The rationale for this article is to comprehensively outline and describe the strengths and weaknesses of various risk assessment instruments/tools relevant to the evaluation of sexually violent and violent offenders. The author will briefly discuss ethical obligations the forensic mental health professional (FMHP) must consider when conducting risk assessments.
AmentaA.GuyL.EdensJ. (2003). Sex Offender Risk Assessment: A Cautionary Note Regarding Measures Attempting to Quantify Violence Risk. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3(1), 39–50
2.
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (2005). Ethical Guidelines for the Practice of Forensic Psychiatry. Available at www.aapl.org/
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association. National Counsel on Measurement Education (1999). Standards for educational psychological testing. Washington, DC
4.
American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611
5.
American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, D.C.
6.
BarbareeH.E.SetoM.C. (1998, April). Empirical evaluation of the WSBC Multifactorial Assessment of Sex Offender Risk for Re-offense. 2nd Annual Research Day, Forensic Psychiatric Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto
7.
BarbareeH.E.SetoM.C.LangtonCM.PeackockE.J. (2001). Evaluating The Predictive Accuracy of Six Risk Assessment Instruments For Adult Sex Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4) 490–521
8.
BarryC.T.FrickP.J.DeShazoT.M.McCoyM.G.EllisM.LoneyB.R. (2000). The importance of callous-unemotional traits for extending the concept of psychopathy to children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 335–340
9.
BartoshD.L.GarbyT.LewisD.GrayS. (2003). Differences in the Predictive Validity of Actuarial Risk Assessments in Relation to Sex Offender Type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(4), 422–438
10.
BeechA.FriendshipC.EriksonM.HansonR.K. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of U.K. child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 155–168
11.
BèlangerN.EarlsC. (1996). Sex offender recidivism prediction. Forum on Correctional Research, 8, 22–24
12.
BerlinF.S.GalbreathN.W.GearyG.McGloneG. (2003). The Use of Actuarials at Civil Commitment Hearings to Predict the Likelihood of Future Sexual Violence. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Vol. 15(4), 377–382
13.
BjørklyS. (2002). Psychotic symptoms and violence towards others—a literature review of some preliminary findings: Part I. Delusions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(6), 605–615
14.
BoerD.P.HartS.D.KroppP.R.WebsterC.D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Professional Guidelines for Assessing Risk of Sexual Violence. The Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute Simon Fraser University
15.
BontaJ.HansonR. K.LawM. (1998). The Prediction of Criminal and Violent Recidivism Among Mentally Disordered Offenders: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142
16.
BorumR. (1996). Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training. American Psychologist, 51, 945–956
17.
CampbellT.W. (2000). Sexual Predator Evaluations and Phrenology: Considering Issues of Evidentiary Reliability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 111–130
18.
CampbellT.W. (2003). Sex Offenders and Actuarial Risk Assessments: Ethical Considerations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 270–279
19.
CampbellT.W. (2004). Assessing Sex Offenders: Problems and Pitfalls. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, LTD.Springfield, IL
20.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655–665
21.
CookeD.ForthA.HareR.D. (Eds.) (1998). Psychopathy, Theory, research, and implications for society. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer
22.
CookeD.J.MichieC. (2001). Refining the Construct of Psychopathy: Towards a Hierarchical Model, Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 171–188
23.
CornellD.WarrenJ.HawkG.StaffordE.OramG.PineD. (1996). Psychopathy in Instrumental and Reactive Violent Offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(4), 783–790
24.
DahlA.A. (1998). Psychopathy and psychiatric comorbidity. In MillonT.SimonsonE.Birket-SmithM.DavisR. D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, Criminal, and Violent Behavior (pp. 291–303). New York: Guilford Press
25.
DawesR.FaustD.MeehlP. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243. 1668–1674
26.
DeClueG. (2002). Avoiding Garbage in Sex Offender Re-Offense Risk Assessment: A Case Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(2) 73–91
27.
DempsterR. (1999, September). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Paper presented at the 18th annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, FL
28.
