Dr. Robert Sadoff's teaching of honesty and integrity in forensic psychiatric work resonates both with current ethical principles and the ancient proscription against bearing false witness against one's fellow citizen. This article explores the misuse of psychiatric testimony in a 1928–1929 murder prosecution in Innsbruck, Austria. Amid clear undercurrents of Nazism, a Jewish youth found himself on trial for the murder of his father. Though there was no evidence that he was guilty, the expert testimony included distorted presentations of psychology and Freud's theory of the Oedipus complex. Freud and others protested the misuse of his work to convict the defendant, noting the difficulty in adapting psychoanalytic theory to legal settings. After 2 years in prison, the young man was set free, later becoming a world-renowned portrait photographer. Forensic professionals must continue to be vigilant in self-regulating the use of scientific information in legal settings.
AndersonK. (1998). The young Eric Fromm's contribution to criminology. Justice Quarterly, 15, 667–696.
2.
AschS.S. (1974). Some superego considerations in crime and punishment. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 2, 159–181.
3.
BaatzS. (2008). For the Thrill of It. New York: HarperCollins.
4.
BonnieR.J. (2002). Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union and in China: Complexities and controversies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 136–144.
5.
BourgetD.GagnéP., & LabelleM.-E. (2007). Parricide: A comparative study of matricide versus patricide. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35, 306–312.
6.
BrockhausenC.PesslerF., & HupkaJ. (1931). Der Fall Halsmann [The Halsmann Case]. Vienna: Gilhofer & Ranschburg.
7.
CahnE. (1961). The lawyer as scientist and scoundrel: Reflections on Francis Bacon's quadricentennial. New York University Law Review, 36, 1–12.
8.
DennoD.W. (2005). Criminal law in a post-Freudian world. University of Illinois Law Review, 2005, 601–697.
9.
DiamondB.L. (1973). The psychiatrist as advocate. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 1, 5–21.
10.
Durham v. United States, 214 F. 2d. 862 (1954).
11.
EliasbergW. (1946). Forensic psychology. Southern California Law Review, 19, 349–409.
12.
EmanuelN. (2008). Philippe Halsman, a personal story. In Touch [newsletter of the American Friends of the Jewish Museum Hohenems], 9, 8–13.
13.
FreudS. (1906/1959). Psycho-analysis and the establishment of the facts in legal proceedings. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. IX (1906–1908) (pp. 103–114). London: Hogarth Press.
14.
FreudS. (1928/1959). Dostoevsky and parricide. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXI (1927–1931) (pp. 177–196). London: Hogarth Press.
15.
FreudS. (1930, December 14). Das facultätsgutachten im prozeß Halsmann [The expert opinion in the Halsmann trial]. Neue Freie Presse, p. 13.
16.
FreudS. (1931/1959). The expert opinion in the Halsmann case. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXI (1927–1931), (pp. 251–253). London: Hogarth Press.
17.
GoldsteinJ. (1968). Psychoanalysis and jurisprudence. Yale Law Journal, 77, 1053–1077.
18.
GutmannW., & BleulerE. (1931). Das Faultätsgutachten im Fall Halsmann (Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit) [The Faculty Opinions in the Halsmann Case (Opportunity and Probability)]. Berlin: Drei Masken Verlag.
19.
HarrisR. (2010). Dreyfus: Politics, emotion, and the scandal of the century. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
20.
HofingerN. (1994). “Unsere Losung ist: Tirol den Tirolern!” Antisemitismus in Tirol [“Our password is: Tyrol the Tyrolese!” Anti-Semitism in Tyrol] 1918–1938. Zeitgeschichte, 21, 83–108.
21.
HofingerN. (1995). Die Halsmann-Affäre [The Halsmann Affair] in Innsbruck 1928–31. In GehlerM. & SickingerH. (Eds.), Politische Skandale und Affären in Österreich. Von Mayerling bis Waldheim (pp. 148–187). Vienna: Studienverlag.
22.
HupkaJ. (1930a, November 29). Fiat Iustitia [Let there be justice]. The foundations of the invalid verdicts. Neue Freie Presse, pp. 3–4.
23.
HupkaJ. (1930b, November 30). Fiat Iustitia [Let there be justice]. The mechanism of repression, fatigue manslaughter and the Oedipus complex. Neue Freie Presse, pp. 8–9.
24.
JonesE. (1957). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. Volume 3: The last phase, 1919–1939. New York: Basic Books.
25.
KahrB. (2005). Letter from London: Why Freud turned down $25,000: Mental health professionals in the witness box. American Imago, 62, 365–371.
26.
KatzJ.GoldsteinJ., & DershowitzA.M. (1967). Psychoanalysis, psychiatry and the law. New York: The Free Press.
27.
KaudersA.D. (2011). “Psychoanalysis is good, synthesis is better”: The German reception of Freud, 1930 and 1956. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 47, 380–397.
28.
KijakM. (2004). Freud y el proceso Halsmann [Freud and the Halsmann trial]. Revista de Psicoanálisis, 62, 531–546.
29.
MalmquistC.P. (2010). Adolescent parricide as a clinical and legal problem. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 73–79.
30.
MarbeK. (1932). Der Strafprozeß gegen Philipp Halsmannx [The Prosecution of Philipp Halsmann]. Leipzig: C.L. Hirschfeld.
31.
PollackM. (2002/2007). Anklage Vatermord: Der Fall Philipp Halsmann [Accusation patricide: The Philipp Halsmann case]. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.
32.
PollackS. (1964). Franz Alexander's observations on psychiatry and law. American Journal of Psychiatry, 121, 458–464.
33.
RatnerA. (2009). The jump artist. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.
34.
RayI. (1833). Review of the medical testimony in a case of alleged murder. Medical Magazine, 2, 18–28.
35.
SadoffR.L. (2011). Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: Minimizing harm. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
36.
SinclairJ. (Writer Director). (2008). Jump [Motion Picture]. United States:————.
37.
WanghM. (1973). Psychiatric misjudgments in German restitution proceedings: Blindness or spite?Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 1, 39–48.
