Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of two types of background television programs on students' performance on easy and difficult homework assignments. In both experiments, students in Grade 8 (Experiment 1: N = 90; Experiment 2: N = 144) were matched on reading proficiency. Subsequently, the participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions in which they did homework with (a) a Dutch-language soap opera, (b) English-language music videos, or (c) no television in the background. The execution of homework was hindered only when it was combined with watching a soap opera. The distraction effect of the soap opera was expressed either in a performance decrement (Experiment 1) or in an extension of performance time (Experiment 2).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aarnoutse, C.A.J.
(1992). Synoniementest, tegenstellingentest, voegwoordentest, hoofdgedachtentest [Synonyms test, opposites test, conjunctions test, and principal ideas test]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
2.
Alwitt, L. F.
, Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., & Levin, S. R. (1980). Preschool children's visual attention to attributes of television. Human Communication Research, 7, 52-67.
3.
Anderson, D. R.
, & Lorch, E. P. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction? In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.), Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 1-33). New York: Academic Press.
4.
Anderson, K. J.
, & Revelle, W. (1982). Impulsivity, caffeine, and proofreading: A test of the Easterbrook hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 614-624.
5.
Armstrong, G. B.
(1993). Cognitive interference from background television: Structural effects on verbal and spatial processing. Communication Studies, 44, 56-70.
6.
Armstrong, G. B.
(1997, May). Context and effects of background television on reading: A test of television effects on encoding, recall, and recognition. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
7.
Armstrong, G. B.
, Boiarsky, G. A., & Mares, M. L. (1991). Background television and reading performance. Communication Monographs, 58, 235-253.
8.
Armstrong, G. B.
, & Greenberg, B. S. (1990). Background television as an inhibitor of cognitive processing. Human Communication Research, 16, 355-386.
9.
Armstrong, G. B.
, & Sopory, P. (1997). Effects of background television on phonological and visuo-spatial working memory. Communication Research, 24, 459-506.
10.
Beentjes, J.W.J.
, Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort, T.H.A. (1996). Combining background media with doing homework: Incidence of background media use and perceived effects. Communication Education, 45, 59-72.
11.
Cook, R. D.
(1977). Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics, 19, 15-18.
12.
Cook, R. D.
, & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. New York: Chapman & Hall.
13.
Cool, V. A.
, Yarbrough, D. B., Patton, J. E., Runde, R., & Keith, T. Z. (1994). Experimental effects of radio and television distractors on children's performance on mathematics and reading assignments. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 181-194.
14.
Daoussis, L.
, & McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Musical preferences and effects of music on a reading comprehension test for extraverts and introverts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 283-289.
15.
de Vos, T.
(1992). Tempo test rekenen [Arithmetic speed test]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
16.
de Vos, T.
(1995). Niveau test rekenen [Arithmetic level test]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
17.
Etaugh, C.
, & Ptasnik, P. (1982). Effects of studying to music and post-study relaxation on reading comprehension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 141-142.
18.
Fogelson, S.
(1973). Music as a distractor on reading-test performance of eighth grade students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 1265-1266.
19.
Furnham, A.
, & Bradley, A. (1997). Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 445-455.
20.
Furnham, A.
, Gunter, B., & Peterson, E. (1994). Television distraction and the performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 705-711.
21.
Geiger, S.
, & Reeves, B. (1993). The effects of scene changes and semantic relatedness on attention to television. Communication Research, 20, 155-175.
22.
Gilissen, J.
, & Aarnoutse, C. (1996). Leesvaardighedentoets [Reading comprehension test]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
23.
Graydon, J.
, & Eysenck, M. W. (1989). Distraction and cognitive performance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 161-179.
24.
Grimes, T.
(1991). Mild auditory-visual dissonance in television news may exceed viewer attentional capacity. Human Communication Research, 18, 268-298.
25.
Heuer, H.
1996. Dual-task performance. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action, volume 3: Attention (pp. 113-154). London: Academic Press.
26.
Kahneman, D.
(1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Kiger, D. M.
(1989). Effects of music information load on a reading comprehension task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 531-534.
28.
Kirk, R. E.
(1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29.
Lang, A.
(1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17, 275-299.
30.
Lang, A.
(1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22, 86-115.
31.
Lang, A.
, Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Summer, J. (1993). The effects of related and unrelated cuts on television viewers' attention, processing capacity, and memory. Communication Research, 20, 4-29.
32.
Livingstone, S.
, Holden, K. J., & Bovill, M. (1999). Children's changing media environment: Overview of a European comparative study. In C. von Feilitzen & U. Carlsson (Eds.), Children and media: Image, education, participation (pp. 39-59). Göteborg: UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen.
33.
Martin, R. C.
, Wogalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 382-398.
34.
Matthews, K. A.
, & Brunson, B. I. (1979). Allocation of attention and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2081-2090.
35.
Norman, D.
, & Bobrow, D. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
36.
Patton, J. E.
, Routh, D. K., & Offenbach, S. I. (1981). Televised classroom events as distractors for reading-disabled children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9, 355-370.
37.
Patton, J. E.
, Stinard, T. A., & Routh, D. K. (1983). Where do children study?Journal of Educational Research, 76, 280-286.
38.
Reeves, B.
, Thorson, E., Rothschild, M. L., McDonald, D., Hirsch, J., & Goldstein, R. (1985). Attention to television: Intrastimulus effects of movement and scene changes on alpha variations over time. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 241-255.
39.
Salamé, P.
, & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 107-122.
40.
Sanders, G. S.
, & Baron, R. S. (1975). The motivating effects of distraction on task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 956-963.
41.
Stevens, J. P.
(1989). Power of the multivariate analysis of variance tests. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 728-737.
42.
Strube, M. J.
, Turner, C. W., Patrick, S., & Perrillo, R. (1983). Type A and Type B attentional responses to aesthetic stimuli: Effects on mood and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1369-1379.
43.
Styles, E. A.
(1997). The psychology of attention. Hove: Psychology Press.
44.
Tabachnick, B. G.
, & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
45.
Thorson, E.
, & Lang, A. (1992). The effects of television videographics and lecture familiarity on adult cardiac orienting responses and memory. Communication Research, 19, 346-369.
46.
van der Voort, T.H.A.
, Beentjes, J.W.J., Bovill, M., Gaskell, G., Koolstra, C. M., Livingstone, S., & Marseille, N. (1998). Young people's ownership and uses of new and old forms of media in Britain and the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 13, 457-477.
47.
van Kan, N.
, & Aarnoutse, C. (1993). Begrijpend leestest bestemd voor het eerste leerjaar van het MAVO, HAVO en VWO [Reading comprehension test intended for students in Grade 7]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Berkhout.
48.
Yerkes, R. M.
, & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology of Psychology, 18, 459-482.
49.
Zillmann, D.
(1982). Television viewing and arousal. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (Vol. 2, pp. 53-67). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