DempsterR.HartS.D. (2002). The Relative Utility of Fixed Variable Risk Factors in Discriminating Sexual Recidivists and Nonrecidivists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 121–138
29.
de VogelV.de RuiterC. (2005). The HCR-20 in Personality Disordered Female Offenders: A Comparison with a Matched Sample of Males. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 226–240
30.
de Vogelde RuiterC.HildebrandM.BosB.van de VenP. (2004). Type of Discharge and Risk of Recidivism Measured by the HCR-20: A Retrospective Study in a Dutch Sample of Treated Forensic Psychiatric Patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3(2), 149–165
31.
de VogelV.de RuiterC.van BeekD.MeadG. (2004). Predictive Validity of the SVR-20 and Static 99 in a Dutch Sample of Treated Sex Offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 235–251
32.
DorenD.M. (2000, November). Being accurate about the accuracy of the commonly used risk assessment instruments. Paper presented at the 19th annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, CA
33.
DorenD.M. (2002). Evaluating Sex Offenders. A Manual for Civil Commitments and Beyond. Thousand Oaks: CA
34.
DorenD.M.DowE.A. (2003). Commentary: What “Shrinkage” of the MnSOST-R? A Response to Wollert. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2(4), 49–64
35.
DorenD.M.RobertsC.F. (1998, October). The proper use and interpretation of actuarial instruments in assessing recidivism risk. Paper presented at the 17th annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, British Columbia
36.
DouglasK.S.OgloffJ.P. (2003). Multiple Facts of Risk for Violence: The Impact of Judgmental Specificity on Structured Decisions About Violence Risk. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(1), 19–34
37.
DouglasK.S.OgloffJ.P.HartS. (2003). Evaluation of a Model of Violence Risk Assessment Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1372–1379. June. Personality disorders and violence in civil psychiatric patients. Paper presented at the 5th International Congress on the Disorders of Personality, Vancouver, British Columbia
38.
DouglasK.S.OgloffJ.R.P.NichollsT.L.GrantI. (1999). Assessing Risk for Violence Among Psychiatric Patients: The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 917–930
39.
DouglasK.S.SkeemJ.L. (2005). Violence Risk Assessment: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(3), 347–383
40.
DouglasK.S.WebsterC.D. (1999). The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme. Concurrent Validity in a Sample of Incarcerated Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(1), 3–19
41.
DouglasK.S.YeomansM.BoerD.P. (2005). Comparative Validity Analysis of Multiple Measures of Violence Risk in a Sample of Criminal Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(5), 479–510
42.
DoyleM.DolanM. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Combining actuarial and clinical information to structure clinical judgments for the formulation and management of risk. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9, 649–657
43.
DoyleM.DolanM.McGovernJ. (2002). The validity of North American risk assessment tools in predicting in-patient violent behavior in England. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7(2), 141–154
44.
EdensJ.PoythressN.LilienfeldS.O. (1999). Identifying inmates at risk for disciplinary infractions: A comparison of two measures of psychopathy. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 435–443
45.
EdensJ.F.SkeemJ.L.DouglasK.S. (2006). Incremental Validity Analyses of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version in a Civil Psychiatric Sample. Assessment, 13(3), 368–374
46.
EppersonD.KaulJHuotS.GoldmanR.AlexanderW. (2003). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved from Iowa State University, Department of Psychology retrieved at: http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/faculty/epperson/TechUpdatePaper12-03.pdf
47.
FabianJ.M. (2003). Kansas v. Hendricks, Crane, and Beyond: “Mental Abnormality,” and “Sexual Dangerousness”: Volitional vs. Emotional Abnormality and the Debate Between Community Safety and Civil Liberties, William Mitchell Law Review, 29(4).
48.
FabianJ.M. (2005). The Risky Business of Conducting Risk Assessments for Those Already Civilly Committed as Sexually Violent Predators. William Mitchell Law Review, 32(1).
49.
FirestoneP.BradfordJ.M.GreenbergD.NunesK.L.BroomI. (1999, September). A comparison of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAC) and the Static 99. Presentation at the 18th annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, FL
50.
FischerD. (2000). Sex offender risk assessment validation study. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from the Arizona Department of Corrections. 1601 West Jefferson St., Phoenix, AZ 85007–3056).
51.
ForthA.E.HartS.D.HareR.D. (1990). Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 342–344
52.
FreemanD. (2001). Debate Forum: Does the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Have a Role In Violence Risk And Threat Assessment?Journal of Threat Assessment, 1(4), 53–66
53.
