A variety of theories are presented and discussed in relation to homicides committed by women, with particular reference to neonaticide, infanticide, and filicide. The role of men in these child homicides is shown to vary by age of the child as well as relationship of the male perpetrators to the child. The varying motives for child homicide are discussed as well by gender. For women, this includes possible syndromes from which they may suffer, although not all the syndromes are recognized in professional or legal sources. In addition, the legal ramifications affecting criminal charges and sentences imposed are discussed and shown to vary not only by state, but also by gender.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerJ. (2002). Criminology: “I loved Joe, but I had to shoot him: Homicide by women in the turn of the century Chicago.”Journal of Criminology and Crime, 92, 867–890
2.
AlwaysJ. (1995). The trouble with gender: Tales of the still-missing feminist revolution in sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 13, 209–222
3.
Andrea Pia Yates, Appellant v Texas (2005, January 6). In the Court of Appeals for First District of Texas, Nos.01-02-00462-CR 01-02-00463-CR
4.
Arcoren v. United States. 929 F.2d 1235 (1991).
5.
BaileyW.PetersonR. D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women: The case of murder. In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and Inequality (pp. 174–205). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
6.
BakerK. K. (2005). Gender and emotion in criminal law. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 28, 447–665
7.
BourgetD.GagnesP. (2002). Maternal filicide in Quabec. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Low, 35(1), 74–82
8.
BourgetD.GraceJ.WhitehurstL. (2007). A review of maternal and paternal filicide. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law, 35(1), 74–82
9.
ChanW. (2001). Women, Murder and Justice. New York, NY: Palgrave
10.
Chesney-LindM. (1989). Girls' crime and woman's place: Toward a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 5–29
11.
ClearyM. (2004–2005). Mothers under the microscope; Gender bias in law and medicine. Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practice and Clinical Law, 7, 184–249
12.
CollinsJ. M. (2007). “Lady Madonna, children at your feet”: The criminal justice system's romanticization of the parent-child relationship. Iowa Law Review, 93, 131–186
13.
ConnellM. (2002). Postpartum psychosis defense. Case Western Law Review, 53, 143–168
14.
CoontzS. (2005). Marriage: A history from obedience to intimacy or how love conquered marriage. New York, NY: Viking
15.
DalyM.WilsonL. M. (1994). Some differential attributes of lethal assault on small children by stepfathers versus genetic fathers. Etiology and Sociobiology, 15, 207–217
16.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), 125 L.Ed. 2d 469, 113 S.Ct. 2786
17.
DennoD. W. (1994). Gender, crime, and the criminal defenses. Northwestern University Law Review, 85, 80–91
18.
DvorakJ. (1998). Neonaticide: Less than murder?Illinois University Law Review, 19, 173–196
19.
EwingC. P. (1990). Psychological self-defense: A proposed justification for women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 579–594
20.
FazioC. A.ComitoJ. L. (1999) Rethinking the tough sentencing of teenage neonaticide offenders in the United States. Fordham Law Review, 67, 3109–3143
21.
FergusonE. E. (2007). Domestic violence by another name; crimes of passion in fin-de-siecle Paris. Journal of Women's History, 19(4), 12–34
22.
FernandezL. K. (Ed.) (2007). Eighth annual review of gender and sexuality law: Criminal law chapter: Battered Woman Syndrome. The Georgetown University Journal of Gender and Law, 8, 235–253
23.
FishM. J. (2008). An eye for an eye: Proportionality as a moral principle of punishment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28, 57–71
24.
Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46 (1923), 293 F. 1013
25.
GilliganC. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press
26.
HannaC. (2000). Bad girls and good sports: Some reflections on violent female juvenile delinquents, Title IX and the promise of girl power. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 27, 667–700
27.
HarrisG.HiltonN.RiceM.EkeA. (2007). Children killed by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 85–95
28.
HatcherG. R. (2003). The gendered nature of the battered woman syndrome: Why gender neutrality does not mean equality. New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 59, 21–46
29.
HuntA. (2006). Calculations and concealments: Infanticide in mid-nineteenth century Britain. Victorian Literature and Culture, 34, 71–94
30.
IsserN. K.SchwartzL. L. (2006). Shaken baby syndrome. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 34, 291–304
31.
JacobsenC.MizgaK.D'OrioL. (2007). Battered women, homicide convictions, and sentencing: The case for clemency. Hastings Women's Law Journal, 18, 31–65
32.
KaufmanW. R. P. (2007). Self-defense, imminence, and the battered woman. New Criminal Law Review, 10, 342–372
33.
KildayA-M.WatsonK. D. (2005). Child murder in Georgian England., History Today, 55(1), 40–47
34.
KinsportsK. (2004). Self-defense: Deconstructing the “image” of the battered woman: So much activity, so little change: A reply to the critics of battered women's self-defense. St. Louis University Public Law Review, 23, 155–187
35.
KramarK. J.WatsonW. D. (2006). The insanities of reproduction: Medico-legal knowledge and the development of infanticide law. Social Legal Studies, 15, 237–255
36.
MacfarlaneJ. (1998). Neonaticide and the “ethos of maternity”: Traditional criminal law defenses and the novel syndrome. Cardozo Women's Law Journal, 5, 175–248
37.
MackinnonC. T. (1987). Difference and dominance. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and the law (pp. 32–45). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
38.
ManchesterJ. (2003). Beyond accommodation: Reconstructing the insanity defense to provide an adequate remedy for postpartum psychotic women. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 93, 713–749
39.
