American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (2005). Ethics guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Bloomfield, CT: Author
2.
American Medical Association (1998). AMA policy compendium. Washington, DC: Author
3.
American Medical Association (2006). The principles of medical ethics with annotations especially applicable to psychiatry. Washington, DC: Author
4.
American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073
5.
BoccacciniM. T.BrodskyS. L. (2002). Believability of expert and lay witnesses: Implications for trial consultation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 384–388
6.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665
7.
CrownB. M.FingerhutH. S.LowenthalS. J. (2003). Conflicts of interest and other pitfalls for the expert witness. In HortonA. M.Jr.HartlageL. C. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic neuropsychology (pp. 383–421). New York, NY: Springer
8.
DroginE. Y. (in press). Expert qualifications and credibility. In FaustD. (Ed.), Ziskin's coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony(6th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
9.
DroginE. Y. (2004). Jurisprudent therapy and competency. Law and Psychology Review, 28, 41–51
10.
DroginE. Y. (1999). Prophets in another land: Utilizing psychological expertise from foreign jurisdictions. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 23, 767–771
11.
EisnerD. A. (1985). The forensic psychologist as expert witness: Satisfying requirements for qualifications, psychological evaluation and opinions. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 19–27
12.
MeltonG. B.PetrilaP.PoythressN. G.SloboginC.LyonsP. M.OttoR. K. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers(3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford
13.
MossmanD.KappM. B. (1998). “Courtroom whores”—or why do attorney call us?: Findings from a survey on attorneys' use of mental health experts. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26, 27–36
14.
ParryJ. W.DroginE. Y. (2007). Mental disability law, evidence and testimony: A comprehensive reference manual for lawyers, judges and mental disability professionals. Washington, DC: American Bar Association
15.
ReidW. H. (2000). Licensure requirements for out-of-state forensic examinations. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 433–437
16.
ReidW. H.DurgamS. (2007). Jury bias and psychiatric experts: Judges' impressions of international medical graduates as expert witnesses. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 13, 190–194
17.
ShumanD. W.CunninghamM. D.ConnellM. A.ReidW. H. (2003). Interstate forensic psychology consultations: A call for reform and proposal of a model rule. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 233–239
18.
SimonR. I.GutheilT. G. (2003). The forensic expert on the road: New hazards along the way. Psychiatric Annals, 33, 302–306
19.
SimonR. I.ShumanD. W. (1999). Conducting forensic examinations on the road: Are you practicing your profession without a license?Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 75–82
20.
TucilloJ. A.DeFilippisN. A.DenneyR. L.DsurneyJ. (2002). Licensure requirements for interjurisdictional forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 377–383
21.
YantzC. L.BauerL. B.McCaffreyR. J. (2006). Regulations governing the out-of-state practice of psychology: Implications for forensic neuropsychologists. Applied Neuropsychology, 13, 19–27