Individuals with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) are treated differently by the criminal justice system in sex offense prosecutions, depending upon whether they are categorized as victims or perpetrators. The primary and secondary disabilities associated with prenatal alcohol exposure are often taken into consideration when assessing the capacity of a victim to consent to sexual activity, but generally not considered in determining whether a defendant had the mens rea to engage in criminal sexual conduct. This article traces the historical underpinnings of the mens rea requirement in criminal law and discusses its elimination in most prosecutions for statutory rape. The article recommends that additional research be conducted to determine the impact of prenatal alcohol exposure on an individual's capacity to consent to sexual activity. It suggests that fundamental principles of culpability require an examination of how FASD impacts an individual's capacity to engage in meaningful, responsible, decision making about sexual activity before criminal sanctions are imposed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BlackstoneW. (1871). Commentaries on the law of England, II. Chicago: Callaghan & Cockcroft.
3.
BurdL.SelfridgeR.KlugM., & BakkoS. (2004). Fetal alcohol syndrome in the United States corrections system. Addiction Biology, 9(2), 169–176.
4.
Carmichael-OlsonH.FeldmanJ. J.StreissguthA. P.SampsonP. D., & BooksteinF. L. (1998). Neuropsychological deficits in adolescents with fetal alcohol syndrome: Clinical findings. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 22, 1998–2012.
5.
CarpenterC. L. (2003). On statutory rape, strict liability, and the public welfare offense model. American University Law Review, 53, 313–385.
6.
ChartrandL. N., & Forbes-ChilibeckE. (2003). The sentencing of offenders with fetal alcohol syndrome. Health Law Journal, 11, 35–70.
7.
ChudleyA. E.ConryJ.CookJ. L.LoockC.RosalesT., & LeBlancN. (2005). Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Canadian guidelines for diagnosis. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172, S1–S21.
8.
ConnorP. D.SampsonP. D.BooksteinF. L.BarrH. M., & StreissguthA. P. (2000). Direct and indirect effects of prenatal alcohol damage on executive function. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18(3), 331–354.
9.
DennoD. W. (1997). Sexuality, rape, and mental retardation. University of Illinois Law Review, 1997, 315–434.
10.
FastD. K., & ConryJ. (2009). Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and the criminal justice system. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(3), 250–257.
11.
JohnsonE. A. (2009). Mens rea for sexual abuse: The case for defining the acceptable risk. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 99, 1–50.
12.
KennedyC. H., & NiederbuhlJ. (2001). Establishing criteria for sexual consent capacity. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106(6), 503–510.
13.
KernsK. A.AudryD.MateerC. A.StreissguthA. P. (1997). Cognitive deficits in nonretarded adults with fetal alcohol syndrome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 685–693.
14.
KodituwakkuP. W.KalbergW., & MayP. M. (2001). The effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on executive functioning. Alcohol Research & Health, 25, 192–198.
15.
MattsonS. N.GoodmanA. M.CaineC.DelisD. C., & RileyE. P. (1999). Executive functioning in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 23(11), 1808–1815.
16.
Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952).
17.
MurphyG. H., & O'CallaghanA. (2004). Capacity of adults with intellectual disabilities to consent to sexual relationships. Psychological Medicine, 34, 1347–1357.
18.
Nevins-SaundersE. (2010). Incomprehensible crimes: Defendants with mental retardation charged with statutory rape. New York University Law Review, 85, 1067–1129.
19.
NolandJ.S.SingerL. T.ArendtR. E.MinnesS.ShortE. J., & BearerC. F. (2003). Executive functioning in preschool-age children prenatally exposed to alcohol, cocaine, and marijuana. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 27, 647–656.
20.
NovickN. (1997). FAS: Preventing and treating sexual deviancy. In StreissguthA. & KanterJ. (Eds.), The challenge of fetal alcohol syndrome: Overcoming secondary disabilities (pp. 162–170). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
21.
RasmussenC. (2005). Executive functioning and working memory in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 29(8), 1359–1367.
22.
RasmussenC., & WyperK. (2007). Decision making, executive functioning and risky behaviors in adolescents with prenatal alcohol exposure. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 6(4), 405–416.
23.
ReichNoteJ. F.. (2004). “No provincial or transient notion”: The need for a mistake of age defense in child rape prosecutions. Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, 693–740.
24.
RoachK. W., & BaileyA. (2009). The relevance of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Canadian criminal law from investigation to sentencing. University of British Columbia Law Review, 42, 1–68.
25.
SayreF. B. (1932). Mens rea. Harvard Law Review, 45, 974–1026.
26.
SchalockR. L.LuckassonR. A., & ShogrenK. A. (2007). The renaming of mental retardation: Understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 116–124.
27.
SchonfeldA. M.MattsonS.LangA. R.DelisD. C., & RileyE. P. (2001). Verbal and nonverbal fluency in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 239–246.
28.
SchonfeldA. M.PaleyB.FrankelF., & O'ConnorM. J. (2006). Executive functioning predicts social skills following prenatal alcohol exposure. Child Neuropsychology, 12, 439–452.
29.
S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 22-22-1.2 (1994).
30.
State v. Bonner, 577 N.W.2d 575 (S.D. 1997) (Nos. 19960/19961) (Brief of appellant) (on file with author).
31.
State v. Bonner, 577 N.W.2d 575 (S.D. 1998).
32.
State v. Fulks, 60 N.W.2d 418 (S.D. 1968).
33.
State v. Ortega-Martinez, 881 P.2d 231 (Wash. 1994).
34.
StavisP. F. (1991). Harmonizing the right to sexual expression and the right to protection from harm for persons with mental disability. Sexuality and Disability, 9, 131–141.
35.
StreissguthA. P.AaseJ. M.ClarrenS. K.RandeisS. P.LaDueR. A., & SmithD. F. (1991). Fetal alcohol syndrome in adolescents and adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 26(5), 1961–1967.
36.
StreissguthA. P.BooksteinF. L.BarrH. M.SampsonP. D.O'MalleyK., & YoungJ. K. (2004). Risk factors for adverse life outcomes in fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effects. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25(4), 228–238.
37.
SundramC. J., & StavisP. F. (1994). Sexuality and mental retardation: Unmet challenges. Mental Retardation, 32, 255–264.
38.
United States v. Cordoba-Hincapie, 825 F. Supp. 485 (E.D.N.Y. 1993).
39.
United States v. Root, 08-cr-00053-JLK-01 (D. Colo. March 6, 2009) (Plea agreement and statement of facts relevant to sentencing) (on file with author).
40.
United States v. Root, 08-cr-00053-JLK-01 (D. Colo. July 13, 2009) (Judgment) (on file with author).
41.
Wash. Rev. Code Ann. §§ 9A.44.073 to 9A.44.079 (1988).
42.
Wash. Rev. Code. Ann. § 9A.44.050 (2007).
43.
WhaleyS.O'ConnorM., & GundersonB. (2001). Comparison of the adaptive functioning of children prenatally exposed to alcohol to a nonexposed clinic sample. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 25, 1018–1024.
