University, Towson, MD 21204-7097)
46.
Plummer, D.
(1996). Patterns of racial identity development of African American adolescent males and females. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 168-180.
47.
Searle, J.
(1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 59-82). New York: Academic Press.
48.
Shapiro, T.
(1998). Great divides: Readings in social inequality in the United States. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
49.
Slifka, A.
(1998). Forward. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence. New York: Continuum.
50.
Stephan, W.
(1985). Intergroup relations. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 599-658). New York: Random House.
51.
Tabachnick, B.
, & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
52.
Tajfel, H.
(Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Tajfel, H.
, & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
54.
Tyler, T.
, & Smith, H. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 595-629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
55.
Weiner, E.
(Ed.). (1998). The handbook of interethnic coexistence. New York: Continuum.
56.
Worchel, S.
, Morales, F., Páez, D., & Deschamps, J. (Eds.). (1998). Social identity: International perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
