In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held in the landmark case of Atkins v. Virginia (2002) that the execution of individuals who have mental retardation is unconstitutional. Following the Atkins holding, courts in death penalty jurisdictions have relied heavily upon mental health professionals in making a determination of whether or not capital offenders have mental retardation. The determination of mental retardation in death penalty cases, however, presents complex challenges for both courts and mental health professionals. In addition, there is variability in how death penalty states define mental retardation and in the assessment methods used by mental health professionals to diagnose mental retardation in such cases. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe how statutes in death penalty jurisdictions have operationalized the various clinical definitions of mental retardation, (b) discuss issues confronting examiners in assessing and diagnosing mental retardation in Atkins cases, and (c) provide recommendations for forensic practice.
American Association on Mental Deficiency. (1983). Classification in mental retardation (8th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Association on Mental Retardation. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Association on Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
American Psychological Association, Division 33, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities. (1996). Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation. JacobsonJ.W.MulickJ.A. (Eds). Washington, DC: Author.
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed. Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author.
6.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.
7.
AnastasiA.UrbinaS. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper River Saddle, NJ: Prentiss-Hall, Inc.
BaroffG. S. (1991). Establishing mental retardation in capital cases: A potential matter of life and death. Mental Retardation, 29 (6). 343–349.
11.
BaroffG. S. (2003). Establishing mental retardation in capital cases: An update. Mental Retardation, 41, (3), 198–202.
12.
BeaberR. J.MarstonA.MichelliJ.MillsM. J. (1985). A brief test for measuring malingering in schizophrenic individuals. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 1478–1481.
13.
Beirne-SmithM.PattonJ.IttenbachR. (1994). Mental retardation (4th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
14.
BenderL. (1938). A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use. New York: The Orthopsychiatric Association.
15.
BonnieR. J. (2004). The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: Implementing Atkins v. Virginia. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 32. 304–308.
16.
BonnieR. J.GustafsonK. (2007). The challenge of implementing Atkins v. Virginia: How legislatures and courts can promote accurate assessments and adjudications of mental retardation in death penalty cases. Richmond Law Review, 41(4), 811–860.
17.
BooneK.LuP.HerzbergD. (2002). The Dot Counting Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
18.
BrodskyS. L.GallowayV. A. (2003). Ethical and professional demands for forensic mental health professionals in the post-Atkins era. Ethics and Behavior, 13, 3–9.
19.
BruininksR. H.WoodcockR.W.WeathermanR. F.HillB. K. (1996). S1B-R: Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised. Itaska, IL: Riverside.
20.
ButcherJ. N.DahlstromW. G.GrahamJ. R.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1989). Manual for administration and scoring, MMPI-2. University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota.
21.
Chase v. State, 873 So.2d 1029 (Miss. 2004).
22.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665.
23.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
DeMatteoD.MarczykG.PichM. (2007). A national survey of state legislation defining mental retardation: Implications for policy and practice afterAtkins. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 781–802.
26.
DoaneB. M.SalekinK. L. (in press). Susceptibility of current adaptive behavior measures to feigned deficits. Law and Human Behavior.
27.
DuvallJ. C.MorrisR. J. (2006). Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37 (6), 658–665.
28.
EdgertonR. B. (1967). The cloak of competence: Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
EdgertonR. B. (1993). The cloak of competence: Revised and updated. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
EllisJ. W. (2003). Mental retardation and the death penalty: A guide to state legislative issues. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 27 (1), 11–24.
31.
EveringtonC.KeyesD. (1999). Diagnosing mental retardation in criminal proceedings: The importance of documenting adaptive behavior. Forensic Examiner, 8, 31–34.
32.
EveringtonC.OlleyJ. G. (2004). An analysis of forensic psychological evaluations in capital cases involving defendants with mental retardation: Has Atkins made a difference? Paper presented in March, 2004 at the conference of the American Psychology-Law Society. Scottsdale, AZ.
33.
EveringtonC.OlleyJ. G. (2008). Implications of Atkins v. Virginia: Issues in defining and diagnosing mental retardation. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(1), 1–23.
34.
Ex parte Briseno, 135 S.W.3d 1 (2004).
35.
FinlayW. M.LyonsE. (2001). Methodological issues in interviewing and using self-report questionnaires with people with mental retardation. Psychological Assessment, 13, 319–335.
36.
FlynnJ. R. (1984a). IQ gains and the Binet decrements. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 283–290.
37.
FlynnJ. R. (1984b). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 29–51.
38.
FlynnJ. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–191.
