Abstract
The origins of standards of competency to stand trial are in English common law. Present standards in use are outlined and discussed. Procedures for evaluation of trial competency are in the developing stages; a variety of these procedures are discussed and critiqued. Data from a trial competency program suggest the need for greater sophistication in competency evaluations. Further methodological and philosophical clarity would assist the clinician in making meaningful determinations of competency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
