Evaluations of sex offenders in the context of civil commitment occur both pre- and post-commitment. Pre-commitment evaluations must address the relevant prongs of the state's civil commitment statute including the presence of a mental disorder or abnormality, likelihood of future sexual violence, and the volitional link between the two. Post-commitment evaluations must assess treatment progress and readiness for release. A thorough understanding of assessment and diagnostic issues relating to sexual offender civil commitment are essential in conducting both pre- and post-commitment evaluations. The high stakes nature of sex offender civil commitment demands rigorous and empirically based evaluations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author
2.
AndersonR. D.GibeauD.D'AmoraD. A. (1995). The Sex Offender Treatment Rating Scale: Initial reliability data. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 221–227
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct(4th edition). Anderson Publishing
4.
Association for the Treatment of Sex Abusers (ATSA) (2001). Civil commitment of sexually violent predators. Position paper retrieved from http://www.atsa.com/ppcivilcommit.html
5.
BarbareeH. E. (2005). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and recidivism: An extended follow-up of Seto and Barbaree. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1115–1131
6.
BarbareeH. E.BlanchardR. (2008). Sexual deviance over the lifespan: Reductions in deviant sexual behavior in the aging sex offender. In LawsD.R.O'DonohueW.T. (Eds.), Sexual Deviance: Theory Assessment and Treatment (2nd edition).
7.
BarbareeH. E.LangtonC. M.BlanchardR. (2007). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the VRAG and SORAG: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6, 29–46
8.
BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C.LangtonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25,490–521
9.
BartoshD. L.GarbyT.LewisD.GrayS. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 4, 422–438
10.
BeckerJ. V.StinsonJ.TrompS.MesserG. (2003). Characteristics of individuals petitioned for civil commitment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 185–195
11.
BerlinF. S.GalbreathN. W.GearyB. (2003). The use of actuarial at civil commitment hearings to predict likelihood of future sexual violence. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 377–382
12.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC: The British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence
13.
BorumR.OttoR.GoldingS. (1993). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 21, 35–76
14.
CampbellT. W. (2003). Sex offenders and actuarial risk assessments: Ethical considerations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21. 269–279
15.
CampbellT. W. (2004). Assessing sex offenders: Problems and pitfalls. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, LTD.
16.
ClarkC.MezeyG. (1997). Elderly sex offenders against children: A descriptive study of child sex abusers over the age of 65. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 8, 357–369
17.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665
18.
ConroyM. A. (2003). Evaluations of sexual predators. In GoldsteinA.M. (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology: Forensic Psychology (pp. 463–484). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Inc
19.
CornellD. G.WarrenJ.HawkG.StaffordE.OramG.PineD. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 64, 783–790
20.
CraigL. A.BrowneK. D.StringerI. (2004). Limitations in actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: A methodological note. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 6, 16–32
21.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
22.
DemingA. (2008). Sex offender civil commitment programs: Current practices, characteristics, and resident demographics, The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 36, 000–000
23.
DorenD. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitment and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
24.
DorenD. M. (2006a). The model for considering release of civilly committed sexual offenders. In SchlankA. (Ed.), The Sexual Predator: Law and Public Policy Clinical Practice (pp. 6-1–6-19).
25.
DorenD. M. (2006b). What do we know about the effect of aging on recidivism risk for sexual offenders?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 137–157
26.
EppersonD. L.KaulJ.HuotS.GoldmanR.AlexanderW. (2003). Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised (MnSost-R): Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved from Iowa State Univeristy, Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu
27.
EssesV. M.WebsterC.D. (1988). Physical attractiveness, dangerousness, and the Canadian Criminal Code. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1017–1031
28.
FriendshipC.FalshawL.BeechA. R. (2003). Measuring the real impact of accredited offending behavior programmes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 115–127
29.
Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Circuit, 1923).
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136
37.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada
38.
HareR. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25–54
39.
HareR. D. (1999). Psychopathy as a risk factor for violence. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70, 181–197
40.
HareR. D. (2003). Manual for the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, 2nd edition. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems, Inc
41.
HareR. D. (2006). Psychopathy: A clinical and forensic overview. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29, 709–724
42.
