Abstract
This is a rejoinder to the preceding commentaries on the authors' paper “Surrogate Endpoints in AIDS Drug Development: Current Status.” The authors thank Drs. Ellenberg and Gould for their thought-provoking commentaries and reiterate that information accumulation in the AIDS area, including that from meta-analyses on the concordance between CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA response with the clinical response, is dynamic and fast paced. In addition, the authors remind the readers of the calculated risk associated with decision making in the drug development process. Some information that has become available since the writing of the original manuscript is also included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
