DeClueG. (2003). Toward a two-stage model for assessing adjudicative competence. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31, 305–317
2.
DeClueG. (2005a). Interrogations and disputed confessions: A manual for forensic psychological practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press
3.
DeClueG. (2005b). Psychological consultation in cases involving interrogations and confessions, Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 33, 313–366
4.
FuleroS. M. (2004). Expert psychological testimony on the psychology of interrogations and confessions. In LassiterG. D. (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 247–263). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum
5.
GrissoT. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments, Second edition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum
6.
Godinez v. Moran, 1993, 509 U.S. 389
7.
GudjonssonG. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. West Sussex, England: Wiley
8.
HobsonC. L. (1999). Does the right of self-representation under Faretta v. California extend to the first appeal as of right?Amicus Brief from Criminal Legal Justice Foundation. Retrieved 2/6/06 from http://www.cjlf.org/briefs/MtnzS4.htm.
9.
KassinS. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk?American Psychologist, 60, 215–228
10.
KassinS. M.GudjonssonG. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and the issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2), 33–67
11.
LeoR. A.OfsheR. J. (2001). The truth about false confessions and advocacy scholarship. Criminal Law Bulletin, 37(4), 293–370
12.
MeltonG. B.PetrilaJ.PoythressN. G.SloboginC. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts, 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford
PoythressN.BonnieR. J.MonahanJ.OttoR.HogeS. K. (2002). Adjudicative competence: The MacArthur studies. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum
16.
Visage v. State, 679 So.2d 735 (Fla. 1996).
17.
ViljoenJ. L.KlaverJ.RoeschR. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 251–211
18.
ViljoenJ. L.RoeschR.ZapfP. A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between competency to stand trial, competency to waive interrogation rights, and psychopathology. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 481–506
19.
ViljoenJ. L.RoeschR. (2005). Competence to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 723–742
20.
ViljoenJ. L.VincentG. M.RoeschR. (2006). Assessing adolescent defendants' adjudicative competence: Interrater reliability and factor structure of the Fitness Interview Test-Revised. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 467–487
21.
ZapfP. A.RoeschR. (2001). A comparison of the MacCAT-CA and the FIT for making determinations of competency to stand trial. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 81–92
22.
ZapfP. A.RoeschR.ViljoenJ. L. (2001). Assessing fitness to stand trial: The utility of the Fitness Interview Test (Revised Edition). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 426–431