HareR. D.ClarkH.D.GrannM.ThorntonD. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 623–645
43.
HareR. D.ForthA. E.StrachanK. E. (1992). Psychopathy and crime across the life span. In PetersR. DeV.McMahonR.J.QuinseyV.L. (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 285–300). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
44.
HareR. D.McPhersonL. M.ForthA. E. (1988). Male psychopaths and their criminal careers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 710–714
45.
HarpurT. J.HareR. D. (1994). Assessment of psychopathy as a function of age. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 604–609
46.
HarrisA. J. R. (2007, November). Dynamic supervision project outcomes: Risk assessment partnerships with multiple provinces and states. Presented at the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers Annual Conference, San Diego, CA
47.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2007). Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging or the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 297–313
48.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315–335
49.
HartS. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 121–137
50.
HartS. D. (2003). Actuarial risk assessment: Commentary on Berlin et al. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 383–388
51.
HartS. D.MichieC.CookeD. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the margins of error of group v. individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(Supplement 49), s60–s65
52.
HemphillJ. F.HareR. D. (1995). Psychopathy checklist factor scores and recidivism. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 24, 68–73
53.
HobermanH. M. (1999). Expert witness report and testimony in sexual preator devil commitment proceedings. In SchlankA. (Ed.), The sexual predator: Law, policy, evaluation, and treatment (pp. 11:1–11:57). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute
54.
HogueT. E. (1994). Goal attainment scaling: A measure of clinical impact and risk assessment. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 21, 96–102
55.
In re the Detention of Thorell, 72 P. 3d 708 (S. Ct. WA 2003).
56.
JacksonR. L.HessD. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 425–448
57.
JacksonR. L.RichardsH. J. (2007). Diagnostic and risk profiles among civilly committed sex offenders in Washington state. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 313–323
58.
JacksonR. L.RichardsH. J. (2008). Evaluations for the civil commitment of sexual offenders. In JacksonR.L. (Ed.). Learning Forensic Assessment (pp. 183–209). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis
59.
JacksonR. L.RogersR.ShumanD. W. (2004). The adequacy and accuracy of sexually violent predator evaluations: Contextualized risk assessment in clinical practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3, 115–129
60.
JanusE. S. (1998). Hendricks and the moral terrain of police power civil commitment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 297–322
61.
JanusE. S. (2000). Sexual predator commitment laws: Lessons for law and the behavioral sciences. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 5–21
62.
Kansas v. Crane. 534 U.S. 407 (2002).
63.
Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).
64.
KennedyH. G.GrubinD. H. (1992). Patterns of denial in sex offenders. Psychological Medicine, 22, 191–196
65.
KirschL. G.BeckerJ. V. (2007). Emotional deficits in psychopathy and sexual sadism: Implications for violent and sadistic behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 904–922
66.
KraemerH. C.KazdinA. E.OffordD. R.KesslerR. C.JensenP. S.KupferD. J. (1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337–343
67.
LacoursiereR. B. (2003). Evaluating offenders under a sexually violent predator law: The practical practice. In WinickB.J.La FondJ.Q. (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 75–97). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
68.
LangevinR. (1988). Defensiveness in sex offenders. In RogersR. (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 269–290). New York, NY: Guilford Press
69.
LangtonC. M.BarbareeH. E.HansenK. T. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Static-2002 among adult sexual offenders with reference to treatment status. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 616–640
70.
LangtonC. M.BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C. (2007). Actuarial assessment of risk for reoffense among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 37–59
71.
LawsD. R.HudsonS. M.WardT. (2000). The original model of relapse prevention with sex offenders: Promises unfulfilled. In LawsD.R.HudsonS.M.WardT. (Eds.). Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 3–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
72.
LevensonJ. S.MacGowanM. J. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 49–63
73.
LynettE.RogersR. (2000). Emotions overriding forensic opinions? The potentially biasing effects of victim statements. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 28, 457
74.
McGrathR. J.LivingstonJ.CummingG. F. (2002). Development of a treatment needs and progress scale for adult sex offender. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
75.
MercadoC. C.SchoppR. F.BornsteinB. H. (2005). Evaluating sex offenders under sexually violent predator laws: How might mental health professionals conceptualize the notion of volitional impairment?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 289–309
76.
