“Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS)” is described by a number of symptoms (not always agreed upon by experts) and can lead to lifelong problems or death. There are many possible motives for shaking a baby, usually six months old or younger, some of which might be averted by better parent education. The legal ramifications of shaking a baby resulting in severe physical stress or death vary to some extent by perpetrator and/or by state.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse & Neglect (2001). Shaken baby syndrome: Rotational cranial injuries—Technical report. Pediatrics, 108(1), 206–210
2.
Anon. (2005, September 15). Baby deaths challenge prosecution. Raleigh, NC. News & Observer, www.newsobserver.com. Downloaded September 16, 2005
3.
BuckhamT. (2005, September 3). Program to teach skills in parenting. Buffalo News. www.Buffalo.com. Downloaded October 20, 2005
4.
CaffeyJ. (1972). On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 124, 161–169
5.
CaffeyJ. (1974). The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: Manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics, 54, 396–403
6.
CarbaughS. F. (2004). Understanding shaken baby syndrome. Advances in Neonatal Care, 4(2), 105–116
7.
CastanedaR. (2005, October 25). Parents get $1 million in false abuse case. Washington Post, p. B2
8.
ColbyC.SandersT.WheelerP. (2003, February). Prosecuting cases of suspected “Shaken Baby Syndrome”: A review of current issues. Criminal Law Review, 93–106
9.
Commonwealth v. Velasquez S.E.2d, 2004 WL1773647 Va. App. (2004).
10.
Commonwealth v. Woodward, 427 Mass 659, 694 N.E. 2d 1227 (1998).
11.
D'AmicoS. (2001). Inherently female cases of child abuse and neglect: A gender-neutral analysis. Fordham Urban Law Review, 28, 866–880
12.
DaviesW. R.GarwoodM. M. (2001). Who are the perpetrators and why do they do it?Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5(1), 41–54
13.
DonohoeM. (2003). Evidence-based medicine and shaken baby syndrome: Part I Literature review, 1996–1998. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 25(2), 239–242
14.
DuhaimeA-C.ChristianC. W.RorkeL. B.ZimmermanR. A. (1998). Nonaccidental head injury in infants—the “Shaken Baby Syndrome.”New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 1822–1829
15.
EvansT. (2005, September 1). Child abuse prompts call for action: Summit planned as man is charged in boy's death. Indy Star; Indystar.com. Downloaded October 20, 2005
16.
GeddesJ. F.PlunkettJ. (2004). The evidence for shaken baby syndrome. British Medical Journal, 328, 719–720
17.
GoodmarkL. (2003). When a parent is a batterer: Understanding and working with abusive fathers. Child Law Practice, 22(8), 121–122, 126–129
18.
HardingB.RisdonR. B.KrausH. F. (2004). Shaken Baby Syndrome. British Medical Journal, 328, 720–721
19.
HatinaJ. D. (1998). Shaken Baby Syndrome: Who are the true experts?Cleveland State Law Review, 46, 557–583
20.
HolmgrenB. K. (2001). Prosecuting the shaken infant case. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5(1), 275–339
21.
KempA. M. (2002). Investigating subdural hemorrhage in infants. Archives of Diseases of Childhood, 86, 98–102
22.
KempeC. H.SilvermanF. N. (1962). The battered child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 17–24
23.
LazoritzS.PalusciV. J. (Eds.) (2001). The Shaken Baby Syndrome: A multidisciplinary approach. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press
24.
LockeM. (2005, September 18). A moment of violence, a child's life destroyed. Raleigh, NC: News & Observer. Downloaded September 18, 2005
25.
LyonsG. (2003). Shaken Baby Syndrome: A questionable scientific syndrome and a dangerous legal concept. Utah Law Review, 1109–1132
26.
McMillanJ. P. (1995). Prosecuting child abuse: Homicide in Iowa. Drake Law Review, 44, 129–160
27.
MinnsR. A. (2005). Shaken Baby Syndrome: Theoretical and evidential controversies. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 35, 5–15
28.
National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome (1998). Please don't shake me. Downloaded October 31, 2005
29.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (n.d.). NINDS Shaken Baby Syndrome Information page. Downloaded June 29, 2005
30.
Pennsylvania State University (2005, May 7). Study shows education program reduces Shaken Baby Syndrome incidents. Law & Health Weekly, p. 323
31.
PhippsC. (1999). Responding to child homicide: A statutory proposal. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89, 535–593
32.
PlunkettJ. (2001). Pediatric head injuries caused by short distance falls. American Journal Of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 22(1), 1–12
33.
Public Opinion (2005, September 3). Shaking babies will injure them. www.publicopiniononline.com. Downloaded September 15, 2005
34.
ReeceR. M. (2001). Controversies in Shaken Baby/Shaken Impact Syndrome. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5(1), 367–388
35.
RheinR. (2003). Assessing criminal history for the passive parent: Why New York should hold the passive parent criminally liable. Cardozo Women's Law Journal, 9, 627–657
36.
ScheibnerV. (2001). Shaken baby diagnoses on shaky ground. Journal of Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, 20(2), 5–8
37.
ShowersJ. (1992). “Don't Shake the Baby”: The effectiveness of a prevention program. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 11–18
38.
SmartC. (2005, October 2). No proof on either side of the Shaken Baby debate. Salt Lake (Utah) Tribune. Downloaded October 20, 2005
39.
StarlingS.HoldenJ. R.JennyC. (1995). Abusive head trauma: The relationship of Perpetrators to their victims. Pediatrics, 95(2), 259–262
40.
State v. Blue, 138 N.C. App 404, 531 S.E. 2d 267, N. C. App (June 20, 2000).
41.
State v. Butts N.E. 2004 WL 449245—2005—Ohio 1136, Ohio App 10 Dist. (March 11, 2004).
42.
State v. Glenn, La 2005 So 2d, LA App 5 cir (2005).
43.
State v. Vizcarra, 2000 WL 655269 (Calif.)
44.
State v. Eugene Wong and State v. Mary Wong, 81 N.Y.2d 600, 619 N.E.2d 377, 601 N.Y.S. 2d 440. (July 8, 1993).
45.
StoodleyN. (2002, July 27). Non-accidental head injury in children: Gathering the evidence. The Lancet, 360, 271–272
46.
UscinskiR, (2002). Shaken Baby Syndrome: Fundamental questions. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 16(3), 217–219
