Many of the wrongful convictions that have been brought to light over the last decade have their roots in the interrogation phase of criminal investigations where coerced or false confessions are sometimes extracted from detained crime suspects. A “simple” solution has been advanced to correct this particular problem: video record all custodial interrogations. Certainly, such a procedural modification has the potential to improve the administration of justice; however, prudence calls for some consideration of its possible pitfalls. Toward that end, we briefly review some relevant psychological science that points to significant limitations inherent in the video-recording practice. Some limitations can be offset with proper implementation of the practice, and in these instances we provide research-based recommendations for achieving it. Other drawbacks, however, cannot be as easily rectified, and in these cases criminal justice practitioners and mental health professionals should heed the old adage, “forewarned is forearmed,” when making use of video-recorded interrogations.
BalcetisE., & DunningD. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612–625.
2.
BalcetisE., & LassiterG. D. (Eds.). (in press). The social psychology of visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.
3.
BondC.F.Jr., & DePauloB.M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
4.
BullR., & MilneB. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In LassiterG.D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
5.
BullR., & SoukaraS. (in press). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In LassiterG. D. & MeissnerC. A. (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Colorado v. Spring, 479 U. S. 564 (1987).
7.
DarleyJ. M., & GrossP. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
8.
DeClueG. (2005). Interrogations and disputed confessions: A manual for forensic psychological practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.
9.
DeClueG. (in press). Oral Miranda warnings: A checklist and a model presentation. In LassiterG. D. & MeissnerC. A. (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
DePauloB. M.StoneJ. I., & LassiterG. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In SchenklerB. R. (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
DrizinS.A., & ColganB.A. (2001). Let the cameras roll: Mandatory videotaping of interrogations is the solution to Illinois' problem of false confessions. Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, 32, 337–424.
13.
FrumkinI. B. (in press). Evaluations of competency to waive Miranda rights and coerced/false confessions: Common pitfalls in expert testimony. In LassiterG. D. & MeissnerC. A. (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
GellerW. A. (1992). Police videotaping of suspect interrogations and confessions: A preliminary examination of issues and practices (A report to the National Institute of Justice). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
15.
GilbertD. T., & MaloneP. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
16.
HastorfA., & CantrilH. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129–134.
JohnsonG. (1997). False confessions and fundamental fairness: The need for electronic recording of custodial interrogations. Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 6, 719–751.
19.
JonesE. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 107–117.
20.
KahanD.HoffmanD. A., & BramanD. (in press). Whose eyes are you going to believe: Scott v. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review.
21.
KassinS. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.
22.
KassinS. M., & GudjonssonG. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions. A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67.
23.
KassinS. M., & SukelH. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the “harmless error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46.
24.
LassiterG. D. (Ed.). (2004). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
25.
LassiterG. D., & GeersA. L. (2004). Bias and accuracy in the evaluation of confession evidence. In LassiterG. D. (Ed.), Interrogations, Confessions and Entrapment (pp. 197–214). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
26.
LassiterG. D.GeersA. L.MunhallP. J.HandleyI. M., & BeersM. J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 33 (pp. 189–254). New York: Academic.
27.
LassiterG. D.GeersA. L.MunhallP. J.Ploutz-SnyderR. J., & BreitenbecherD. L. (2002). Illusory causation: Why it occurs. Psychological Science, 13, 299–305.
28.
LassiterG. D.LindbergM. J.RatcliffJ. J., & WareL. J. (in press). Top-down influences on the perception of ongoing behavior. In BalcetisE. & LassiterG. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.
29.
LassiterG. D.RatcliffJ. J.WareL. J., & IrvinC. R. (2006). Videotaped confessions: Panacea or Pandora's box?Law and Policy, 28, 192–210.
30.
LassiterG. D.WareL. J., & LindbergM. J., & RatcliffJ. J. (in press). Videotaping custodial interrogations: Toward a scientifically based policy. In LassiterG. D. & MeissnerC. A. (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U. S. 477 (1972).
32.
LeoR.A. (2004). The third degree and the origins of psychological interrogation in the United States. In LassiterG.D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 37–84). New York: Kluwer Academic.
33.
MassadC. M.Hubbard, & NewtsonD. (1979). Selective perception of events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 513–532.
34.
McArthurL. Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507–519.
35.
MeissnerC. A.RussanoM. B., & NarchetF. M. (in press). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. In LassiterG. D. & MeissnerC. A. (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
OfsheR., & LeoR. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 16, 189–251.
37.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 10 (pp. 174–220). New York: Academic Press.
38.
RossL., & WardA. (1996). Naive realism: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In BrownT.ReedE., & TurielE. (Eds.), Values and Knowledge (pp. 103–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39.
Scott v. Harris, 550 U. S. 372 (2007).
40.
State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587, 591 (Minn., 1994).
41.
Stephan v. State, 711 P. 2d 1156, 1162 (Alaska, 1985).
42.
SullivanT. P. (2004). Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations. Chicago: Northwestern University School of Law, Center on Wrongful Convictions.
43.
SullivanT. P. (2005). Electronic recording of custodial interrogations: Everybody wins. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 1127–1144.
44.
TaylorS. E., & FiskeS. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomenon. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 11 (pp. 249–288). New York: Academic Press.
45.
VrijA. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, England: Wiley.
46.
ZadnyJ., & GerardH. (1974). Attributed intentions and informational selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 513–532.