FujiiD.E.TokiokaA.B.LichtonA.I.HishinumaE. (2005). Ethnic Differences in Prediction of Violence Risk with the HCR-20 Among Psychiatric Inpatients. Psychiatric Services, 56, 711–716
54.
GaconoC.B.BodholtR.H. (2001). The Role of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in Violence Risk and Threat Assessment. Journal of Threat Assessment, 1(4), 67–81
55.
GaconoC.B. (2000). The Clinical and Forensic Assessment of Psychopathy. A Practitioner's Guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
56.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575–607
57.
GloverA.J.J.NicholsonD.E.HemmatiT.BernfeldG.A.QuinseyV.L. (2002). A comparison of predictors of general and violent recidivism among high risk Federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 235–249
58.
GottfreddsonS.D.MoriartyL.J. (2006). Statistical Risk Assessment: Old Problems and New Applications. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 178–200
59.
GrannM.BelfrageH.TengströmA. (2000). Actuarial Assessment of Risk For Violence. Predictive Validity of the VRAG and the Historical Part of the HCR-20. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 97–114
60.
GrayN.HillC.McGleishA.TimmonsD.MacCullochM.SnowdenR. (2003). Prediction of Violence and Self-Harm in Mentally Disordered Offenders. A Prospective Study of the Efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and Psychiatric Symptomatology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 443–451
61.
GloverA.J.HemmatiT.BernfeldG.A.QuinseyV.L. (2002). A Comparison of Predictors of General and Violent Recidivism Among High-Risk Federal Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(3), 235–249
62.
GroveW.MeehlP. (1996). Comparative Efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323
63.
GroveW.ZaldD.BoydS.SnitzB.NelsonC. (2000). Clinical Versus Mechanical Prediction: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30
64.
GrubinD. (1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Police Research Series Paper 99. London: Home Office
65.
HanlonM.LarsonS.ZacherS. (1999). The Minnesota SOST and sexual re-offending in North Dakota: A retrospective study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 71–77
66.
HansonR.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved at: www.sgc.gc.ca.
67.
HansonR.K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1/2), 50–72
HansonR.K.BussiereM. (1998). Predictors of sexual recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362
70.
HansonR.K.HarrisA. (1998). Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Recidivism (User Report No. 1998-01). Ottawa, Ontario, Solicitor General Canada
71.
HansonR.K.HarrisA. (2000). Where Should We Intervene? Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Offense Recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6–35
72.
HansonR.K.ThortonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136
73.
HareR.D. (1996). Psychopathy. A Clinical Construct Whose Time Has Come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1).
74.
HareR.D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 99–119
75.
HareR.D. (1999). Psychopathy As A Risk Factor For Violence. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70(3).
76.
HareR.D.ClarkD.GrannM.ThortonD. (2000). Psychopathy and the Predictive Validity of the PCL-R: An International Perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(5), 623–645
77.
HareR.D. (2004). Hare PCL-R, 2nd Edition. Technical Manual. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
78.
HareR.D.ForthA.D. (2006). Assessing Psychopathy: Clinical and Forensic Applications of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist Measures (PCL-R, PCL:YV, & PCL:SV). Seminar sponsored by Darkstone Research Group, The Minnesota Chapter of ATSA, and the Minnesota Department of Corrections. February 15–16, 2006, St. Paul, Minnesota
79.
HarpurT.J.HareR.D. (1994). Assessment of Psychopathy as a Function of Age. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(4), 604–609
80.
HarrisG.T.RiceM.E. (2003). Actuarial Assessment of Risk Among Sex Offenders. In PrentkyR.A.JanusE.S.SetoM.C. (Eds.), Sexually Coercive Behavior. Understanding and Management. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 989
81.
HarrisG.T.RiceM.E.CormierC.A. (1991). Psychopathy and Violent Recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 15(6). 625–637
82.
HarrisG.T.RiceM.E.CormierC.A. (2002). Prospective Replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in Predicting Violent Recidivism Among Forensic Psychiatric Patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26(4), 377–394
83.
HarrisG.T.RiceM.E.LalumiereM.L.QuinseyV.L.BoerD.P.LangC. (2003). A Multisite Comparison of Actuarial Risk Instruments for Sex Offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 413–425
84.
HarrisG.T.RiceM.E.QuinseyV.L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315–335
85.