39.
FlynnJ. R. (1998). WAIS-III and WISC-III IQ gains in the United States from 1972 to 1995: How to compensate for obsolete norms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 1231–1239.
40.
FlynnJ. R. (2006). Tethering the elephant: Capital cases, IQ, and the Flynn Effect. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 12, 170–189.
41.
FlynnJ. R. (2007). Capital offenders and the death sentence: A scandal that must be addressed. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 3–7.
42.
Foster v. State, 848 So 2d 175 (Miss. 2003).
43.
FrumkinI. B. (2003). Mental retardation: A primer to cope with expert testimony. Cornerstone, 25(2), 6–23.
44.
GarciaL. F.RuizM. A.AbadF. J. (2003). Factor structure of the Spanish WAIS-III. Psicothema, 15, 155–160.
45.
GoldbergJ. O.MillerH. R. (1986). Performance of psychiatric inpatients and intellectually deficient individuals on a task that assesses the validity of memory complaints. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 43–46.
46.
GraueL. O.BerryD. T. R.ClarkJ. A.SolimanM. J.CardiM.HopkinsJ.WerlineD. (2007). Identification of feigned mental retardation using the new generation of malingering detection instruments: Preliminary findings. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 929–942.
47.
GreenspanS. (1997). Dead manual walking? Why the 1992 definition needs redoing. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 179–90.
48.
GreenspanS. (1999). What is meant by mental retardation?International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 6–18.
49.
GreenspanS. (2006). Issues in the use of the “Flynn Effect” to adjust IQ scores when diagnosing MR. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(3), 3–7.
50.
GreenspanS. (2007). Flynn-adjustment is a matter of basic fairness: Response to Roger B. Moore, Jr. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 7–8.
51.
GreenspanS.LaughlinG.BlackR. S. (2001). Credulity and gullibility in people with developmental disorders: A framework for future research. In GliddenL. M. (Ed.). International review of research in mental retardation. (Vol. 24, pp. 101–135). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
GreenspanS.SwitzkyH. J.GranfieldJ. M. (1996). Everyday intelligence and adaptive behavior: A theoretical framework. In JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ. A. (Eds.). Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation (pp. 127–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53.
GreenspanS.SwitzkyH. N. (2003). Execution exemption should be based on actual vulnerability, not disability label. Ethics and Behavior, 13, 19–26.
54.
GuilmetteT. J.HartK. J.GuilianoA. J.LeiningerB. E. (1994). Detecting simulated memory impairment: Comparison of the Rey Fifteen-Item Test and the Hiscock Forced-Choice Procedure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 283–294.
55.
HarrisonP. L.OaklandT. (2003). ABAS II: Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
56.
HathawayS.McKinleyJ. C. (1989). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2). Columbus, Ohio: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
57.
HayesJ. S.HaleD. B.GouvierW. M. (1997). Do tests predict malingering in defendants with mental retardation?Journal of Psychology, 131, 575–576.
58.
HiscockM.HiscockC. K. (1989). Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 5, 33–36.
59.
HonW. L. (March/April 2003). The Texas Prosecutor, 33, 19–21.
60.
HurleyK. E.DealW. P. (2006). Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: Potential problems and issues. Mental Retardation, 44, 112–119.
61.
InmanT. H.VickeryC. D.BerryD. T. R.LambD.EdwardsCSmithG. T. (1998). Development and initial validation of a new procedure for evaluating adequacy of effort given during neuropsychological testing: The Letter Memory Test. Psychological Assessment, 10. 128–139.
62.
JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ. A. (Eds.). (1996). Manual on diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
63.
KanayaT.ScullinM.CeciS. (2003). The Flynn effect and U.S. policies. American Psychologist, 58. 778–790.
64.
KaufmanA. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
65.
KaufmanA. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
66.
KaufmanA. S.LichtenbergerE. O. (1999). Essentials of WA1S-III Assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
67.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1993). Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
68.
KaufmanA.KaufmanN. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
69.
KelloggC. E.MortonN. W. (1978). The Revised Beta Examination (Beta II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
70.
KeyesD. W. (2004). Use of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) to identify malingering mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 42, 151–153.
71.
KeyesD. W.EdwardsW. J.DerningT. J. (1998). Mitigating mental retardation in capital cases: Finding the “invisible” defendant. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 22, 529–539.
72.
KeyesD. W.EdwardsW. J.PerskeR. (2002). People with mental retardation are dying, legally: At least 44 have been executed. Mental Retardation, 40, 243–244.
73.
