Data from the 1975 and 1995 Dutch surveys were used to analyze the relationship between television viewing and reading behavior and the changes in this relationship over time. The central question of the article is, How do specific reader types differ in their television viewing behavior? This question is answered by using latent class analysis to identify the set of mutually exclusive latent classes of readers and by estimating the probability that each reader type will display a specific kind of content-related television viewing behavior. Kinds of print media and television programs are differentiated by referring to the extent to which they each focus on kinds of information or entertainment or both. Five reader types were identified according to how each specifically combines various reading items. Analysis of their television viewing behavior shows the existence of five audience segments with distinct background characteristics. The results give empirical substance to the notions of media orientation and audience segmentation; they document the overall decline in reading.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakker, P.
, & Scholten, O. (1999). Communicatiekaart van Nederland (2nd ed.). Houten, the Netherlans: Bohn, Stafleu & Van Loghum.
2.
Bourdieu, P.
(1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979)
3.
Burgelman, J. -C.
(1997). Issues and assumptions in communications policy and research in Western Europe: A critical analysis. In J. Corner, P. Schlesinger, & R. Silverstone (Eds.), International media research. A critical survey (pp. 123-153). London: Routledge.
4.
Christenson, P. G.
, & Roberts, D. F. (1998). It's not only rock & roll: Popular music in the lives of adolescents. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
5.
Croteau, D.
, & Hoynes, W. (2000). Media / society: Industries, images and audiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
6.
Davis, R.
, & Owen, D. (1998). New media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
DiMaggio, P.
(1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189-201.
8.
DiMaggio, P.
(1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52, 440-455.
9.
DiMaggio, P.
(1991). Social structure, institutions and cultural goods: The case of the United States. In P. Bourdieu & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Social theory for a changing society (pp. 133-155). Boulder, CO: Westview.
10.
DiMaggio, P.
, & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment and marital selection. American Journal of SociologyI, 90, 1221-1261.
11.
Ganzeboom, H.
(1984). Cultuur en informatieverwerking. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.
12.
Ganzeboom, H.
(1989). Cultuurdeelname in Nederland. Een empirischtheoretisch onderzoek naar determinanten van deelname aan culturele activiteiten. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
13.
Hagenaars, J. A.
(1990). Categorical longitudinal data—loglinear analysis of panel, trend and cohort data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Heinen, T.
(1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Janssen, S.
(1999). Art journalism and cultural change: The coverage of the arts in Dutch newspapers 1965-1990. Poetics, 26, 329-348.
16.
Knoke, D.
, & Burke, P. J. (1980). Log-linear models. London: Sage.
17.
Knulst, W.
, & Kalmijn, M. (1988). Van woord naar beeld? [From word to picture?]. Rijswijk, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Cahier #66.
18.
Knulst, W.
, & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Leesgewoonten [Reading habits]. Rijswijk, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. Sociale en Culturele Studies—23.
19.
Knulst, W.
, & Kraaykamp, G. (1998). Trends in leisure reading: Forty years of research on reading in the Netherlands. Poetics, 26(1), 21-41.
20.
Lamont, M.
(1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
McQuail, D.
(1987). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.
22.
McQuail, D.
(1997). Audience analysis. London: Sage.
23.
Neuman, W. R.
(1991). The future of the mass audience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Nos
(1976). Kyk—en lurskeronder zoek. Continu programma—onderzoch televisie te kwartaal 1975. Hilversum: Nos.
25.
Peterson, R. A.
(1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21(4), 243-258.
26.
Peterson, R. A.
, & Simkus, A. (1992). How musical tastes mark occupational status groups. In M. Lamont & M. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 152-186). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Picard, R. G.
(1989). Media economics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Saarloos, J. T.
(1989). Omroep. De programma's: Het programma-aambou. In Anoriese et al. (Eds.), De nederlandse mediagids. Handbvet voor de informarie—en communicarie—industrie, Deventer: Kluwer Bedryfswezensjappen.
29.
Scholten, O.
(1982). Krant en democratie: Een studie naar politieke informatie in landelijke dagbladen. Doctoral dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.
30.
Stichting Speurwerk betreffende het Boek
. (1981). Boekenvakboek: Cijfergids voor de informatiesector. 1980. Amsterdam: Kosmos.
31.
Stichting Speurwerk betreffende het Boek
& Nederlands Bibliotheek en Lektuur Centrum. (1991). Gids voor de informatiesector. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Author.
32.
Turow, J.
(1992). Media systems in society: Understanding industries, strategies, and power. White Plains, NY: Longman.
33.
Turow, J.
(1997). Breaking up America. Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Van den Brink, R.E.M.
(1987). Informatie over informatie. Leiden, the Netherlands: Stenfert Kroese.
35.
Van Eijck, K.
(1999a). Jazzed up, brassed off: Sociale differentiatie in patronen van muzikale genrevoorkeuren. Mens en Maatschappij, 74, 43-61.
36.
Van Eijck, K.
(1999b). Socialization, education and lifestyle: How social mobility increases the cultural heterogeneity of status groups. Poetics, 26, 309-328.
37.
Van Neerven, J.P.S.
(1991). De dagbladuitgever als ondernemer. Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen.
38.
Van Rees, K.
, Vermunt, J., & Verboord, M. (1999). Cultural classifications under discussion: Latent class analysis of highbrow and lowbrow reading. Poetics, 26, 349-367.
39.
Vermunt, J. K.
(1996). Log-linear event history analysis: A general approach with missing data, unobserved heterogeneity, and latent variables. Tilburg, the Netherlands: TUP.
40.
Vermunt, J. K.
(1997). Log-linear models for event histories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Weibull, L.
(1985). Structural factors in gratification research. In K. E. Rosengren, P. Palmgreen, & L. Wenner (Eds.), Media gratifications research: Current perspectives (pp. 123-147). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Weibull, L.
(1992). The status of the daily newspaper. What readership research tells us about the role of newspapers in the mass media system. Poetics, 21(4), 259-282.
43.
Wynne, D.
, & O'Connor, J. O. (1998). Consumption and the postmodern city. Urban Studies, 35, 841-864.