HarrisG.T.SkillingT.RiceM.E. (2001). The Construct of Psychopathy. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 28, (pp. 197–264). University of Chicago
86.
HarrisJ.R.HansonR.K. (2001). A Structured Approach to Evaluating Change Among Sexual Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Jurnal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 105–122
87.
HartS.D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(1), 21–137
88.
HeilbrunK. (1997). Prediction Versus Management Models Relevant to Risk Assessment: The Importance of Legal Decision-Making Context. Law and Human Behavior, 21(4), 347–359
89.
HeilbrunK.O'NeillM.L.StevensT.StrohmanL.K.BowmanQ.LoY. (2004). Assessing Normative Approaches to Communicating Violence Risk. A National Survey of Psychologists. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 187–196
90.
HemphillJ.F.HareR.D.HartS.D. (1994). Psychopathy and substance use. Journal of Personality Disorders, 8, 169–180
91.
HemphillJ.F.HareR.D.WongS. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139–170
92.
HemphillJ.F.HartS.D. (2003). Forensic and Clinical Issues in the Assessment of Psychopathy. In GoldsteinA.WeinerI.B. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 11, Forensic Psychology, (pp. 87–107). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
93.
HowardR. (1990). Psychopathy Checklist Scores in Mentally Abnormal Offenders: A Re-examination, Personality and Individual Differences, 11(10), 1087–1091
94.
HowardR.BaileyR.NewmanA. (1984). A Preliminary Study of Hare's Research Scale for the Assessment of Psychopathy in Mentally-Abnormal Offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 389–396
95.
HughesG.HogueT.HollinC.ChampionH. (1997). First stage evaluation of a treatment program for personality disordered offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 8, 515–527
96.
JanusE.S.PrentkyR.A. (2003). Forensic Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment with Sex Offenders: Accuracy, Admissibility and Accountability. American Criminal Law Review, 40(4).
97.
KronerD.MillsJ. (2001). The Accuracy of Five Risk Appraisal Instruments in Predicting Institutional Misconduct and New Convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 471–489
98.
KronerD.MillsJ.ReddonJ. (2005). A Coffee Can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: The structure of criminal risk. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 360–374
99.
LaFondJ.Q. (2005). Preventing Sexual Violence. How Society Should Cope with sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
100.
LevensonM.R. (1992). Rethinking Psychopathy. Theory & Research, 2(1), 51–71
101.
LilienfeldS.O. (1994). Conceptual problems in the assessment of psychopathy. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 17–38
102.
LinkB.G.StueveA. (1994). Psychotic Symptoms and the Violent/Illegal Behavior of Mental Patients Compared to Community Controls. In Violence and Mental Disorder. Developments in Risk Assessment. MonahanJ.SteadmanH.J. (Eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press
103.
LitwackT.R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessments of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409–443
104.
LitwackT.R.SchlesingerL.B. (1999). Dangerousness Risk Assessments: Research, Legal, and Clinical Considerations. HessA.K.WeinerI.B. (Eds.) The Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 2nd Ed. (p. 182). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
105.
LloydM.D.GroveW.M. (2002, March 23). The usefulness of the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) in commitment decisions. Unpublished manuscript
106.
LozaW.DhaliwalG. (1997). Psychometric evaluation of the risk appraisal guide (rag). A tool for assessing violent recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 779–793
107.
LozaW.VilleneuveD.Loza-FamousA. (2002). Predictive Validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide: A tool for assessing violent offender's recidivism. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25, 85–92
108.
McDermottP.A.RutherfordM.J.AltermanA.I.CacciolaJ.S.NewmanJ.P. (2000). Generality of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Factors Over Prisoners and Substance-Dependent Patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 181–186
109.
McNeilD.E.GregoryA.L.LamJ.N.BinderR.L.SullivanG.R. (2003). Utility of Decision Support Tools for Assessing Acute Risk of Violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 945–953
110.
MeloyJ.R. (2000). Violence Risk and Threat Assessment. A Practical Guide to Mental Health and Criminal Justice. San Diego, CA: Specialized Training Services
111.
MeltonG.B.PetrilaJ.PoythressN.G.SloboginC. (1997). Psychological Evaluations for the Courts. A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers(2nd Ed.)New York: Guilford Press
112.
