Abstract
This study examines the perspective of judges regarding child custody evaluations by mental health professionals. Ninety-seven judges completed an anonymous survey regarding: a) legal standards and personal biases influencing judicial custody decision-making; b) issues that prompt judges to order custody evaluations; c) expected evaluation procedures and report components; d) parts of the report judges find useful for decision-making; and e) the effect of the evaluation on litigation and judicial decision-making. Findings indicate that judges are most likely to order custody evaluations for allegations regarding sexual or physical abuse or parental unfitness. Judges reported that they expect a comprehensive procedure and find utility in an inclusive report. Survey findings suggest that custody evaluations play a significant role in judicial decision-making; however, judges are hesitant to have mental health professionals testify as to the ultimate custody question.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.