Consultation in disability insurance matters is an emerging area of forensic practice, but little has been written to inform work in this area. This article will first distinguish between evaluative and consultative roles, and then suggest a framework for practice in this area based on the principles of forensic mental health assessment developed by Heilbrun (2001). Adherence to such a framework can assist the consult in ensuring practice conforms to ethical and professional standards emphasizing objectivity, accuracy, and impartiality, while at the same time acknowledging the unique demands of the consultative role.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved February 26, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html.
2.
Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord, (2003), 538 U.S. 822.
3.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists (1991). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. Law & Human Behavior, 15, 655–665.
4.
GoldsteinA. (2003). Overview of forensic psychology. In GoldsteinA. (Ed), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Wiley.
5.
GreenbergS.ShumanD. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 28(1), 50–57.
6.
GreenbergS.ShumanD.MeyerR. (2004). Unmasking forensic diagnosis. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 27(1), 1–15.
7.
HadjistavropoulosT.BielingP. (2001). File review consultation in the adjudication of mental health and chronic pain disability claims. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 53(1), 52–63.
8.
HeilbrunK. (2001). Principles of Forensic Mental Health Assessment. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
9.
HeilbrunK.MarczykG.DeMatteoD. (2002). Forensic mental health assessment: A casebook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
HeilbrunK.WarrenJ.PicarelloK. (2003). Third party information in forensic assessment. In GoldsteinA. (Ed), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology, (pp. 69–86). New York: Wiley.
Social Security Administration. (2006, February 14). Actuarial Publications: Selected Data from Social Security's Disability Program. Retrieved February 24, 2006 from http://www.ssa.gov/OACTISTATS/dibStat.html.
13.
Trigon Insurance Co. v. United States. (2002). 215 F. Supp. 2nd 687 (ED Va.)