MillonT.SimonsenE.Birket-SmithM.DavisR.D. (1998). Psychopathy: Antisocial, Criminal, and Violent Behavior. New York: Guilford Press
113.
MillsJ.F.KronerD.G.HemmatiT. (2003). Predicting violent behavior through a static/stable variable lens. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 891–904
114.
MillsJ.F.JonesM.N.KronerD.G. (2005). An Examination of the Generalizability of the LSI-R and VRAG Probability Bins. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(5), 565–585
115.
Minn. Stat. 253B Subd. 17
116.
Minn. Stat. 253B Subd. 18b
117.
Minn. Stat. 253B Subd. 18c
118.
MonahanJ. (1981). Predicting Violent Behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Library of Social Research
119.
MonahanJ. (1996). Violence Prediction. The Past Twenty and the Next Twenty Years. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 107–120
120.
MonahanJ.SteadmanH. (Eds.). (1994). Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
121.
MonahanJ.SteadmanH. (1996). Violent storms and violent people: How meteorology can inform risk communication in mental health law. American Psychologist, 51, 931–938
122.
MonahanJ. (2000). Violence risk assessment: Scientific validity and evidentiary reliability. Washington and Lee Law Review, 57, 901–918
123.
MonahanJ.SteadmanH.J.SilverE.ApplebaumP.S.RobbinsP.C.MulveyE.P.RothL.GrissoT.BanksS. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press
124.
MorseS.J. (1998). Fear of Danger, Flight From Culpability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 250–267
125.
MossmanDouglas. (1994). Assessing Predictions of Violence: Being Accurate About Accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 783–792
126.
NichollsT.L.OgloffJ.DouglasK.S. (2004). Assessing Risk for Violence Among Male and Female Civil Psychiatric Patients: The HCR-20, PCL:SV, and VSC. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 127–158
127.
NunesK.L.FirestoneP.BradfordJ.M.GreenbergD.M.BroomI. (2002). A Comparison of Modified Versions of the Static 99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(3), 253–269
128.
O.R.S. 426.005
129.
O.R.S. 426.130
130.
O.R.S. 426.510
131.
OttoR. (1994). On the Ability of Mental Health Professionals to “Predict Dangerousness”: A Commentary on Interpretations of the “Dangerousness” Literature. Law and Psychology Review, 43, 63
132.
OttoR.K.PetrilaJ. (2002). Admissibility of Testimony Based on Actuarial Scales in Sex Offender Commitments: A Reply to Doren, 3, Sex Offender Law Report, 1, 15
133.
PatrickC. (2005). Handbook of Psychopathy. New York: Guilford Publications
134.
PorterS.FairweatherD.DruggeJ.HervèH.BirtA.BoerD.P. (2000). Profiles of psychopathy in incarcerated sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 216–233
135.
PrentkyR.A.JanusE.S.SetoM.C. (2003). Sexually Coercive Behavior. Understanding and Management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989
136.
QuackenbushR. (2000). The assessment of sex offenders in Ireland and the Irish Sex Offender Risk Tool. Unpublished manuscript, Granada Institute, Dublin, Ireland
137.
QuinseyV.L.ColemanG.JonesB.AltrowsI. (1997). Proximal antecedents of eloping and re-offending among mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 794–813
138.
QuinseyV.L.HarrisG.T.RiceM.E.CormierC.A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
139.
QuinseyV.L.RiceM.E.HarrisG.T. (1995). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(1), 85–105
140.
RiceM.E.HarrisG.T.QuinseyV.L. (1990). A Follow-Up of Rapists Assessed in a Maximum-Security Psychiatric Facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(4), 435–448
141.
RiceM.E.HarrisG.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737–748
142.
RiceM.E.HarrisG.T. (1997). Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231–241
143.
RobertsC.DorenD.M.ThortonD. (2002). Dimensions Associated With Assessments Of Sex Offender Recidivism Risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 569–589
144.
RutherfordM.CacciolaJ.AltermanA.McKayJ.CookT. (1999). The 2-Year Test-Retest Reliability Of The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised In Methadone Patients. Assessment, 6(3), 285–291
145.
SalekinR.RogersR.SewellK. (1996). A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive Validity of Dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203–215
146.
SerinR. (1991). Psychopathy and Violence in Criminals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence6(4), 423–431
147.