MarchC. L. (2005–2006). The conflicted treatment of postpartum psychosis under criminal law. William Mitchell Law Review, 32, 243–264
40.
McSherryB. (1993). The return of the raging hormones theory: Premenstrual syndrome, postpartum disorders, and criminal responsibility. Sydney Law Review, 15, 292–316
41.
MeadowR. (1977). Munchausen syndrome by proxy: The hinterland of child abuse. Lancet, 2, 343–345
42.
NagelI. H.JohnsonB. (1994). The role of gender in a structural sentencing system: Equal treatment policy choices and the sentencing of female offenders under U. S. sentencing guidelines. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85, 181–222
43.
ObermanM. (1996) Mothers who kill: Coming to terms with modern American infanticide. American Criminal Law Review, 34, 1–110
44.
ObermanM. (2003). “Lady Madonna, children at your feet”; Tragedies at the intersection of motherhood, mental illness, and the law. William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 10, 33–67
45.
OttD. (2008, March 14). Xbox infant killing draws long jail term. The Philadelphia Inquirer, pp. B1, B7
46.
PaM. (2002). Towards a feminist theory of violence. University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 9, 45–79
47.
ParnessJ. A. (2007). Lost paternity in the culture of motherhood; a different view of safe haven laws. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 83–90
48.
PaulozzioL. J.SaltzmanL. E.ThompsonM. P.HolmgrenP. (1998) Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners, United States 1991–1998. Division of violence prevention, Office of Statistics and Programming. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 50, No. SS-3, 1–8
49.
People v. Barber, 13 AD 3rd 898, 900, 787 N.Y.S. 2d 424 (2004).
50.
People v. Riddle, 649 NW 2d 30 Mich. (2002).
51.
People v. Skeoch, 408 Ill. 276, 96 N.E. 2d 473 Ill. (1949).
52.
People v. Wernick, 89 NY 2d 111; 674 NE 2d 322 (1996); 651 NYS 2d 392
53.
RacineJ. R. (2005). A dangerous place for troubled young women: A call for the end to newborn safe haven laws in Wisconsin and beyond. Wisconsin Women's Law Journal, 20, 243–264
54.
RobertsJ. W. (2003). Between the heat of passion and cold blood: Battered Woman's Syndrome as an excuse for self-defense in non-confrontational homicides: Introduction. Law and Psychology Review, 27, 135–143
55.
SangerC. (2006). Infant safe haven laws; legislating in the culture of life. Columbia Law Review, 106, 753–834
56.
SavageJ. (2006). Criminal law chapter: Battered Woman Syndrome. Georgetown Journal of Gender and Law, 7, 761–771
57.
SchwartzL. L.IsserN. K. (2001). Neonaticide: An appropriate application for therapeutic jurisprudence?Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 703–718
58.
SchwartzL. L.IsserN. K. (2007). Child homicide. New York. NY: Taylor & Francis
59.
ScottJ. W. (1988). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference; or the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 33–50
60.
ShackelfordT. K. (2001). Partner-killings by women in cohabiting relationships and marital relationships. Homicide Studies, 5(3), 253–268
61.
SingletonL. C. (2007). After Andrea: Increased recognition of postpartum depression. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 9, 189–201
62.
SmitheyM. (1998). Victim/offender relationship and causes of death. Journal of Family Violence, 13(3), 285–297
63.
State v. Ciskie, 751 P.2d 1165 Wash. 1988
64.
State v. Frost, 577 A.2d 1282, N.J. Super 1990
65.
State v. Kelly, 478 A. 2d 364 N.J. 1984
66.
State Statutes (as cited in Westlaw), West's Annotated Cal. Evid. Code #1107, West's Florida Statutes Ann. #90.702, West's Code of Georgia Annotated #24-9-67\, Mass. General Laws annotated 233 #23F, New Jersey Evidence - N. J. R. E. #702
67.
SteelmanE. S. (2002) A question of revenge: Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and a proposed diminished capacity defense for homicidal mothers. Cardozo Women's Law Journal, 8, 261–310
68.
SteffensmeierD.AllanE. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 458–487
69.
StevensonB.WolfersJ. (2003). Bargaining in the shadow of the law. NBER Working paper series, Working paper 10175
70.
StiffmanM. N.SchnitzerP. G.AdamP.KruseR. L.EwigmanB. G. (2002). Household composition and risk of fatal child maltreatment. Pediatrics, 109, 615–621
WalkerL. E. (1977). Who are the battered women?Frontiers: A journal of women studies, 2, 52–57
73.
WalkerL. E. A. (2000). The Battered Woman Syndrome, 2nd ed.New York, NY: Springer Publishing
74.
WardJ. (2003). Confronting issues in criminal justice: Law enforcement and criminal offenders: Snapshots: Holistic images of female offenders in the criminal justice system. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30, 723–748
75.
WeissmanD. (2007). The personal is political and rethinking personal violence. Brigham Young Law Review, 387–438
76.
WestD. A.LichtensteinB. (2006). Andrea Yates and the criminalization of the filicidal maternal body. Feminist Criminology, 1, 173–187
77.
WilliamsW. (1992). The equality crisis. Women's Rights Law Reporter, 14, 151–174
78.
WillsA. D. (2004). Neonaticide: The necessity of syndrome evidence when safe haven legislation falls short. Temple Law Review, 77, 1001–1038