Ledford v. Head, 2008 WL 754486 (N.D.Ga.)
74.
LindenhokerD.McCarronL. (1983). The Street Survival Skills Questionnaire. Dallas: McCarron-Dial Systems.
75.
LopezS.RomeroA. (1988). Assessing the intellectual functioning of Spanish-speaking adults: Comparison of the EIWA and the WAIS. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19. 263–270.
76.
MacvaughG. S.GrissoT. (2006). Assessment of mental retardation in death row inmates: A survey of professional practices. Paper presented in March, 2006 at the conference of the American Psychology-Law Society. St. Petersburg, FL.
77.
MelendezF. (1994). The Spanish version of the WAIS: Some ethical considerations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 388–393.
78.
MillerH. A. (2001). Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms test (M-FAST): Professional manual: Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
79.
MittenbergW.TherouxS.Aguila-PuentasG.BianchiniK. J.GreveK. W.RaylsK. (2001). Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—3rd Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 440–445.
80.
MooreR. B. (2006). Modification of individual's IQ scores is not accepted professional practice. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 11–12.
81.
MossmanD. (2003). Psychiatry in the courtroom. The Public Interest, 150, 22–37.
82.
NeisserU. (1998). The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83.
OaklandT.ZimmermanS. (1986). The course on individual mental assessment: A national survey of course instructors. Professional School Psychology, 1, 51–59.
84.
OlleyJ. G. (2006a). The assessment of adaptive behavior in adult forensic cases: Part 1. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2–4.
85.
OlleyJ. G. (2006b). The assessment of adaptive behavior in adult forensic cases: Part 2: The importance of adaptive behavior. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. 32, 7–8.
86.
OlleyJ. G. (2007). The assessment of adaptive behavior in adult forensic cases: Part 3: Sources of adaptive behavior information. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3–6.
87.
OlleyJ. G.GreenspanS.SwitzkyH. (2006). Division 33 ad hoc committee on mental retardation and the death penalty. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 11–13.
88.
OlveraD. R.DeverR. B.EarnestM. A. (2000). Mental retardation and sentences for murder: Comparison of two recent court cases. Mental Retardation, 38, 228–233.
89.
OrpenC. A. (2003). Following in the footsteps of Ford: Mental retardation and capital punishment post-Atkins. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 65, 83–102.
90.
Penry v. Lynaugh. 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
91.
People v. Vidal, 129 Cal. App. 4th 434 (2007).
92.
The Psychological Corporation. (1997). WA1S-III and WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio: TX, Author.
93.
ReyA. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
RogersR.BagbyR. M.DickensS. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
96.
SattlerJ. M. (1992). Assessment of children: WISC-lII and WPPSI-R supplement. San Diego, CA: Author.
97.
SchalockR. L. (1999). The merging of adaptive behavior and intelligence: Implications for the field of mental retardation. In SchalockR. L. (Ed.) Adaptive behavior and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation (pp. 43–59). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
98.
SchalockR. L.BuntinxW. H. E.Borthwick-DuffyS.LuckassonR.SnellM. E.TasséM. J.WehmeyerM. L. (2007). User's Guide Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 10th Edition. Applications for Clinicians, Educators, Disability Program Managers, and Policy Makers. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
99.
SchalockR. L.LuckassonR. L. (2005). Clinical judgment. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
100.
SchretlenD.ArkowitzH. (1990). A psychological test battery to detect prison inmates who fake insanity or mental retardation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 8, 75–84.
101.
ScullinM. H. (2006). Large state-level fluctuations in mental retardation classifications related to introduction of renormed intelligence test. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111(5), 322–335.
102.
SimeonssonR. J.ShortR. J. (1996). Adaptive development, survival roles, and quality of life. In JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ. A. (Eds.). Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation (pp. 137–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
103.
SimonM.J. (2007). Performance of mentally retarded forensic patients on the Test of Memory Malingering. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63, 339–344.
TeaS.A. (1999). WAIS-III: Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para Adultos. Tercera version [WA1S-III: Wechsler adult Intelligence scale. Third version]. Madrid: TEA.
107.
Texas Health & Safety Code § 591.003(13).
108.
TombaughT. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
109.
Walker v. True, 399 F.3d 315 (4th Cir. 2005).
110.
WechslerD. (1974). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
111.
WechslerD. (1991). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—III manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
WeissK. J.HaskinsB. H.HauserM. J. (2004). Commentary: Atkins and clinical practice. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32, 309–313.
116.
WidowsM. R.SmithG. P. (2005). Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