SerinR.AmosN. (1995). The Role of Psychopathy in the Assessment of Dangerousness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18(2), 231–238
148.
SerinR.MaillouxD.MalcolmP. (2001). Psychopathy, Deviant Sexual Arousal, and Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(3), 234–246
149.
SerinR.MalcolmP.KhannaA.BarbareeH. (1994). Psychopathy and Deviant Sexual Arousal in Incarcerated Sexual Offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(1), 3–11
150.
SerinR.PetersR.BarbareeH. (1990). Predictors of psychopathy and release outcome in a criminal population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 419–422
151.
SetoM.C. (2005). Is More Better? Combining Actuarial Risk Scales to Predict Recidivism Among Adult Sex Offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 156–167
152.
SetoM.C.LalumiereM.L. (2000). Psychopathy and sexual aggression. In GaconoC. (Ed.), The Clinical and Forensic Assessment of Psychopathy: A Practitioner's Guide (pp. 333–350). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
153.
SjöstedtG.GrannM. (2002). Risk Assessment: What is being predicted by actuarial prediction instruments?International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 179–183
154.
SjöstedtG.LångströmN. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross validation of the RRASOR and Static 99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 629–645
155.
SjöstedtG.LångströmN. (2002). Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists in Sweden: A comparison of different procedures. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 8, 25–40
156.
SkeemJ.L.EdensJ.F.CampJ.ColwellL.H. (2004). Are There Ethnic Differences in Levels of Psychopathy? A Meta-Analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5), 505–527
157.
SkeemJ.MulveyE.P. (2002). Monitoring the violence potential of mentally disordered offenders being treated in the community. In BuchananA. (Ed.), Care of the Mentally disordered offender in the community (pp. 111–142). New York: Oxford Press
158.
SteadmanH.J.SilverE.MonahanJ.ApplebaumP.S.RobinsP.C.MulveyE.P.GrissoT.RothL.H.BanksS. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83–100
159.
StrandS.BelfrageH.FranssonG.LevanderS. (1999). Clinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders: More important than actuarial data?Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 67–76
160.
SwansonJ.W. (1994). Mental disorder, substance abuse, and community violence: An epidemiological approach. In MonahanJ.SteadmanH. J. (Eds.), Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments in Risk Assessment (pp. 101–136). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
161.
SwartzM.S.SwansonJ.W.HidayV.A.BorumR.WagnerR.H.BurnsB.J. (1998). Violence and severe mental illness: The effects of substance abuse and nonadherence to medication. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 226–231
162.
TengströmA. (2001). Long-term predictive validity of historical factors in two risk assessment instruments in a sample of violent offenders with schizophrenia. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 55(4) 243–249
163.
TengströmA.HodginsS.GrannM.LångströmN.KullgrenG. (2004). Schizophrenia and Criminal Offending. The Role of Psychopathy and Substance Use Disorders. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 31(4), 367–391
164.
ThortonD. (2002). Constructing and Testing a Framework for Dynamic Risk Assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal for Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–153
165.
WaltersG.D. (2004). The Trouble with Psychopathy as a General Theory of Crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 133–148
166.
WarrenJ.I.SouthS.C.BurnetteM.L.RogersL.FriendR.BaleR.Van PattenI. (2005). Understanding the risk factors for violence and criminality in women: The concurrent validity of the PCL-R and HCR-20. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 269–289
167.
Wash. Rev. Code 71.09.020 (2005).
168.
WebsterC.D.DouglasK.S.EavesD.HartS.D. (1997). HCR-20 Assessing Risk For Violence (Version 2). Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute
169.
WinickB.LaFondJ.Q. (2003). Protecting Society from Sexually Dangerous Offender: Law, Justice, and Therapy. Washington DC: American Psychological Association
170.
WollertR. (2002). The Importance of Cross-Validation in Actuarial Test Construction: Shrinkage in the Risk Estimates for the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool Revised. Journal of Threat Assessment, 2(1), 87–102
171.
WollertR. (2006). Low Base Rates Limit Expert Certainty When Current Actuarials Are Used to Identify Sexually Violent Predators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(1), 56–85
172.
WoodworthG.G.KadaneJ.B. (2004). Expert testimony supporting post-sentence civil incarceration of violent sexual offenders. Law, Probability and Risk, 3, 221–241
