Following either a text-based, synchronous computer-mediated conversation (CMC) or a face-to-face dyadic interaction, 80 participants rated their partners' personality profile. Impressions were assessed in terms of both their breadth (the comprehensiveness of the impression) and intensity (the magnitude of the attributions). Results indicated that impressions formed in the CMC environment were less detailed but more intense than those formed face-to-face. These data provide support for theories that, in addition to acknowledging the unique constraints and characteristics of CMC, consider the cognitive strategies and heuristics involved in the impression formation process. The differential impact of a text-based medium on trait-specific impressions (e.g., extraversion, neuroticism) is also discussed in the context of a cross-modal approach to impression formation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H.
(1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bem, D. J.
(1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-16). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Borkenau, P.
, & Liebler, A. (1992). The cross-modal consistency of personality: Inferring strangers' traits from visual or acoustic information. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 183-204.
4.
Cantor, N.
, & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38-48.
5.
Clar, H. H.
(1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Costa, P. T.
, & McCrae, R. R. (1991). NEO-FFI Form S.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
Costa, P. T.
, & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
Culnan, M. J.
, & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Dubrovsky, V. J.
, Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
10.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Foltz, C.
, Morse, J. Q., Calvo, N., & Barber, J. P. (1997). Self- and observer ratings on the NEO-FFT in couples: Initial evidence of the psychometric properties of an observer form. Assessment, 4, 287-295.
12.
Funder, D. C.
(1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
13.
Funder, D. C.
, & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with inter-judge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
14.
Garton, L.
, & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 18, pp. 434-453). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Hiltz, R.S.
, Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision-making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
16.
Hogg, M. A.
, & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification. London: Routledge.
17.
Jacobson, D.
(1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5 [Online]. Available: www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html
18.
Johansen, R.,Vallee, J.
, & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. London: Addison-Wesley.
19.
John, O. P.
, & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
20.
Jones, E. E.
(1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
21.
Kenrick, D. T.
, McCreath, H. E., Govern, J., King, R., & Bordin, J. (1990).Person-environment intersections: Everyday settings and common trait dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 685-698.
22.
Kenrick, D. T.
, & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88-104.
23.
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
24.
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation, and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
25.
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-342.
26.
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Matheson, K.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Behavior, 4, 221-233.
28.
Maxwell, G. M.
, Cook, M. W., & Burr, R. (1985). The encoding and decoding of liking from behavioral cues in both auditory and visual channels. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 239-263.
29.
McCrae, R. R.
, & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
30.
Parks, M. R.
, & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-96.
31.
Scherer, K.
(1979). Personality markers in speech. In K. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social markers in speech. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Schober, M. F.
, & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
33.
Semin
, (1989). Impressions of personality revisited: The contribution of linguistic factors to attribute inferences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 85-101.
34.
Short, J.
, Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley.
35.
Siegel, J.
, Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
36.
Spears, R.
, & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the `social' in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
37.
Spears, R.
, & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
38.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
39.
Walther, J. B.
(1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
40.
Walther, J. B.
(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
41.
Walther, J. B.
(1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
42.
Walther, J. B.
, Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
43.
Walther, J. B.
, & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
44.
Williams, E.
(1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.
45.
Wyer, R. S.
, & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Wyer, R. S.
, Swan, S., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Impression formation in informal conversations. Social Cognition, 13, 243-272.
