Abstract
The theoretical justification of a constitutional “right to treatment” has been that it makes up for the “deprivation of liberty” stemming out of involuntary commitment. The Supreme Court, however, in 1975 rejected this quid pro quo theory. Though it went without acceptance, the loss of liberty rationale underlying it has had an impact, and will continue to do so.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
