ConnellM. A. (2003). A psychobiographical approach to the evaluation for sentence mitigation. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31, 319–354.
4.
CunninghamM. D. (2006). Informed consent in capital sentencing evaluations: Targets and content. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 452–459.
5.
CunninghamM. D. (2007). Forensic psychology evaluations at capital sentencing (pp. 211–238). In JacksonR. L. (Ed.), Learning forensic assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6.
CunninghamM. D.GoldsteinA. M. (2003). Sentencing determinations in death penalty cases (pp. 407–436). In GoldsteinA. (Ed.), Forensic psychology (vol. 11 of 12). WeinerI. (Ed.), Handbook of psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
CunninghamM. D.ReidyT. J. (2001). A matter of life or death: Special considerations and heightened practice standards in capital sentencing evaluations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 473–490.
8.
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
9.
Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
10.
Panetti v. Quarterman. 549 U.S. ___ (2007), 127 S. Ct. 2842 (2007).