Psychiatric training and involuntary commitment

Abstract

This article contrasts through example and discussion a ritual indoctrination versus a rational procedure in the training of the psychiatrist. The use of trainees as professional surrogates, conflict-of-interest problems, and confusion and lack of discrimination between forensic/psychiatric and service/training issues are discussed. The pivotal role of the trainee in the commitment procedure demands immediate relief. Longer-term provision of standards of training and competency is suggested.