This article explores issues that judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, treatment providers, and defendants face when a person who has, or may have, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) is charged with a crime. The article is divided into three sections: the first section discusses basic legal concepts and how they relate to those in the criminal justice system who suffer from FASD; the second section examines case studies and lessons learned from the therapeutic drug court, a program of the King County Superior Court in Seattle, Washington; the final section presents case studies of serious felonies, and explores constitutional issues.
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 305 (fn.5), 308–09 (2002).
4.
BertrandJ.FloydR.L.WeberM.K.O'ConnorM.RileyE.O.JohnsonK.A. (2004). National Task Force on FAS/FAE, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Guidelines for Referral and Diagnosis. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348, 349, 364 (1996).
8.
Death Penalty Information Center. (1997). Mental retardation and the death penalty: Status of exemption legislation. Mental & Physical Disabilities Law Reporter, 687, Sept.–Oct.
9.
Dillbeck v. State, 643 So.2d 1027, at 1029–30 (Fla. 1994).
10.
Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162, 171–72 (1975).
11.
FergusonG. (1989). A critique of proposals to reform the insanity defense. Queen's L.J.14, 135, 140.
12.
Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 398 (1993).
13.
Graham v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 176 (May 17, 2010).
14.
GreenspanS. (2010, April). Paper presented at the National H.A.T. (Federal Public Defenders) Annual Death Penalty Mitigation Conference, Seattle, WA.
15.
Ex parte Hearn, 310 S.W.3d 424 (Tex.App. 2010).
16.
Hearn v. Quarterman, 2009 WL 3362041 (N.D.Tex. Aug. 12, 2008) (No. CIV.A.3:04-CV-0450-D).
17.
Hicks v. Schofield, 278 Ga. 159, 599 S.E.2d 156 (Ga. 2004), cert denied by Hicks v. Schofield, 542 U.S. 953 (2004).
18.
Hurst v. Florida, 18 So.3d 975 (Fla. 2009).
19.
In the Matter of S.M.S., a Youth, 355 Mont. 102, 104, 225 P.3rd 781 (2010).
20.
In re Brett, 142 Wash.2d 868, 16 P.3d 601 (2001).
21.
Lafferty v. Cook, 949 F.2d 1546, 1548 (10th Cir. 1991).
22.
Lambert v. Blodgett, 393 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 2004).
23.
Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 378 (1966).
24.
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), abrogated by Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
25.
People v. Wybrecht, 222 Mich.App.160, 564 N.W.2d 903 (Mich.App. 1997).
26.
R. v. Ruzic, [2001]1 S.C.R. 687, 694 (Supreme Court of Canada).
27.
Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374, 383–84 (2005).
28.
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 588 (2005).
29.
Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465 (2007).
30.
Silva v. Woodford, 279 F.3d 825 (9th Cir. 2002).
31.
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1998), abrogated by Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
32.
Stankewitz v. Woodford, 365 F.3d 706 (9th Cir. 2004).
33.
State v. Brett, 126 Wash.2d 868, 892 P.2d 29 (1995).
34.
State v. Cooper, 410 N.J.Super. 43, 979 A.2d 792 (2009).
35.
State v. Oritz, 104 Wash.2d 479 (2001).
36.
StrattonK.HoweC., & BattagliaF. (Eds.). (1996). Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention, and treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37.
StreissguthA. (1998). Attaining human rights, civil rights, and criminal justice for people with fetal alcohol syndrome. TASH Newsletter, Sept. 18–20.
38.
StreissguthA. P.BarrH. M.KoganJ., & BooksteinF. L. (1996) Understanding the Occurrence of Secondary Disabilities in Clients with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) and Fetal Alcohol Effects (FAE). Final Report. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Publication Services.
39.
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1989).
40.
U.S. v. Duhon, 104 F.Supp. 2d. 663 (W.D.La. 2000).
41.
U.S. v. Dusky, 362 U.S. 402, 403 (1960).
42.
U.S. v. Nelson, 419 F.Supp. 2d. 891, 897 (E.D. La. 2006).