MillerH. A.AmentaA. E.ConroyM. A. (2005). Sexually Violent Predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 29–54
77.
MonahanJ.SteadmanH. J.SilverE.AppelbaumP. S.RobbinsP. C.MulveyE. P. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York. NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
78.
MorseS. J. (1998). Fear of danger, flight from culpability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 250–267
79.
MorseS. J. (2003). Bad or mad? Sex offenders and social control. In WinickB.J.La FondJ.Q. (Eds.) Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 165–182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
80.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329
81.
PorterS.BirtA. R.BoerD. P. (2001). Investigation of the criminal and conditional release profiles of Canadian federal offenders as a function of psychopathy and age. Law and Human Behavior, 25. 647–661
82.
PorterS.FairweatherD.DruggeJ.HuguesH.BirtA.BoerD. P. (2000). Profiles of psychopathy in incarcerated sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27. 216–233
83.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C.NorcrossJ. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1114
84.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
85.
ReidyD. E.ZeichnerA.MillerJ. D. (2007). Psychopathy and aggression: Examining the role of psychopathy factors in predicting laboratory aggression under hostile and instrumental conditions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1244–1251
86.
RiceM. E. (June, 2007). Current status of violence risk assessment: Is there a role for clinical judgment? Presented at the North American Correctional and Criminal Justice Psychology Conference, Ottawa, ON
87.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the violence risk appraisal guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231–241
88.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T.CormierC. A. (1992). Evaluation of a maximum security therapeutic community for psychopaths and other mentally disordered offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 16. 399–412
89.
RobertsA. D.CoidJ. W. (2007). Psychopathy and offender behavior: Findings from the national survey of prisoners in England and Wales. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 18, 23–43
90.
RobertsC. F.DorenD. M.ThorntonD. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 569–589
91.
RogersR. (2001). Handbook of Diagnostic and Structured Interviewing. New York, NY: Guilford Press
92.
RogersR.DickeyR. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders: A review of competing models of deception. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 49–63
93.
RogersR.JacksonR. L. (2005). Sexually Violent Predators: The risky enterprise of risk assessment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 523–528
94.
SalekinR. T. (2002). Psychopathy and therapeutic pessimism: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 79–112
95.
SalekinR. T.RogersR.SewellK. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203–215
96.
SchoppR. F. (1998). Civil commitment and sexual predators: Competence and condemnation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 323–376
97.
SchoppR. F.SturgisB. J. (1995). Sexual predators and legal mental illness for civil commitment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13, 437–458
98.
SerinR. C. (1996). Violent recidivism in criminal psychopaths. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 207–217
99.
SetoM. C. (2005). Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 156–167
100.
SetoM. C.BarbareeH. E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1235–1249
101.
SewellK. W.SalekinR. T. (1997). Understanding and detecting dissimulation in sex offenders. In RogersR. (Ed.). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd edition, pp. 328–350). New York, NY: Guilford Press
102.
SjostedtG.LangstromN. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: Cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 629–645
103.
SreenivasanS.KirkishP.GarrickT.WeinbergerL. E.PhenixA. (2000). Actuarial risk assessment models: A review of critical issues related to violence and sex-offender recidivism assessments. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 438–448
104.
TristanL. (2006). Psychopathy factors and degree of forcefulness in sex-offenders: Implications for current risk assessment practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
105.
VessJ.MurphyC.ArkowitzS. (2004). Clinical and demographic differences between sexually violent predators and other commitment types in a state forensic hospital. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 15. 669–681
106.
VitaccoM. J.NeumannC. S.JacksonR. L. (2005). Testing a four-factor model of psychopathy and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476
107.
WebsterC. D.DouglasK. S.EavesD.HartS. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University
108.
WinickB. J.La FondJ. Q. (Eds.) (2003). Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
109.
WittP. H.BaroneN. M. (2007). Assessing readiness for release with SVP civil commitment cases. Sex Offender Law Report, 8, 1, 13–15
110.
WongS.HareR. D. (2005). Guidelines for a psychopathy treatment program. Toronto, ON: Multi-Heath Systems, Inc.
111.
WongS.OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.GordonA. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan
